|
|
|
| “History” and “Thinking” in Intellectual History:A Debate between Pingti Ho and New Confucianism about the True Interpretation of Confucius“keji and fuli ” |
| HE Zhuo-en, LIU Heng |
| Institute of Chinese Modern History, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430079 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract There are lots of controversies on the issues of “history” and “thinking” in the study of intellectual history. Some academics pay attention to exegesis, emphasizing "truth" of history in order to restore true history. Others, however, focus on philosophical reflection and emphasize the systematic characteristics of concepts so as to be creative in philosophical interpretation. In 1990s, the debate between Ping-ti Ho and New Confucianism scholars on the true interpretation of Confucius’ “keji and fuli(克己复礼)” in Hong Kong’s 21st Century was a typical discussion in this field. Although the debate came to nought as they both hold onto their opinions and showed little agreement with each other, the new ideas put forward by some of the scholars who closely followed this debate help us make further reflection upon the issues of “history” and “thinking” in intellectual history.
|
|
Received: 20 September 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 李怀宇，陈来.何炳棣对杜维明的批评站不住脚[N].时代周报，2013-10-11.
[2] 杜维明.建构精神性人文主义——从克己复礼为仁的现代解读出发[J].探索与争鸣，2014，(2):4-10.
[3] 杜维明.人性与自我修养[M].胡军，于民雄译.北京：中国和平出版社,1988.
[4] （宋）朱熹.四书章句集注[M].北京：中华书局,1983.
[5] 胡文辉.现代学林点将录[M].广州:广东人民出版社,2010.299.
[6] 何炳棣.读史阅世六十年[M].北京：中华书局,2012.
[7] 何炳棣.儒家宗法模式的宇宙本体论——从张载的《西铭》谈起[J].哲学研究,1998，(12):69.
[8] 何炳棣.华夏人本主义文化：渊源、特征及意义（下）[J].二十一世纪,1996，（34）:96.
[9] 王先谦.荀子集解（第一册）[M].沈啸寰，王星贤点校.北京：中华书局,1988.12.
[10] 何炳棣.“克己复礼”真诠——当代新儒家杜维明治学方法的初步检讨[J].二十一世纪,1991，(8).
[11] 杨伯峻编著.春秋左传注[M].北京：中华书局,2009.1341.
[12] 编后语[J].二十一世纪,1991，(8)：165.
[13] 封祖盛.当代新儒家[M].北京：三联书店,1989.216.
[14] 杜维明.从既惊讶又荣幸到迷惑而费解——写在敬答何炳棣教授之前[J].二十一世纪,1991，(8).
[15] 刘述先.从方法论的角度论何炳棣教授对“克己复礼”的解释[J].二十一世纪,1992，(9).
[16] 何炳棣.原礼[J].二十一世纪,1992，(11):104-109.
[17] 刘述先.再谈“克己复礼真诠”——答何炳棣教授[J].二十一世纪,1992，(11):149.
[18] 孙国栋.“克己复礼为仁”争论平议[J].二十一世纪,1992，(12).
[19] 匡亚明.孔子评传[M].济南：齐鲁书社,1985.258-259.
[20] 何炳棣.答孙国栋教授《“克己复礼为仁”争论平议》[J].二十一世纪,1992，(13).
[21] 孙国栋.敬答何炳棣教授[J].二十一世纪,1993，(17):138-140.
[22] “三边互动”栏目[J].二十一世纪,1992，(10):159-160.
[23] 高瑞泉.上天入地：思想史的边界与方法[J].杭州师范学院学报（社会科学版）,2003，(4):1-6. |
|
|
|
2016, Vol. 33 
