人工智能视野下医疗损害责任规则的适用和嬗变

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (9)

Download: PDF (520 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Medical treatment is the earliest, fastest growing and most special field in which artificial intelligence is used. Countries around the world respond to it through legislation. Artificial intelligence is quietly changing the medical decision-making process and the results. The mode of “AI decision-making + doctor reviewing” will become a regular practice, which will have strong impact on conventional medical damage liability rules. The autonomy of AI makes it more difficult for victims to seek relief according to current rules. The special legal position of medical artificial intelligence and the principle of differential treatment also require appropriate adjustment of current medical damage liability rules in China. With weak AI, we should increase the items of legal presumption of fault, reduce the standard for causality proof, adjust the subject of medical product liability, set up statutory presumptive items for defect proof and appropriately adjust exemption items. With strong artificial intelligence, we should adopt fault and causality presumption system, set up compulsory medical liability insurance, medical product compulsory liability insurance and compensation fund to ensure adequate and timely compensation for victims and social dispersion of risks.

Key words： artificial intelligence medical damage principle of differential treatment liability of product medical risk sharing

Received: 18 August 2019

PACS:

DF523.9

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Run-sheng
	SHI Biao

Cite this article:

LI Run-sheng,SHI Biao. Application and Adjustment of Medical Damage Liability Rules from Perspective of Artificial Intelligence[J]. , 2019, 36(6): 91-99.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2019/V36/I6/91

[1] 普华永道.全球AI报告:探索人工智能革命[EB/OL]. https://www.pwccn.com/zh/industries/healthcare.html,2019-01-21.
[2] 王璟瑜,王盼.人工智能将如何改变医疗行业[N].金融时报(中文版),2019-01-08(001).
[3] 曹建峰. 10大建议！看欧盟如何预测AI立法新趋势[J].机器人产业,2017,(2):16-20.
[4] J.Frazee,M.Finley.M-Health and Underregulated Data: Is This Farewell To Patient Privacy?[J].Indiana Health Law Review,2016,(11):385-414.
[5] 徐文. 反思与优化:人工智能时代法律人格赋予标准论[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2018,(7):100-110.
[6] 袁曾. 人工智能有限法律人格审视[J].东方法学,2017,(5):50-57.
[7] 郭少飞. “电子人”法律主体论[J].东方法学,2018,(3):39-49.
[8] 杨立新. 用现行民法规则解决人工智能法律调整问题的尝试[J].中州学刊,2018,(7):40-49.
[9] 司晓,曹建峰.论人工智能的民事责任:以自动驾驶汽车和智能机器人为切入点[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2017,(5):166-173.
[10] 杨立新. 人工类人格:智能机器人的民法地位——兼论智能机器人致人损害的民事责任[J].求是学刊,2018,(4):84-96.
[11] 赵西巨. 我国《侵权责任法》中的医疗产品责任立法之反思——以商品与服务二分法为视角[J].东方法学,2013,(2):90-103.
[12] 潘峰.阿尔法狗之争[N].中国电子报,2017-11-21(006).
[13] 张新宝. 侵权责任法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016.220-223.
[14] (英)哈里·柯林斯,(英)特雷弗·平奇.勾勒姆医生—作为科学的医学与作为救助手段的医学[M].上海:上海世纪出版集团,2009.35.
[15] 健康点,飞利浦.中国医疗人工智能产业报告[EB/OL]. http://www.healthpoint.cn/report,2019-01-22.
[16] 杨立新. 侵权责任法[M].北京:法律出版社,2018.218-219.
[17] Draft Report with Recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics Article 59[EB/OL].https://ec.europa.eu/,2019-01-20.
[18] 杨立新,朱呈义.动物法律人格之否定——兼论动物之法律“物格”[J].法学研究,2004,(5):86-102.
[19] (美)亚历克斯·斯坦.证据法的根基[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2018.172.
[20] 温世扬. 保险法[M].北京:法律出版社,2016.11.
[21] 袁和静,张涛,李润生.医疗风险分担保险功能有待深挖[N].健康报,2019-01-24(006).