|
|
|
| Towards Great Integration: The Optimization Path of “Culture+” Disciplines |
| LI Feng-liang1, WANG Bo2 |
1. College of Humanities and Law, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510642;
2. Institute for Cultural Industries, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The “Culture+” discipline refers to a highly integrated interdisciplinary field that takes culture as both its fundamental point of departure and ultimate value orientation. Focusing on the entire process of cultural value realization and the complex cultural issues emerging in practice, it comprehensively employs methodologies from the humanities, social sciences, and even technological sciences to investigate the generation, dissemination, transformation, and governance of cultural resources, as well as their interactions with related fields. It embodies a new mode of knowledge production characterized by problem orientation, cultural centrality, and interdisciplinary integration, aiming to respond to practical cultural issues while developing research frameworks, analytical tools, and talent cultivation systems suited to contemporary demands. Although “Culture+” disciplines have reached a certain scale and achieved notable progress, they still face structural problems such as ambiguous disciplinary affiliation, fragmented theoretical systems, and insufficient policy support. As a result, their development has long exhibited characteristics of fragmentation and subordination. The key to overcoming these difficulties lies in moving from dispersed disciplinary arrangements toward institutionalized construction by establishing “Culture and Cultural Industries” as a first-level discipline within the category of interdisciplinary studies. Specifically, this requires constructing an institutional framework to legitimize the discipline of Culture and Cultural Industries, establishing a disciplinary logic centered on the creative transformation and innovative development of cultural resources, and forming an independent system of disciplinary consciousness, research methods, and problem orientation. Its core research areas should include public cultural services, cultural industry development, cultural market operation, cultural technology integration, cultural communication, and cultural governance. Discipline construction should further focus on mechanisms of cultural value generation, realization, dissemination, and governance, while developing key directions such as cultural resource development and preservation, cultural industry operation and management, digital culture and cultural technology integration, and cultural communication and governance. By upholding a humanistic core, innovating management and evaluation systems, and emphasizing the cultivation of interdisciplinary talents, the integrated development of “Culture+” disciplines can be advanced, thereby contributing to the construction of a culturally strong nation.
|
|
Received: 18 December 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 中华人民共和国教育部.新文科建设工作会在山东大学召开[ED/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5 987/202011/t20201103_498067.html,2025-11-03.
[2] 中华人民共和国教育部.教育部等五部门关于印发《普通高等教育学科专业设置调整优化改革方案》的通知[ED/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/202304/t20230404_1054230.html,2026-01-20.
[3] 张树华,张夏添.从工具到共生:生成式人工智能技术驱动下知识生产与“新文科”建构[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025,58(4):21-28+168-169.
[4] 中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十五个五年规划纲要[N].人民日报,2026-03-04(001).
[5] 王钰鑫. 社会主义文化强国:出场、要素、评价与进路[J].江西社会科学,2024,44(11):141-150.
[6] 习近平. 加快建设文化强国[J].求是,2025,(8):4-8.
[7] 国家统计局. 2025年全国规模以上文化及相关产业企业营业收入增长7.4%[EB/0L].https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfbhjd/202601/t20260130_1962411.html,2026-01-30.
[8] 黄永林,傅明.中国式现代化背景下文化产业供需双向升级和高质量发展[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2023,(6):31-43.
[9] 方延明.文科复兴的困境与破局[J].东南学术,2025,(4):116-125+247.
[10] 马志凤,李简益.文科就业难?——来自全国32所高校文科毕业生就业质量的分析[J].宏观质量研究,2024,12(6):116-128.
[11] 张虎,高子桓.人工智能助推新文科建设:内在逻辑、现实困境与实践路径[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025,78(5):33-42.
[12] 苏德超.“文科无用”论、人工智能与新文科的出路[J].新文科教育研究,2025,(1):71-85+142.
[13] 崔育宝,李金龙,张淑林.交叉学科建设:内涵论析、实施困境与推进策略[J].中国高教研究,2022,(4):16-22.
[14] 刘燕,姚冠新,邵荣.交叉学科建设的历史脉络、现实困境和优化策略——基于场域理论的分析视角[J].江苏高教,2025,(4):79-88.
[15] 习近平.在哲学社会科学工作座谈会上的讲话[N].人民日报,2016-05-19(002). |
|
|
|
2026, Vol. 43 
