Abstract：Based on the cross-modal deep learning model, ChatGPT acquires the ability to participate in ideological and political education (IPD), thus enabling communication between the subjects and objects of IPD and artificial intelligence in reality. Specifically, after precisely identifying the corresponding mechanism of questions and answers in IPD by feature association techniques, ChatGPT achieves technical intervention in IPD through aggregating corpus knowledge, transforming data meaning, producing text content, correcting and outputting answers in interactive communication with subjects and objects of IPD under a mechanism of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback. However, the IPD discourse produced by ChatGPT’s intervention has led to the imbalance between subjects and objects, deconstruction of the speculative value of inter-subjectivity, and resolution of the emotional function of the subjects. The technical defects of ChatGPT are mainly due to the inability to accurately distinguish the authenticity of the information source and to fully understand the language connotation. The influence of the two major defects on the input and output content may strengthen the object’s wrong cognition of the mainstream ideology, and destroy the formed cognitive structure in line with the mainstream ideology. As the improper use of ChatGPT will lead to security risks such as ideological infiltration and dissemination of wrong thoughts, it is expected that we should analyze the underlying algorithm technology of ChatGPT actively, study the rules and characteristics of ChatGPT’s production of ideological and political discourse, and construct a positive ideological and political communication and acceptance mechanism to make the IPD subjects and objects’ thinking change from passive adaptation to technological intervention to active identification of intellectual control technology. Thus, the educational mission of upholding integrity and innovation, advancing morality, and cultivating people can be accomplished.
王少. ChatGPT介入思想政治教育的技术线路、安全风险及防范[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2023, 40(2): 153-160.
WANG Shao. The Technical Route, Security Risk and Prevention of ChatGPT’s Intervention in Ideological and Political Education. , 2023, 40(2): 153-160.
[1] 习近平在全国高校思想政治工作会议上强调把思想政治工作贯穿教育教学全过程开创我国高等教育事业发展新局面[N].人民日报,2016-12-09(01). [2] 李厚锐. 智媒时代思想政治教育话语建设路径创新研究[J].中国高等教育,2022,(20):33-35. [3] (英)维克托·迈尔-舍恩伯格,肯尼思·库克耶.大数据时代[M].盛杨燕,周涛译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2013.71. [4] Shen Y, Heacock L, Elias J, et al. ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models Are Double-edged Swords[EB/OL].https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/epdf/10.1148/radiol.230163,2023-03-13. [5] 张耀灿等. 现代思想政治教育学[M].北京:人民出版社,2006.191. [6] 张春泉. 论接受心理与修辞表达[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2007.94. [7] 朱永新,袁振国,马国川.人工智能与未来教育[M].太原:山西教育出版社,2018.10. [8] 杨波,戴艳军.新时代思想政治教育话语的理论与表达双重锻造探析[J].思想教育研究,2021,(3):19-23. [9] 习近平在中国人民大学考察时强调坚持党的领导传承红色基因扎根中国大地走出一条建设中国特色世界一流大学新路[N].人民日报,2022-04-26(01). [10] 龙柏林. 青年群体意识形态安全的重要性及实现路径[J].人民论坛,2022,(16):26-29. [11] Wiebe E.Bijker, Thomas Parke Hughes and Trevor Pinch.The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Techno-logy[M].Cambridge,Massachusetts: MIT Press,2012.405. [12] H Holden Thorp.ChatGPT Is Fun, but Not An Author[J]. Science,2023,379(6630):313. [13] 习近平. 思政课是落实立德树人根本任务的关键课程[J].求是,2020,(17):4-16. [14] (美)迈克斯·泰格马克.生命3.0——人工智能时代人类的进化与重生[M].汪婕舒译.杭州:浙江教育出版社,2018.444. [15] Resnik D B.The Ethics of Science: An Introduction[M].London; New York: Routledge,1998.53-68.
2023, Vol. 40 
粤公网安备44030502007936号