从元科学视角论文化学学科独立、学科对象与建构路径

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (508 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Culture, as a special field in the social structure that stands alongside economics and politics, plays an important role in the Chinese path to modernization. However, various specific research directions related to culture are currently scattered across numerous different disciplines, and an independent and complete system of culturology has yet to be established. The great practice of Chinese-style modernization, the goal of building a strong cultural country, and the construction of China’s independent knowledge system all urgently require the establishment of a systematic and autonomous culturology. The disciplinary independence and construction of culturology is essentially a metascientific problem, requiring a self-referential and reflective study of culturology from a metascientific perspective to seek its realistic and theoretical basis for current construction as well as future development directions. The “culture” studied in culturology is clearly elucidated by sinicized Marxist cultural theory as “culture as an ideological form” that stands alongside economics and politics. The process of culturology towards disciplinary independence is a gradual one, and it cannot be achieved overnight. It can be achieved step by step according to a “two-step” approach: firstly, culturology can be established as a primary discipline in the field of art or literature. Secondly, culturology can be upgraded to an independent discipline, truly achieving the goal of disciplinary independence for culturology.

Key words： culturology metascience metaculturology disciplinary independence research object

Received: 20 March 2026

:	G124
	G64

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Xin-feng
	ZHANG Li-wei

Cite this article:

LI Xin-feng,ZHANG Li-wei. On the Disciplinary Independence, Research Object, and Construction Pathways of Culturology from a Metascientific Perspective[J]. , 2026, 43(3): 75-84.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2026/V43/I3/75

[1] 李守常. 史学要论[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,2003.4.
[2] 赵立彬. 文化问题与“文化学”建构的本土需求[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2010,(4):98-109.
[3] 刘敏中. 文化学说构架无效要素价值论纲[J].学习与探索,1985,(3):25-32.
[4] (英)贝尔纳,麦凯.走在通向科学学的道路上[A].(英)贝尔纳.科学的社会功能[M].陈体芳译,张今校.北京:商务印书馆,1982.14.
[5] 刘敏中. 文化学学·文化学及文化观念[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,2000.401-411.
[6] 张卫东.“元文化学”:文化研究中的文本、符号与“整体语言”[J].国外文学,2016,(4):1-8+153.
[7] 习近平.在哲学社会科学工作座谈会上的讲话[N].人民日报,2016-05-19(002).
[8] 中共中央宣传部关于认真组织学习《习近平文化思想学习纲要》的通知[A] 中共中央宣传部关于认真组织学习《习近平文化思想学习纲要》的通知[A].中共中央宣传部.习近平文化思想学习纲要[M].北京:学习出版社、人民出版社,2024.1-2.
[9] 习近平. 加快建设文化强国[J].求是,2025,(8):4-8.
[10] Alfred Louis Kroeber,Clyde Kluckhorn.Culture:A Criti-cal Review of Concepts and Definitions[M].New York:Kr-aus Reprint Company,1952.291.
[11] 林坚. 文化学轨迹[M].北京:中国书籍出版社,2019.
[12] (德)黑格尔.历史哲学[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2001.285.
[13] Edward B.Tylor. Primitive Culture[M].London:John.Mu-rray,1871.1.
[14] 赵常林,林娅.马克思主义文化学[M].香港:中国文化书院,1988.2.
[15] 毛泽东. 新民主主义论[A].毛泽东选集(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1991.663-664.
[16] 钱学森. 研究社会主义精神财富创造事业的学问——文化学[J].中国社会科学,1982,(6):89-96.
[17] 王文章. 中国先进文化论[M].北京:文化艺术出版社,2004.258-259.