网络媒体新生代农民工身份的辞屏构建

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (7)

全文: PDF (755 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 “辞屏”是伴随修辞动机对现实进行遮蔽、凸显以导引受众的特定修辞性术语。基于对网络媒体新生代农民工新闻报道的检索,以辞屏效应的产生及作用机制为主要依据,采用语料库话语分析方法及辞屏效应分析框架,聚焦主题词、角色表征、隐喻、互文性4种语言策略和情感倾向性分析,对网络媒体新生代农民工身份的辞屏构建过程进行研究,结果发现：网络媒体所用语词形成相互勾连的连续辞屏,构建了新生代农民工奋斗者、行动者、受益者等积极身份以及边缘人、弱势群体等消极身份;文本整体情感倾向分析显示网络媒体对于新生代农民工群体持正面态度;辞屏将新生代农民工的积极身份进行前景化凸显,通过话语传播实践过程中形成的辞屏效应导引并影响受众的态度及行为,从而实现网络媒体与受众的同一,助益新生代农民工群体的社会认同。因此,善用“辞屏”修辞,有助于为网络媒体构筑和提升新生代农民工的媒体话语权提供一定的学理基础。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	作者相关文章
	王文娟
	鞠玉梅

关键词 ：网络媒体, 新生代农民工, 辞屏, 身份, 修辞功能, 同一

Abstract：“Terministic screen” is a specific rhetorical term that accompanies the rhetorical motivation to cover and highlight the reality to guide the audience. Based on the generation and function mechanism of the terministic screen effect, corpus discourse analysis and terministic screen effect analysis framework,this study retrieves the news reports of new-generation migrant workers in the network media, using linguistic strategies of key words, role representation, metaphor, intertextuality and sentiment orientation analysis to study the identity construction process of new-generation migrant workers. The findings are as follows. The words in the news reports form a closely related terministic screen, which constructs the new-generation migrant workers with positive identities such as striver, actor and beneficiary, and negative identities such as marginal people and vulnerable groups. The overall sentiment orientation analysis of the terministic screen indicates that the network media has a positive attitude towards new-generation migrant workers. Terministic screen “foregrounds” the positive identity of new-generation migrant workers, guide and influence the audience’s attitude and behavior through the terministic screen effect formed in discursive communication so as to realize the identification of the network media and audience, and promote the social identity of new-generation migrant workers. Therefore, making good use of “terministic screen” helps to provide a certain theoretical basis for network media to build and enhance the medium discourse power of new-generation migrant workers.

Key words： network media new-generation migrant workers terministic screen identity rhetoric identification

收稿日期: 2021-03-25

中图分类号:

C912.68

基金资助:国家社科基金一般项目“对比修辞学视域下的二语写作及其能力标准研究”（15BYY074）; 曲阜师范大学交叉学科研究项目“政治话语的修辞叙事及其身份构建研究”（XSKJC201906）

作者简介: 王文娟,曲阜师范大学国际教育学院讲师,2016级语言学及应用语言学专业博士生,主要从事话语分析和修辞学研究;鞠玉梅,曲阜师范大学外国语学院教授,博士生导师,主要从事修辞学和话语分析研究。

引用本文:

王文娟, 鞠玉梅. 网络媒体新生代农民工身份的辞屏构建[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2021, 38(4): 37-46. WANG Wen-juan, JU Yu-mei. Identity Construction of New-Generation Migrant Workers through Terministic Screen in Network Media. , 2021, 38(4): 37-46.

链接本文:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 https://xb.szu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V38/I4/37

