Abstract：Since 1988, China and Japan have been the two countries which provided the most official supports to Myanmar, which is significant in promoting the economic and social development in Myanmar. Nevertheless, there are obvious differences in concepts of aid, forms of aid and fields of aid between China and Japan. In terms of concepts, China emphasizes on the of non-interference principle in internal affairs, while Japan insists on the principle that aid is connected with politics. In fields of aid, China focuses on large-scale infrastructure reconstruction, while Japan focuses on assistance to improve people's livelihood. As for forms of aid, China and Japan have little difference. China tends to provide supports on the governmental level and complete the supports mainly through enterprises, paying little attention to publicity; While Japan tends to offer governmental assistance to private sectors and meet their goals mainly through NGOs, paying much attention to publicity. By contrast, we find China and Japan both attach great importance to assistance to Burma and their assistance have their own characteristics. However, Findings from data analysis show that Japan’s aid generally has better effect on Burma than that of China. Therefore, in addition to maintaining our own advantages, China should also draw on Japan's experience, focusing on improving aid mechanism, shifting priority, enriching aid patterns, and making more publicity efforts to improve effect of our aid to Myanmar.
罗圣荣. 1988年以来中日官方对缅甸援助比较与启示[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2018, 35(1): 79-86.
LUO Sheng-rong. Comparison between Official Aid from China and Japan since 1988 and its Revelation. , 2018, 35(1): 79-86.
[1] DAC, Development Co-operation, 1991 Report[M].Paris: OECD, 1991, p.257. [2] 沈丹阳.官方发展援助：作用、意义与目标[J].国际经济合作,2005,（9）：30. [3] 戴永红,曾凯.2010年以来日本对缅甸官方发展援助政策的新特点及其制约性因素[J].日本研究,2016,（3）：44. [4] Edstr,m and Bert.Japan and the Myanmar conundrum, Institute for Security and Development Policy[DB/OL]. http://pwvb.rit-alumni.info/japan_and_the_myanmar_conundrum_-_?nal.pdf.2009. [5] 吴哥哥莱,李晨阳.中国国际社会责任与缅甸个案研究[M].北京：中国社会科学出版社,2016.128. [6] Lex Rieffel and James W. Fox.Too Much, Too Soon? The Dilemma of Foreign Aid to Myanmar/Burma[DB/OL].http://www.burmapartnership.org/2013/03/too-much-too-soon-the-dilemma-of-foreign-aid-to-myanmar-burma/. [7] Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan.Japan’s Assistance to Myanmar（March, 2015）[DB/OL].http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asiapaci/myanmar/. [8] 阮俊英,何艳红,马金案.冷战后日本对湄公河次区域5国的官方发展援助(ODA)[J].东南亚纵横,2011,（10）：56-57. [9] Khen Suan Khai.Japan’sOfficial DevelopmentAssistance Diplomacy towards Burma in Post2012[M].University Academic Service Centre(UNISERV), Chiang Mai University, Thailand, 24-25,July,2015, p.7. [10] 黄梅波,任培强.中国对外援助:政策演变及未来趋势[J].国际经济合作,2012,（3）：83. [11] 黄梅波.中国对外援助机制:现状和趋势[J].国际经济合作,2007,（6）：7. [12] 吴丹.中日对非援助的比较研究[M].长沙：湖南师范大学,2012.38. [13] 陈致宇.日本对东南亚国家的政府发展援助[M].北京：政治大学外交研究所,2000.31-35. [14] Lex Rieffel and James W. Fox.Too Much, Too Soon? The Dilemma of Foreign Aid to Myanmar/Burma[DB/OL].http://www.burmapartnership.org/2013/03/too-much-too-soon-the-dilemma-of-foreign-aid-to-myanmar-burma/. [15] Joshua Kurlantzick.Charm Offensive: How China's Soft Power is Transforming the World[M].New Heaven and London: Yale University Press, 2007, p.98. [16] The White House.The National Security Strategy of the United States of America[M].Washington, DC., 2002. [17] 宋梁禾,吴仪君.中国对缅甸援助的现状及建议[J].国际经济合作,2013,（7）：67.
2018, Vol. 35 
粤公网安备44030502007936号