宋明儒学道统论的三种谱系及派系特征

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (5)

Download: PDF (586 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The Confucian thought in Song and Ming dynasties is roughly divided into three schools, Neo-Confucianism, philosophy of mind and qiology. Neo-Confucianism constructed an orthodoxy pedigree from Yao, Shun and Yu to Confucius and Mencius, which was finally continued by Neo Confucianism. This pedigree constitutes the main axis of Confucian orthodoxy in Song and Ming dynasties. Philosophy of mind revised Neo-Confucianism and had following characteristics. In terms of the status of thinkers, it stressed the importance of Yan Hui and philosophers of mind. In terms of the approaches of “pursuing Tao(道)”, it extorted simplicity. As a highly theoretical academic school, qiology attacked both Neo-Confucianism and philosophy of mind. It presented three arguments. Firstly, Confucian thought is an open system that should be inherited from many aspects rather than monopolized by any school. Secondly, Confucian thought serves national governance, and is thus highly practical. Finally, in terms of classics qiology elevated Liu Jing (The Six Classics) over Si Shu (The Four Books). On balance, Neo-Confucianism, philosophy of mind, and qiology are all based on theories and each has its own characteristics, which reflects the diverse development of Confucian thought in Song and Ming dynasties.

Key words： Confucian thought of Song and Ming dynasties Neo-Confucianism philosophy of mind qiology politics in Song and Ming dynasties

Received: 05 September 2021

PACS:	B244
	B248

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHOU Lei

Cite this article:

ZHOU Lei. The Three Schools of Confucian Thought in Song and Ming Dynasties and Their Characteristics[J]. , 2021, 38(6): 15-23.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2021/V38/I6/15

[1] 朱汉民.宋儒道统论与士大夫的主体意识[J].哲学研究,2018,(10):71-78+129.
[2] 韩愈. 韩愈文集汇校笺注[M].刘真伦,岳珍点校.北京:中华书局,2010.
[3] 欧阳修. 欧阳修全集[M].李逸安点校.北京:中华书局,2001.288-289.
[4] 李焘. 续资治通鉴长编[M].上海师范大学古籍整理所,华东师范大学古籍整理所点校.北京:中华书局,2004. 5370.
[5] 程颢,程颐.二程集[M].王孝鱼点校.北京:中华书局,2004.
[6] 朱熹. 朱子全书2版(修订版)(第24册)[M].朱杰人,严佐之,刘永翔主编.上海:上海古籍出版社,合肥:安徽教育出版社,2010.
[7] 朱熹. 朱子全书2版(修订版)(第6册)[M].朱杰人,严佐之,刘永翔主编.上海:上海古籍出版社,合肥:安徽教育出版社,2010.
[8] 朱熹. 朱子全书2版(修订版)(第21册)[M].朱杰人,严佐之,刘永翔主编.上海:上海古籍出版社,合肥:安徽教育出版社,2010.1583.
[9] 陈淳. 北溪大全集[A].纪昀,永瑢等.景印文渊阁四库全书(第1168册)[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.758.
[10] 黄进兴.优入圣域:权力、信仰与正当性[M].北京:中华书局,2010.
[11] 吕妙芬. 历史转型中的明代心学[A].陈弱水.中国史新论(思想史分册)[M].台北:“中央研究院”、联经出版事业股份有限公司,2012.320.
[12] 吕妙芬. 阳明学士人社群——历史、思想与实践[M].台北:“中央研究院”近代史研究所,2003.31-71.
[13] 王守仁. 王阳明全集[M].吴光等编校.上海:上海古籍出版社,2011.
[14] 王畿. 王畿集[M].吴震编校整理.南京:凤凰出版社,2007.
[15] 罗汝芳.罗汝芳集(上册)[M].方祖猷,梁一群,李庆龙等整理.南京:凤凰出版社,2007.234.
[16] 周磊. 从《圣学心法》看君权对儒学的吸收与改造[J].广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,(4):39-45.
[17] (日)荻生徂徕.荻生徂徕全集(第1册)[M].(日)岛田虔次编辑.东京:みすず書房,1973.282.
[18] (日)伊藤仁斋,(日)伊藤东涯.伊藤仁斋·东涯[M].东京:日本図書センター,1979.152-153.
[19] 罗钦顺.困知记(卷下)[M].阎韬点校.北京:中华书局,2013.43.
[20] 周磊. “气质”人性论的理论特质——以王廷相对“生之谓性”的阐发为中心[J].现代哲学,2020,(2):131-136.
[21] 王廷相.王廷相集(第三册)[M].王孝鱼点校.北京:中华书局,1989.
[22] 王廷相.王廷相集(第二册)[M].王孝鱼点校.北京:中华书局,1989.399.
[23] 余英时. 朱熹的历史世界:宋代士大夫政治文化的研究[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2011.
[24] 张亨.思文论集:儒道思想的现代诠释[M].台北:台湾大学出版中心,2014.257.
[25] 杨儒宾. 从《五经》到《新五经》[M].台北:台湾大学出版中心,2013.51.