|
|
|
| The Internal Logic and the Legislative Approach for Shenzhen to Build a Pilot Demonstration Area of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics |
| ZOU Ping-xue1, FENG Ze-hua2,3 |
1. Research Center of Basic Law of Hong Kong and Macao, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060;
2. College of Marxism, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060;
3. College of Marxism, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, 102488 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract To build a pilot demonstration area of socialism with Chinese characteristics, Shenzhen not only plays an important role as one of the four major cities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, but also undertakes the mission of integrating the construction of a pilot demonstration area and the Greater Bay Area into the national strategy of governing the country with law so as to spread its influence nationwide and even worldwide. Therefore, building Shenzhen into a pilot demonstration area of socialism with Chinese characteristics is a major strategy for China to achieve national rejuvenation. Legislation is an important part of the rule of law. The internal logic of China’s rule of law shows the national level of rule of law defines the local level. Shenzhen should resonate with the national rule of law, which is the logical starting point and legal goal of the pilot demonstration area of socialism with Chinese characteristics, and also the correct direction of the legislative approach for the rule of law in the pilot demonstration area. In terms of basic configuration, the legislative power of the Special Economic Zone is a booster for Shenzhen to build a pilot demonstration area. Shenzhen should maximize the legislative power of the Special Economic Zone. In term of top design, the legislative coordination mechanism based on authorization is the constitutional guarantee for Shenzhen to build a pilot demonstration area of socialism with Chinese characteristics. Shenzhen should make full use of the legislative coordination mechanism to work out top institutional problems. Only when basic configuration and top design are well addressed, and full play is given to the enthusiasm of the central and local governments can the institutional rationality of the rule of law in the pilot demonstration area be revealed.
|
|
Received: 06 January 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 叶海波,谢梦琪.恣意修法与法治肢解——深圳小汽车限购事件透视[J].公法研究,2017,(1):124-139.
[2] 武增. 中华人民共和国立法法解读[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2015.273.
[3] 陈伯礼. 授权立法的位阶探讨[J].现代法学,1999,(6):51-55.
[4] 吴鹏. 论经济特区法规的效力等级[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2009,(3):54-58.
[5] 马怀德. 中国立法体制、程序与监督[M].北京:中国法制出版社,1999.138.
[6] 崔文俊. 论经济特区法规的位阶[J].学术交流,2019,(6):71-79.
[7] 张文显. 法理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2018.122.
[8] 庞凌. 关于经济特区授权立法变通权规定的思考[J].学习与探索,2015,(1):74-78.
[9] 李舒瑜.特区授权立法25周年成果斐然[N].深圳特区报,2017-07-12(A01).
[10] 张一琪,韩维正.用法治为一流营商环境护航——《关于支持深圳建设中国特色社会主义先行示范区的意见》解读之二[N].人民日报(海外版),2019-08-28(02).
[11] 韩大元.发挥宪法在法律体系中统率全局作用[N].法制日报,2012-08-06(07).
[12] 林彦. 经济特区立法再审视[J].中国法律评论,2019,(5):179-186.
[13] 陈逸群.25年制定法规220项护航改革发展深圳64项法规填补国家立法空白[N].深圳晚报,2017-07-13(A03).
[14] 常纪文.把握好国家立法与党内法规制定的关系[J].学习时报,2014-03-03(005).
[15] 章志远. 挑战与回应:党政联合发文的法治化路径初探[J].党内法规理论研究,2019,(1):75-87.
[16] 胡蓉.以一流法治环境打造全球标杆城市[N].深圳商报,2019-08-21(A01). |
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 37 
