基于互动仪式理论的数字阅读空间营造

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (691 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Digital reading spaces are virtual interactive fields composed of countless integrated interaction rituals. Interaction rituals are important mechanisms for consolidating readers’ emotions and empowering reading behaviors. Analyzing digital reading spaces from the perspective of interaction ritual theory helps promote the regeneration and expansion of reading behaviors, stimulate the potential value of reading activities, and create a rich social culture atmosphere.Taking interaction rituals as the starting point, and based on the dimensions of existence, legitimacy, and foreground, a dimensional system for digital reading spaces is constructed. Selected four digital reading spaces—WeRead, Fanqie Novel, LOFTER, and Cheng Guang—as research cases and found that the digital reading space is composed of multiple functional sections, and each section relies on its attributes and characteristics to drive the generation of emotional energy in the space, forming spatial forms that nurture the high emotional energy, which is specifically manifested “group unity spaces” “open interaction spaces” “focal core spaces” among eight other spatial modes. Based on the differentiated paths and practical experiences of creating spaces such as mobile library platforms, online literature reading platforms, and community reading platforms, digital reading spaces can unleash their developmental potential and promote knowledge sharing and emotional flow through strategies such as “innovating interactive mechanisms and establish emotional connections” “extracting elements of recognition and lay out moderate rules” and “releasing hidden emotions and maintain a neighborly environment”, thereby constructing a healthier digital reading interactive ecosystem.

Key words： digital reading space interaction ritual spatial creation emotional energy symbolic capital

Received: 07 August 2025

PACS:

G124

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Bo
	WANG Chu-qiao

Cite this article:

CHEN Bo,WANG Chu-qiao. The Creation of Digital Reading Space Based on Interaction Ritual Theory[J]. , 2026, 43(2): 57-68.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2026/V43/I2/57

[1] 中国新闻出版研究院.第二十二次全国国民阅读调查成果发布[EB/OL].https://www.nationalreading.gov.cn/wzzt/2025qmyddh/cgfb/202504/t20250424_892768.html,2025-12-24.
[2] (美)柯林斯.互动仪式链[M].林聚任,王鹏,宋丽君译.北京:商务印书馆,2012.
[3] 姜洪伟. 数字阅读概念辨析及其类型特征[J].图书馆理论与实践,2013,(9):9-11.
[4] Li Y F, Yan L L.Which Reading Comprehension is Better? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Paper Versus Digital Reading in Recent 20 Years[J].Telematics and In-formatics Reports,2024,14:100142.
[5] 吴礼志,洪星.有声阅读与数字阅读、纸质阅读对照实验研究——阅读效果及认知负荷差异比较[J].图书情报工作,2024,68(9):56-64.
[6] 孙祺宇,李菲.元宇宙视角下数字阅读持续使用意愿研究[J].图书情报工作,2023,67(22):23-34.
[7] 张文亮,李晶.数字青年数字阅读付费意愿的影响因素与服务改进策略研究[J].情报资料工作,2022,43(4):61-70.
[8] Yin Z K, Zhang Z Q, Ren T.Beyond Surface: Chinese Youth’s Digital Reading Motivation Explored Via Ladd-ering and the Interpretative Structural Modeling Method (ISM)[J].Library&Information Science Research,2024,46(3):101314.
[9] 徐孝娟,赵宇翔,朱庆华.从传统纸媒到数字媒介的用户阅读转移行为研究——基于MEC理论的探索[J].中国图书馆学报,2016,42(3):116-127.
[10] 李淼,魏文秀.空间“可阅读”:数字阅读实践中的空间重构与价值再释[J].出版科学,2022,30(4):92-98.
[11] 张美娟,苏华雨,王萌.数字阅读空间中的信息流动、情感凝聚与虚拟互动[J].出版科学,2023,31(2):47-55.
[12] Cho H, Adkins D, Long A K.Understanding the Reader Demographics of An Emerging Online Reading Platform, Webtoon[J].Journal of Documentation,2025,81(2):351-358.
[13] Fernandes W R, Cendón B V.A Study of Non-Users of Digital Libraries: The Case of the Capes Digital Library in Brazil[J].Electronic Library,2021,39(5):661-667.
[14] Turner V.From Ritual to Theater:The Human Serious-ness of Play[M].New York:PAJ Publications,1982.79.
[15] (英)鲍伊.宗教人类学导论[M].金泽译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004,151.
[16] 郭霄鹏,郭艺萍.微信读书APP的互动仪式链解析[J].传媒,2020,(12):91-93.
[17] 连婷婷,袁曦临.基于互动仪式链理论的虚拟阅读社区研究——以豆瓣读书会小组为例[J].图书馆工作与研究,2023,(8):59-64+89.
[18] 李菁. 抖音短视频传播中的互动仪式与情感动员[J].新闻与写作,2019,(7):86-89.
[19] 於流芳. 全媒体视阈下微信互动传播研究——基于“互动仪式链”理论[J].传媒,2015,(11):71-72.
[20] 徐鑫亮,于泽卉,孟蕊.新媒体环境下消费者互动、品牌情感与购买行为——基于互动仪式链理论的分析[J].商业研究,2018,(7):24-32.
[21] 强月新,孙志鹏.互动仪式链理论范式下官员直播带货现象分析[J].编辑之友,2020,(10):21-26.
[22] 邓昕. 互动仪式链视角下的弹幕视频解析——以Bili-bili网为例[J].新闻界,2015,(13):14-19.
[23] Cottingham M D.Interaction Ritual Theory and Sports Fans:Emotion,Symbols,and Solidarity[J].Sociology of Sp-ort Journal,2012,29(2):168-185.
[24] Joden H, Strandell J.Building Viewer Engagement thr-ough Interaction Rituals on Twitch.tv[J].Information Co-mmunication and Society,2021,25(13):1969-1986.
[25] Yantseva V,Vega D,Magnani M.Immigrant-Critical Alte-rnative Media in Online Conversations[J].PLoS ONE,2023, 18(11).
[26] Yang S, Tang J R, Cai J, et al.Effects of Online Brand Community Rituals on Customer Citizenship Behavior:Exploring the Sequential Mediation Mechanism[J].Journ-al of Product and Brand Management,2023,32(3):393-405.
[27] Droppe A.Emotional Ambience in Interaction Rituals: A Conceptional Completion to Emotional Energy[J].Social Sciences-Basel,2023,12(9):509.
[28] Kallio P,T rnberg A. Rituals of Resentment: How Dark Emotional Energy Fuels Incel Identity and Solidarity[J].Acta Sociologica,2025,68(3):287-304.
[29] (美)欧文·戈夫曼.日常生活中的自我呈现[M].冯钢译.北京:北京大学出版社,2008.19.
[30] 陶克涛,张术丹,赵云辉.什么决定了政府公共卫生治理绩效?——基于QCA方法的联动效应研究[J].管理世界,2021,37(5):128-138+156+10.
[31] 张明,蓝海林,陈伟宏,等.殊途同归不同效:战略变革前因组态及其绩效研究[J].管理世界,2020,36(9):168-186.
[32] 贺子岳,唐伶俐.中国网络文学出版研究[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2022,165.
[33] 褚诗雨,胡泳.互动仪式链与“圈地自萌”——网易LO-FTER同人圈的民族志研究[J].新闻爱好者,2024,(6):10-20.
[34] (美)安德森.想象的共同体:民族主义的起源与散布[M].吴叡人译.上海:上海人民出版社,2016,6.