Abstract：Public crisis and the credibility of the grassroots party organizations are interrelated: the credibility of the grassroots party organizations determines whether the crisis is resolved or intensified. Public crisis is a special field affecting the credibility of the grassroots party organizations. It provides opportunities for the party organization to provide specific support, but the specific support decreases when the crisis gets less serious, and the credibility of the party organization changes accordingly. However, the specific support disappearing as the crisis comes to an end will be cherished by the public, and become the basis for more supports, which lays a foundation for maintaining and improving the credibility of the party organization. Therefore, the grassroots party organizations should take the current crisis of Covid-19 as a special opportunity to improve their credibility and help resolve the crisis. Considering the special situation of the public crisis and the multidimensional nature of credibility, it is necessary to improve the credibility of grassroots party organizations and resolve the public crisis from four aspects: in terms of credibility competence, we need to enhance the ability of the grassroots party organizations to deal with crisis; in terms of credibility openness, we should make the information of the party organization fully open; in terms of the object characteristics of credibility, the party organization should prioritize sense of responsibility and commitment; in terms of subjective psychology of credibility, the grassroots party organizations should raise their awareness of community.
李桂秋. 重大突发公共危机事件中基层党组织公信力功能与提升[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2020, 37(2): 124-131.
LI Gui-qiu. Functions and Improvement Measures of the Credibility of Grassroots Party Organizations in Major Public Emergency Crises. , 2020, 37(2): 124-131.
[1] (美)罗德里克·M·克雷默,汤姆·R·泰勒.组织中的信任[M].官兵等译.北京:中国城市出版社,2003. [2] Silver,A.“Trust” in social and political theory[A].G.D. Suttles, M.N.Zald.The challenge of Social Control[C]. Norwood,Mass: Ablex Publishers,1985.56. [3] Seligman,A.The Problem of Trust[M].Princeton,New Jersey: Princeton University Press,1997.14. [4] Barber,B.The Logic and Limits of Trust[M].New Brunswick,New Jesey: Rutgers University Press,1983.21 [5] (波兰)彼得·什姆普卡.信任:一种社会学理论[M].程胜利译.北京:中华书局,2005. [6] (美)塞缪尔·P·亨廷顿.变化社会中的政治秩序[M].王冠华,刘为等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2008.41. [7] (古罗马)普布里乌斯·克奈力乌斯·塔西佗.历史[M].王以铸等译.北京:商务印书馆,1987.7. [8] (美)戴维·伊斯顿.政治生活的系统分析[M].王浦劬译.北京:人民出版社,2012. [9] 徐彪. 负面事件后政府信任危机的形成机制研究:一个准实验研究[J].学海,2019,(2):114. [10] (美)马克·E.沃伦.民主与信任[M].吴辉译.北京:华夏出版社,2004.24. [11] Easton,David.A Reassessment of the Concept of Political Support[J].British Journal of Political Science 5,1975.437. [12] (美)马克·格兰诺维特.社会与经济:信任、权力与制度[M].王水雄,罗家德译.北京:中信出版社.2019. [13] (美)詹姆斯·科尔曼.社会理论的基础(上)[M].邓方译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,1992.108. [14] Tyler,Tom.Why Do People Rely on Others? Social Identity and the Social Aspects of Trust[A].K.Cook. Trust in Society[C].New York: Russell Sage Foundation,2001.
2020, Vol. 37 
粤公网安备44030502007936号