非决策能力下基层政府回应行为的特征、模式及机制

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (589 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Government response has the dual attributes of legitimacy and effectiveness, and is a composite of government-public interaction and grass-roots governance. “Non-decision-making capacity” refers to the ability of a power subject to manipulate and guide agenda-setting, interest challenges and potential risks before making decisions. When confronted with the demands and needs of the people, the power subject has the ability to place a particular issue in the decision-making discussion or exclude it from the scope of decision-making by exerting influence, so as to achieve the purpose of risk avoidance, cost reduction, and rationalisation. Non-decision-making ability is influenced by the combination of top-down political pressure, bottom-up public supervision, and autonomous space in the internal and external environments. Under the effect of non-decision-making capacity, the response behavior of the grassroots government is shaped by the characteristics of risk avoidance through the imbalance of power and responsibility, cost-benefit through the calculation of interests, and smoothness through the decomposition of pressure. According to the different states of non-decision-making capacity, the grassroots government flexibly chooses the response behaviors of indifference, procedural reply, moderate negotiation, and transactional communication between the strong and the weak. The influencing factors of non-decision-making capacity, the characteristics of grass-roots government's response behavior and the response types corresponding to non-decision-making capacity together constitute the mechanism of grass-roots government's choice of response behavior.

Key words： non-decision-making capability grassroots government government responsiveness response behavior selection response effectiveness

Received: 18 December 2023

PACS:

D630

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Yong-hua
	XIAO Chuan-long

Cite this article:

LI Yong-hua,XIAO Chuan-long. The Characteristics, Patterns and Mechanisms of Response Behaviors of Grassroots Governments under Non-decision-making Capacity[J]. , 2024, 41(2): 87-96.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2024/V41/I2/87

[1] (美)格罗弗·斯塔林.公共部门管理[M].陈宪等译.上海:上海译文出版社,2003.132.
[2] Binzer Hobolt S, Klemmensen R.Government Respon-siveness and Political Competition in Comparative Pers-pective[J].Comparative Political Studies,2008,(3):309-337.
[3] Mulgan R.“Accountability”:An Ever-expanding Concept?[J].Public Administration,2000,(3):555-573.
[4] Chen J, Pan J, Xu Y.Sources of Authoritarian Respon-siveness:A Field Experiment in China[J].American Journal of Political Science,2016,(2):383-400.
[5] Cai Y, Zhou T.Online Political Participation in China: Lo-cal Government and Differentiated Response[J].The China Quarterly,2019,(238):331-352.
[6] Zhu J, Chertow M R.Authoritarian but Responsive: Local Regulation of Industrial Energy Efficiency in Jiangsu, China[J].Regulation & Governance,2019,(3):384-404.
[7] 孙宗锋,姜楠.政府部门回应策略及其逻辑研究:以J市政务热线满意度考核为例[J].中国行政管理,2021,(5):40-46.
[8] 陈国权,陈杰.论责任政府的回应性[J].浙江社会科学,2008,(11):36-41+126.
[9] 韩旭. 建设“回应型”政府:治理形式主义的一条政策思路[J].人民论坛,2018,(1):38-39.
[10] (美)罗伯特·达尔.谁统治?一个美国城市的民主和权力[M].范春辉,张宇译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2010.96.
[11] Bachrach P, Baratz M S.Power and Its Two Faces Revisited: A Reply to Geoffrey Debnam[J].American Political Science Review,1975,(3):900-904.
[12] (美)史蒂文·卢克斯.权力:一种激进的观点[M].彭斌译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2008.7.
[13] Bachrach P, Baratz M S.Decisions and Nondecisions:An Analytical Framework[J].American Political Science Re-view,1963,(3):632-642.
[14] Bachrach P, Baratz M S.Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice[M].New York: Oxford University Press.1970.44.
[15] 曹正汉.中国上下分治的治理体制及其稳定机制[J].社会学研究,2011,(1):1-40+243.
[16] 黄冬娅.压力传递与政策执行波动:以A省X产业政策执行为例[J].政治学研究,2020,(6):104-116+128.
[17] 杨志军. 中央聚合—地方封闭政策体制及其更新:国家治理现代化的政治资源再造[J].学术月刊,2022,(1):98-111.
[18] 王汉生,王一鸽.目标管理责任制:农村基层政权的实践逻辑[J].社会学研究,2009,(2):61-92+244.
[19] 庞明礼. 领导高度重视:一种科层运作的注意力分配方式[J].中国行政管理,2019,(4):93-99.
[20] 邓大才.乡村建设行动中的农民参与:从阶梯到框架[J].探索,2021,(4):26-37+2.
[21] 熊万胜.基层自主性何以可能:关于乡村集体企业兴衰现象的制度分析[J].社会学研究,2010,(3):48-81+244.
[22] 方珂,张翔,蒋卓余等.从“自保式执行”到有效治理:地方自主性实践的制度路径转换[J].社会学研究,2023,(2):158-181+229.
[23] 杨磊. 返场、控制与捆绑:乡镇干部的压力源及其解释[J].公共管理与政策评论,2020,(1):63-72.
[24] 田先红. 基层政府卸责行为的逻辑及其治理[J].求索,2021,(5):96-101.
[25] 鲁敏. 地方政府权责失衡的基本逻辑[J].中共中央党校学报,2015,(6):48-54.
[26] 邓小平. 邓小平文选(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1993.284.
[27] (德)马克斯·韦伯.经济与社会[M].林荣远译.北京:商务印书馆,1997.324.
[28] 王雨磊.缘情治理:扶贫送温暖中的情感秩序[J].中国行政管理,2018,(5):96-101.
[29] 金江峰. 调控型政权:乡镇运作及其治理实践[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,(3):115-126.
[30] 赵静,薛澜.回应式议程设置模式:基于中国公共政策转型一类案例的分析[J].政治学研究,2017,(3):42-51+126.
[31] 马雪松,肖传龙.在“关注”与“应付”之间:注意力分配视角下的基层政府回应逻辑[J].治理研究,2023,(2):94-108+159.
[32] Lindblom C. E.The Science of “Muddling Through”[J]. Public Administration Review,1959,(2):79-88.
[33] Simon H A.Administrative Behavior: A Study of Dec-ision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations[M].New York: The Free Press.1997.85.