Political and Social Dynamics, Risks, and Prevention of ChatGPT
ZHANG Xia-heng1,2
1. School of Management, Northwest University of Political Science and Law, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710122; 2. Research Center for Foreign-related Rule of Law, Northwest University of Political Science and Law, Xi'an,Shaanxi, 710122
Abstract：As a human-computer conversation application based on a large scale artificial intelligence model, the wide application of ChatGPT will have a lot of influence on the political society. ChatGPT has strong political and social momentum, and its embedding in multiple social fields and application scenarios will make the political society face both opportunities and risks, resulting in continuous technological evolution and iteration, ushering in more humanized alternatives, and multi-dimensional and deep changes. At the same time, ChatGPT poses political and social risks. In terms of political risks, the data flow during the use of ChatGPT will impact national sovereignty and independence, digital technology hegemony may impact political security, and ideological security may face penetration risks. In terms of social risks, employment structure, social communication, ethics, population safety and other areas may create new risks due to ChatGPT. Faced with the potential political and social risks of ChatGPT, we should guard against it under the guidance of the overall national security concept, and uphold the principles of encouraging development, guaranteeing safety, technical regulation and coordinated supervision. Specifically, we should adhere to the concept of development and security, and accelerate the construction of a safe ecology for ChatGPT development; Adhere to the positive guidance and effective governance, and accelerate the ChatGPT collaborative supervision system; Adhere to the technical regulation and legislative protection, and accelerate the purification of ChatGPT risk prevention environment.
张夏恒. ChatGPT的政治社会动能、风险及防范[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2023, 40(3): 5-8.
ZHANG Xia-heng. Political and Social Dynamics, Risks, and Prevention of ChatGPT. , 2023, 40(3): 5-8.
[1] Van Dis Eva A M., Bollen J., Zuidema W.et al. ChatGPT: Five Priorities for Research[J].Nature,2023,(9):224-226. [2] 张夏恒. 基于新一代人工智能技术(ChatGPT)的数字经济发展研究[J].长安大学学报(社会科学版),2023,25(3):1-10. [3] 王建磊,曹卉萌. ChatGPT 的传播特质、逻辑、范式[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023,40(2):147-152. [4] 钱力,刘熠,张智雄等.ChatGPT的技术基础分析[J].数据分析与知识发现,2023,7(3):6-15. [5] 周智博. ChatGPT 模型引入我国数字政府建设:功能、风险及其规制[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,(3):144-154. [6] (美)汉斯·摩根索.国家间政治:权力斗争与和平[M].徐昕,郝望,李保平译.北京:北京大学出版社,2006.342. [7] 蔡翠红. 大变局时代的技术霸权与“超级权力”悖论[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2019,(14):17-31. [8] 王少. ChatGPT介入思想政治教育的技术线路、安全风险及防范[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023,40(2):153-160. [9] Raboin B.Corresponding Evolution: International Law and the Emergence of Cyber Warfare[J].Journal of the Na-tional Association of Administrative Law Judiciary,2011, 31(2):603-666. [10] Black J.Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes[J].Regulation & Governance, 2008,(2):137-164.
2023, Vol. 40 
粤公网安备44030502007936号