Abstract：Corruption is a long-standing regular anti-moral behavior or phenomenon. It is the abuse of public resources, public interests, public organizations and public positions against law and principle of public order and good custom to satisfy the interest of some individuals and groups. It has been an important issue that has long been concerned in theory and practice by scholars all around the world. Combing through the studies of foreign corruption, we find that concept definition, cause measurement and control mechanism as three important dimensions of foreign corruption studies, respectively constitute the logical starting point, focus and emphasis of inquiry. Firstly, concept definition as the logical starting point of foreign corruption research is the theoretical basis of the research. Regarding what is corruption, foreign academia has formed the classic school that emphasizes the individual moral anomie and the modern school that emphasizes the violation of public interests, and on this basis develops the neo-classical school that highlights the construction of a moral discourse system and the new modern school that is dedicated to the study of the dynamic and regular attributes of corruption. Secondly, cause measurement,the focus of foreign corruption research, has enabled researchers to have a basic understanding of the besetting sin of foreign corruption. In regard to the causes of corruption, foreign scholars have analyzed corruption at different levels of individuals, groups and the whole society. They believe that individual corruption is, to some extent, an alternative scheme when personal needs cannot be satisfied. Group corruption is related to the inducing mechanism of ideology on the group behavior, that is, the highly elitist ideology somehow reduces the corruption awareness, stimulate corruption intentions, and ultimately affects the effectiveness of the social execution mechanism, thus inducing corruption. The overall corruption stems from the corruption subculture caused by prevalent materialistic values and the resulting hotbed of corruption. Finally, the solution mechanism, namely, ways to curb, control and reduce corruption as much as possible is the focus for foreign scholars. In pursuit of a solution mechanism, foreign academics believe that corruption should be addressed in accordance with its cause, characteristics, and type. To address individual corruption, the key is to provide basic public services satisfactory for individuals through institutional and structural reform and thus reduce the incentive for individual corruption. To address group corruption, the key is to crack down on the secondary distribution of interests at the political level resulting from the polarization of wealth caused by unbalanced economic development and make the social execution mechanism more effective. To address overall corruption, the key is to establish and improve specific institutions at macor-level, more strict supervision, monitoring and procuratorial mechanism, and more severe punitive measures so as to effectively curb corruption.
董娟. 界定、测量与控制：国外腐败研究的主要维度和问题[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2020, 37(4): 103-111.
DONG Juan. Definition, Measurement and Control: Major Dimensions and Problems in the Researches on Foreign Corruption. , 2020, 37(4): 103-111.
[1] Mark Philp.Access, Accountability and Authority:Corruption and the Democratic Process[J].Crime, Law & Social Change,2001,36(4):357-377. [2] (古希腊)柏拉图. 理想国[M].郭斌和,张竹明译.北京:商务印书馆,1986.19. [3] (古希腊)亚里士多德.政治学[M].吴寿彭译.北京:商务印书馆,2007.88. [4] Robert Williams.New Concepts for Old?[J].The Third World Quarterly,1999,20(3):503-513. [5] 李莉. 海外中国腐败研究文献述评[J].当代中国政治研究报告,2013,(1):267-285. [6] Mohammed, Usman.Corruption in Nigeria: A Challenge to Sustainable Development in the Fourth Republic[J]. European Scientific Journal,2013,9(4):118. [7] Buchan.Bruce,Lisa Hill.An Intellectual History of Political Corruption[EB/OL].https://ucalgary-primo.hosted.exlibr-isgroup.com/permalink/f/1vibdgm/TN_a nds71650.2019 -09-10. [8] Vaidya,Ranjan.Corruption,Re-corruption and What Transpires in Between: The Case of a Government Officer in India[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2019,156(3):605-620. [9] Banerjee,Abhijit,Sendhil Mullainathan,Rema Hanna. Corruption[EB/OL].https://ucalgary-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1vibdgm/TN_proqu-est1687844564.2019-09-11. [10] Werlin, Herbert H.Revisiting Corruption: With a New Definition[J].International Review of Administrative Sc-iences,1994, 60(4):547-558. [11] Bowal,Peter,Christopher.What is Wrong with Corruption?[EB/OL].https://ucalgary-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1jj5gu9/01UCALG_D-SPACE1880/49676.2019-09-11. [12] Jiang,Guoping,T. Wing Lo, and Carrie Li.Youths’ Views on Corruption Control in China: Politics and Social Censure[J].International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 2013,57(12):1498-1521. [13] Forde,Brendan.Double Paradox: Rapid Growth and Rising Corruption in China[J].The China Journal,2013,(70):204-205. [14] Pasternak,Jacyr.Corruption[J].Einstein (Sao Paulo),2017, 15(3):11-12. [15] Quah, Jon S.T. Different Paths to Curbing Corruption : Lessons from Denmark,Finland,Hong Kong,New Zealand and Singapore[M].Bingley:Emerald Publishing Limited,2013. [16] Crosston M.D.Corruption, Anti-corruption and Governance[M].Chicago: American Library Association.2013. 114. [17] McMann, Kelly M. Corruption As a Last Resort: Adapting to the Market in Central Asia[M]. New York:Cornell University Press,2014. [18] Tan, Xuyun, Li Liu, Zhenwei Huang, Wenwen Zheng. Working for the Hierarchical System: The Role of Meritocratic Ideology in the Endorsement of Corruption[J]. Political Psychology,2017,38(3):469-479. [19] Moene, Karl,Tina S reide.Corruption Control[J].Crime, Law and Social Change,2016,66(2):147-163. [20] Forde, Brendan.Double Paradox: Rapid Growth and Rising Corruption in China[J]. The China Journal, 2013, (70):204-205. [21] Kubik,Jan,Linch,Amy.Postcommunism from Within : Social Justice,Mobilization,and Hegemony[M].New York: New York University Press,2013.293. [22] Wedeman,Andrew Hall.Double Paradox:Rapid Growth and Rising Corruption in China[M].New York:Cornell University Press,2012.15. [23] Salmon, Timothy C, Danila Serra. Corruption, Social Judgment and Culture: An Experiment[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,2017,142(C):64-78. [24] Pav o,Nara.Corruption as the Only Option:The Limits to Electoral Accountability[J].The Journal of Politics,2018, 80(3):996-1010.
2020, Vol. 37 
粤公网安备44030502007936号