新区域主义理论下粤港澳大湾区公共品供给的协同治理路径

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (573 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Chinese government launched the Greater Bay Area development strategy to build a world-class urban agglomeration and quality life in this region. The key to the implementation of this strategy lies in increasing collaborative governance among the governments and communities in public goods supply, enhancing coordination of public policies, achieving more balanced development of public service within the region, and improving the core competitiveness of regional development. At present, the system difference within this region has adverse effects on regional integration and development. New regionalism theory emphasizes regional members spontaneously form a regional alliance for common interests, and attaches great importance to the pluralistic behavior subjects involving “state, market and society”to better address the issue that the vertical system of metropolitan governments cannot operate effectively in the regional coordinated development of urban agglomerations. From the perspective of new regionalism, in regional collaborative governance of public goods supply, we should attach importance to the regional joint planning and coordination in the Greater Bay Area and the top-level design of the development within the region, explore the use of leased land as an important legal means of regional integration, establish a parallel social security system to make “social security portable” for cross-border workers, and bring the greatest convenience to the flow of human resource elements. Besides, we should expand cross-border public services for the elderly in Hong Kong and Macao through a collaborative approach to address the aging population within the region. In addition, we need to draw on the advantages of Hong Kong and Macao to cultivate developed production relation supporting social networks, and attach importance to collaborative development of talents.

Key words： new regionalism Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area public goods supply urban agglomeration collaborative governance

Received: 02 July 2019

PACS:	D67
	F127

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHANG Shu-jian
	HUANG Wei-ping

Cite this article:

ZHANG Shu-jian,HUANG Wei-ping. Collaborative Governance of Public Goods Supply in the Greater Bay Area from the Perspective of New Regionalism[J]. , 2020, 37(1): 42-49.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2020/V37/I1/42

[1] 乔纳森·S·戴维斯.城市政治学理论前沿(第二版)[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2013.135-136.
[2] 崔晶. 都市圈地方政府协作治理[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2015.21-22.
[3] 苏长和. 中国地方政府与次区域合作:动力、行为及机制[J].世界经济与政治,2010,(5):20-21.
[4] 殷为华. 新区域主义理论——中国区域规划新视角[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2013.
[5] 袁政. 新区域主义及其对我国的启示[J].政治学研究,2011,(2):103.
[6] Brenner Neil.New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2004.176-177.
[7] 曹海军, 霍伟桦.城市治理理论的范式转换及其对中国的启示[J].中国行政管理,2013,(7):96.
[8] Stephen P Osborne, Zoe Radnor, Greta Nasi.A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a Service-Dominant Approach[J]. American Review of Public Administration,2012,43(2):202-203.
[9] 杨道田. 新区域主义视野下的中国区域治理:问题与反思[J].当代财经,2010,(3):91.
[10] 叶林. 新区域主义的兴起与发展:一个综述[J].公共行政评论,2010,(3):178-179.
[11] H.V. Savitch, Ronald K. Vogel. Paths to New Regionalism[J]. State & Local Government Review, 2000,32(3):162-163.
[12] Altshuler Alan, Morri William.Governance and Opportunity in Metropolitan American[M]. DC: National Academy Press,1999.135.
[13] 张紧跟. 论粤港澳大湾区建设中的区域一体化转型[J].学术研究,2018,(7):63.
[14] 王晨, 罗思东.美国新城市化时期的地方政府[M].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2011.75-76.
[15] 罗思东. 城市区域理论及其政策导向[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,(3):6.
[16] 蔡赤萌. 粤港澳大湾区城市群建设的战略意义和现实挑战[J].广东社会科学,2017,(4):12.
[17] 叶林. 城市扩张中的公共服务均等化困境[J].学术研究,2016,(2):70.
[18] 锁利铭. 面向府际协作的城市群治理:趋势、特征与未来取向[J].经济社会体制比较,2016,(6):14.
[19] Karen Mossberger, Gerry Stoker.The Evolution of Urban Regime Theory: the challenge of conceptualization[J]. Urban Affairs Review, 2001,36(6):119-120.
[20] Shen J. ,Luo X. From Fortress Hong Kong to Hong Kong-Shenzhen Metropolis: the emergence of government-led strategy for regional integration in Hong Kong[J]. Journal of Contemporary China,2013,22(84):76-77.
[21] 董皞. 特区租管地:一种区域合作法律制度创新模式[J].中国法学,2015,(1):160-161.
[22] 吴瑞坚. 新区域主义兴起与区域治理范式转变[J].中国名城,2013,(12):6.
[23] 刘云刚, 侯璐璐,许志桦.粤港澳大湾区跨境区域协调:现状、问题与展望[J].城市观察, 2018,(1):21.
[24] 席恒,翟绍果.养老保险可携性研究:现状、问题与趋势[J].社会保障研究,2013,(1):79-80.
[25] 王佃利,王玉龙,苟晓曼.区域公共物品视角下的城市群合作治理机制研究[J].中国行政管理,2015,(9):8.
[26] 田新朝. 跨境养老服务:粤港澳大湾区的协同合作[J].开放导报,2017,(5):110-111.
[27] 汪伟全. 区域合作中地方利益冲突的治理模式:比较与启示[J].政治学研究,2012,(2):103.
[28] 王友云, 赵圣文.区域合作背景下政府间协议的一个分析框架:集体行动中的博弈[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2016,(3):70.
[29] 吕丽娜, 赵小燕.中国城市群府际合作治理困境与对策:基于元治理的视角[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(3):11.
[30] 陈广汉. 粤港高校合作的现状、问题与对策[A].梁庆寅,陈广汉.粤港澳区域合作与发展报告(2010-2011)[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011.149-150.
[31] 罗思东. 从小城镇到大都市:改革开放以来我国城市化政策的演进[J].马克思主义与现实,2014,(6):181.
[32] 邢华. 我国区域合作的纵向嵌入式治理机制研究:基于交易成本的视角[J].中国行政管理,2015,(10):81.
[33] 谢宝剑,高洁儒.粤港跨境区域协同创新系统研究[J].港澳研究,2017,(1):59.