[1] De Fina,A.Schiffrin,D.& Bamberg,M.Discourse and Identity[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2006.2-3.
[2] 孙文中. 承继式累积:新生代农民工的购房型社会融入研究[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,(3):121-130.
[3] Li,H.Effects of Human Capital Investment on Entrepren-eurial Capability of New Generation of Migrant Workers-an Empirical Study Based on Questionnaire Survey in Chongqing[J].Asian Agricultural Research,2018,(12):13-18.
[4] 卢冲,伍薆霖.收入差距、社会支持与新生代农民工心理健康[J].人口与发展,2019,(4):65-77.
[5] 张斌华. 珠三角新生代农民工语言使用、态度及认同研究[J].语言文字应用,2016,(3):30-39.
[6] Grad H.& Rojo,L.M.Identities in Discourse[A].Dolón, R. & Todolí, J.Analyzing Identities in Discourse[C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,2008.3-28.
[7] 何荷,陈新仁.网店店主关系身份建构的语用研究[J].现代外语,2015,(3):347-356.
[8] Freud,S.The Ego and the Id[M].New York:W.W.Norton & Company Inc,1989.8.
[9] Tajfel,H.& Turner, J.The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior[A].Jost,J.T.& Sidanius,J.Political Psychology: Key Readings[C].New York: Psychology Press, 2004. 276-293.
[10] Hall S.Introduction:Who Need Identity?[A].Hall,S. & du Gay,P.Questions of Cultural Identity[C].London:Sage,1996. 1-17.
[11] Benwell B.& Stokoe, E. Discourse and Identity[M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.
[12] Kroskrity P.Identity[J].Journal of Linguistic Anthropology,2000,(9):111-114.
[13] 袁周敏,陈新仁.语言顺应论视角下的语用身份建构研究——以医疗咨询会话为例[J].外语教学与研究,2013,(4):518-530.
[14] Ge Y. F.& Wang, H. The Representation of Ordinary People: A Discursive Study of Identities Constructed in China’s News Reports of Social Conflicts[J].Discourse, Context & Media,2018,(26):52-63.
[15] 姚喜明,王惠敏.论肯尼斯·伯克语言观中的术语视界[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2009,(6):122-130.
[16] Burke,K.Language as Symbolic Action:Essays on Life, Literature and Method[M].Berkeley:The University of California Press,1966.
[17] 鞠玉梅.辞屏建构的中非往来:《经济学人》中非关系报道话语分析[J].当代修辞学,2020,(1).
[18] Burke K.On Symbols and Society[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, 1989.
[19] Burke K.Counter-statement[M].Berkeley:The University of California Press,1968.143.
[20] Fowler R.Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press[M].London:Routledge,1991.66.
[21] Van Dijk, T. A. Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis[J].Discourse & Society,1993,(2):49-83.
[22] Fairclough N. L.Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language[M].London:Longman,1995.7.
[23] Fowler,R.On Critical Linguistics[A].Caldas-Coulthard, C.R.&Coulthard,M.Texts and Practices:Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis[C].New York:Routledge,1996.3-14.
[24] Bell A.The Language of News Media[M].Oxford:Basil Blackwell Inc,1991.149-152.
[25] 钱毓芳. 语料库与批判话语分析[J].外语教学与研究,2010,(3):198-202.
[26] Baker P.Querying Keywords[J].Journal of English Linguistics,2004,(4):346-359.
[27] 陈治安,彭宣维.人称指示语研究[J].外国语,1994,(3):28-34.
[28] Qingye Tanga & Qing Lia. Voicing the Self: Discursive Representations of Chinese Old-generation Migrant Workers[J].Third World Quarterly,2015,(11):2167-2182.
[29] Van Leeuwen,T.The Representation of Social Actors[A].Caldas-Coulthard,C.R.&Coulthard,M.Texts and Practices:Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis[C].London: Routledge,1996.32-70.
[30] Burke,K.A Grammar of Motives[M].US:University of California Press,1969.
[31] Tuchman,G.Making News[M].New York: The Free Press, 1978.190.
[32] Aristotle.Rhetoric and Poetry[M].New York: The Modern Library,1952.343.
[33] Wagner I.& Wodak, R. Performing Success: Identifying Strategies of Self-presentation in Women’s Biographical Narratives[J].Discourse & Society,2006,(3):385-411.
[34] Wolf H. G.& Polzenhagen, F. Conceptual Metaphor as Ideological Stylistic Means: An Exemplary Analysis[A]. Dirven,R., Frank, R. & Putz,M.Cognitive Models in Language and Thought: Ideology,Metaphors and Meanings[C].Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter,2003.247-276.
[35] 鞠玉梅. 伯克的隐喻观研究[J].当代修辞学,2010,(4):45-52.
[36] Steen, G.J, Dorst, A.G, Herrmann, J.B, Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T.& Pasma, T. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification[M].Amsterdam: John Benjamins,2010.5.
[37] 徐延辉. 社会经济保障与农民工的身份认同[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2019,(2):102-111.
[38] Frank,A.The Great American Scaffold:Intertextuality and Identity in American Presidential Discourse[M].Amsterdam:Johns Benjamins,2014.29.
[39] Geis,M.L.The Language of Politics[M].New York:Springer Verlag, 1987.10.
[40] 郭晓科,李欢.“走转改”:新闻人民性的回归和升华[J].新闻研究导刊,2012,(9).
[41] Burke,K.A Rhetoric of Motives[M].US:University of California Press,1969.46.
[42] Perelman,C.The Realm of Rhetoric[M].Notre Dame:University of Norte Dame Press,1982.35.