|
|
|
| The Social Status, Realistic Dilemmas and the Optimization of Governance of Autism Children in China |
| TANG Zhao-yun, LIU Ke-cheng |
| School of Politics and Public Administration, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou, Fujian, 362021 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As a large social group with mental disabilities in China, children with autism face many problems in their daily life and social participation. Manifested as insufficient investment at the national government level and weak external supervision; At the level of market economy, the rational thinking of “economic people” contradicts the concept of social service, and the standardization of the special education system is insufficient; Insufficient awareness at the family level, limited financial capacity, etc. To overcome the difficulties and dilemmas of the social problems of children with autism, it is necessary to optimize the social support and social security of the group of children with autism, so that the state (government), the market (society), and the family can work together to optimize and improve from five aspects: firstly, increase the funding investment of the state and local governments in specialized public schools for autism, and provide policy support and protection for the basic rights of children with autism; The second is to promote the establishment of “public and private” school institutions, strengthen the monitoring, management, and performance evaluation of private autism schools by the state and government; The third is to cultivate specialized teachers for autism, providing practical and feasible professional guarantees for the rehabilitation diagnosis, treatment, and educational intervention of children with autism; The fourth is to do a good job in building the employee system, avoid the situation of high mobility and difficulty in introducing, so that autism schools can “use the right people” and “use good people”; The fifth is to combine parents’ learning of relevant knowledge with increasing knowledge popularization in society, and improve the social public welfare service network and social assistance pattern.
|
|
Received: 20 August 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 段桂琴.孤独症儿童家庭支持及社区融合[J].河南预防医学杂志,2015,26(1):24-26+29.
[2] 李学会. 我国面向自闭症者及家庭的社会政策:议程及展望[J].社会福利(理论版),2019,(10):12-18.
[3] 卫生部办公厅关于印发《儿童孤独症诊疗康复指南》卫办医政发(2010)123号[EB/OL].https://ishare.iask.sina.com.cn/f/5tlczQDfzJH.html,2023-01-26.
[4] 么岚,苗正达.孤独症儿童的保护现状与我国立法保护的可行性研究[J].中国青年政治学院学报,2012,31(3):109-112.
[5] 中国残疾人联合会.关于使用2010年末全国残疾人总数及各类、不同残疾等级人数的通知(残联〔2012〕25号)[EB/OL].https://www.toutiao.com/article/6596146687029281284/?wid=1699356402155,2023-09-26.
[6] 林闽钢.福利多元主义的兴起及其政策实践[J].社会,2002,(7).
[7] 同春芬,张越.福利多元主义理论研究综述[J].社会福利(理论版),2018,(5):8-13.
[8] 张务农. 福利三角框架下的高等教育福利制度研究[J].东南学术,2014,(3):138-143.
[9] 刘柳. 预防女性弱势群体犯罪:基于福利三角理论的社会政策研究[J].中国行政管理,2015,(11):105-109.
[10] 王洛忠,张艺君.福利三角理论视角下延迟退休年龄政策选择分析[J].理论探讨,2016,(4):132-137+2.
[11] 李丹. 福利三角理论视角下农村家长教育期望影响因素研究——基于中国教育追踪调查数据(CEPS)2013—2014年数据的分析[J].当代教育论坛,2021,(3):115-124.
[12] 吴扬,王雁.特殊教育学校德育的背景、需求及路径探析[J].中国特殊教育,2022,(6):9-15.
[13] 教育部.2022年全国教育事业发展统计公报[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/sjzl_fztjgb/202307/t20230705_1067278.html,2023-07-05.
[14] 刘劭菲,陈妙盈,黄宝琴等.孤独症儿童的家庭管理特征潜在类别及其影响因素分析[J].军事护理,2023,40(8):25-29.
[15] 程大发.中国约有近300万孤独症儿童,康复教育人才缺口达30万[EB/OL].https://www.sohu.com/a/534948861_313745,2023-06-03.
[16] 教育部关于公布2022年度普通高等学校本科专业备案和审批结果的通知[EB/OL].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/moe_1034/s4930/202304/t20230419_1056224.html,2023-06-19.
[17] 梁小华,刘静涛,刘友学等.重庆市孤独症儿童治疗与社会保障研究[J].中国卫生事业管理,2015,32(2).
[18] 余诗雨,艾戎,赵新玲等.贵州省孤独症儿童诊治情况及其家庭现状调查[J].贵州医科大学学报,2023,48(3):329-334.
[19] 程楠. “公建民营”式康复基地让孤独症儿童和家庭走出困境[J].中国社会组织,2018,(9):44.
[20] 全国特殊教育专任教师达到6.9万人[EB/OL].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1743693498857914507&wfr=spider&for=pc,2023-02-12. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 40 
