Abstract：Since the other was beyond rhetoric and language, how could Levinas put forward the ethical concept of the absolute other without incorporating the other into the existential discourse? Therefore, in the opinion of many skeptics, this was “the paradox” that Levinas could not resolve. At this point, Lyotard believed that this was just a neo-Hegelian misreading. Lyotard established a unique logic of prescriptive statements, which were not commensurable with denotative (or descriptive) one, but “other than” or “beyond” it. It would go to the paradox of formal logic or misreading if the discourse of Levinas put into the logic of denotative statements. Instead, it is only being placed in a logic that “other than” denotative statements that it could be correctly understood. Accordingly, Lyotard believed that Levinas just tried to suggest an asymmetric relationship with “the other” through this unique way of statements, and then established the absolute obligation to others.
石德金. “他者的悖谬”：利奥塔对列维纳斯责任伦理的解读[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2016, 33(4): 52-56.
SHI De-jin. “The Paradox of the Other”: Lyotard’s Interpretation of Levinas’Ethics of Obligation. , 2016, 33(4): 52-56.
[1] Emmanuel Levinas,Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority[M].Trans. Alphonso Lingis.Hage:Martinus Nijhoff Pu-blishers, 1979. [2] Darren Ambrose.“Lyotard and Levinas: The Logic of Obligation”[J].JAC, Vol. 29, No. 3, Special Issue: Levinas and Rhetoric (2009). [3] Emmanuel Levinas.Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence[M].Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2006. [4] Emmanuel Levinas.Of God Who Comes to Mind[M].Trans. Bettina Bergo. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.82. [5] （法）雅克·德里达.书写与差异[M].张宁译.北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店,2001. [6] Claire Katz with Lara Trout, Ed. Emmanuel Levinas: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, VolⅠ,Levinas, Phenomenology and his Critics[C].London and New York: Routledge, 2005. [7] Robert Bernasconi, David Wood, ed.The Provocation of Levinas? Rethinking the Other[M].New York: Routledge, 1988. [8] Jean-Francois Lyotard.“Levinas' Logic”[A].Trans.Andrew Benjamin.The Lyotard Reader[C].Ed. Andrew Benjamin. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989. [9] （法）利奥塔.话语,图形[M].谢晶译.上海：上海人民出版社,2012.3. [10] Jean-Francois Lyotard.The Differend: Phrases in Dispute[M].Trans. Georges Van Den Abbeele, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988. [11] James Williams.Lyotard: Towards a Postmodern Philosophy[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.123.
2016, Vol. 33 
粤公网安备44030502007936号