|
|
|
| The Practical Logic and System Design of Culturology Discipline Development |
| ZHANG Wei1,2, SHAO Ming-hua3 |
1. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, Hainan, 571158;
2. School of Humanities, Luxun Academy of Fine Arts, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004;
3. School of History/Institute of Cultural Industries Research, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250100 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The development of Chinese culture in the new era has a distinct practical logic, and it urgently calls for the establishment of an independent discipline of culturology within our country’s academic system. Establishing an independent discipline of culturology is a key measure and an inevitable requirement for implementing the logic of XI Jin-ping Thought on Culture, the strategy of a country with a strong socialist culture, the development of the cultural industries, the public welfare aspects of cultural undertakings, and for strengthening the academic foundations of the Cultural Industries Management. From the formation of core concepts in culture and culturology to the accumulation of theoretical research within the domestic academic community; from the experience of renowned overseas universities in developing related disciplines to the practical experience of domestic universities in running relevant programmes; and considering the fundamental elements that culturology has already established as an independent discipline, the establishment of a discipline of culturology in China now possesses sufficient practical feasibility and an academic foundation. Focusing on the discipline’s fundamental connotations, core characteristics and scope, the development of culturology could be approached through the following three options: establishing culturology as a first-level discipline within the Interdisciplinary category; establishing it as a first-level discipline within the Law category; or even establishing it as an independent disciplinary category of culturology. We should follow the practical logic of the construction of culturology, optimize the design of the disciplinary system, and build a culturology disciplinary system, academic system and discourse system with Chinese characteristics, Chinese style and Chinese demeanor, contributing Chinese wisdom to the development of Chinese culture and the progress of human civilization.
|
|
Received: 28 November 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 习近平. 加快建设文化强国[J].求是,2025,(8):4-8.
[2] 习近平.在文艺工作座谈会上的讲话[N].人民日报,2015-10-15(002).
[3] 中共十八届五中全会在京举行[N].人民日报,2015-10-30(001).
[4] 张伟.用创新精神推动治国理政文化新实践[N].中国艺术报,2016-03-25(003).
[5] 2024年全国文化及相关产业增加值占GDP比重为4.61%[ED/OL].https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202512/t2025 1230_1962179.html,2026-03-25.
[6] 2025年全国规模以上文化及相关产业企业营业收入增长7.4%[ED/OL].https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfbhjd/2026 01/t20260130_1962411.html,2026-03-25.
[7] 福建省人力资源和社会保障厅关于印发《福建省2026-2027年度紧缺急需人才引进指导目录》的通知[ED/OL].http://rst.fujian.gov.cn/zw/zfxxgk/zfxxgkml/zyywgz/zynljs/20 2601/t20260122_7083980.htm,2026-03-30.
[8] 毕业即“入编”,为何这行还这么缺人?[ED/OL].https://b-aijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1806433282189583062&wfr=sp-ider&for=pc,2026-03-31.
[9] 周建新,朱学平.中国文化产业研究2024年度学术报告[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2025,(1):46-58.
[10] 王金会. 文化政策驱动下的中国文化产业关键性问题[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,(1):44-54.
[11] 肖波,王诗怡.学科视域下的文化产业:历史脉络与发展进路[J].文化软实力研究,2021,(4):10-21.
[12] 张伟. 生命·文化·艺术:艺术文化学导论[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1999.90.
[13] 吴璟薇,景嘉伊.文化学研究的范式建构:跨学科语境的多维视角——对安斯加·纽宁教授的访谈[J].国际新闻界,2024,(1):164-176.
[14] 钱学森. 研究社会主义精神财富创造事业的学问——文化学[J].中国社会科学,1982,(6):89-96.
[15] 李培林.“文化学”应成为一种学科[N].北京日报,2024-01-22(019).
[16] 马健. 文化产业管理专业的学科归属与专业设置[J].艺术管理(中英文),2021,(2):5-12.
[17] 章建刚. 作为一门社会科学学科的文化学:学科史建构述略[J].学术探索,2020,(4):146-151.
[18] (美)C·恩伯,M·恩伯.文化的变异——现代文化人类学通论[M].杜杉杉译.沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1988.4.
[19] 郭齐勇,邓晓芒.文化学内核刍议[J].哲学研究,1988,(5):3-8.
[20] 胡惠林. 关于作为科学的“文化产业学”建构的思考[J].中国文化产业评论,2005,(1):269-282. |
|
|
|
2026, Vol. 43 
