APEC数智经济共同体：一体化转型及制度安排

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (9)

Download: PDF (597 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The study of the integration of the APEC digital-intelligent economic community is, in essence, a study of the institutional evolution and underlying logic of integration within a heterogeneous community. This is because the integration of the digital-intelligent economy is fundamentally premised upon, and sustained by, institutional integration. The term “digital-intelligent economic community” refers to a historically situated expression of regional economic integration in the context of the deep convergence between the digital economy and the intelligent economy. By contrast, the “integration of a digital-intelligent economic community” denotes the process and mechanisms through which such a community takes shape. Since its establishment, APEC’s institutional transformation toward a digital-intelligent economic community has evolved through five stages: emergence, foundation-building, deepening, convergence, and future-oriented development. This five-stage trajectory reveals a gradual evolutionary path and theoretical logic moving from institutional creation to institutional integration. The evolution of the APEC digital-intelligent economic community not only provides a referential model for the transformation of regional economic integration, but also offers broader theoretical implications. First, path dependence can generate paradigmatic transformation through institutional layering, rather than requiring institutional rupture. Second, the institutional effects of critical junctures are characterized by delayed activation rather than immediate determination. Third, the hardening of soft law follows an identifiable gradient path, in which informal and formal institutions evolve through hierarchical nesting and complementarity rather than binary opposition. Fourth, “inclusive efficiency” constitutes the efficiency optimum in the era of network effects, rather than a cost imposed on efficiency. Fifth, the optimal solution for cooperation among heterogeneous regions lies in modular institutions rather than in an all-or-nothing model of integration. Through the institutional resilience of the “Asia-Pacific Way”, APEC offers a middle path for global digital governance.

Key words： APEC digital-intelligent economic community institutional change path dependence inclusive efficiency modular institutions

Received: 03 June 2026

F114.46

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	TAO Yi-tao

Cite this article:

TAO Yi-tao. The APEC Digital-Intelligent Economic Community: Integrative Transformation and Institutional Arrangements[J]. , 2026, 43(4): 5-16.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2026/V43/I4/5

[1] 王宝顺. 数字利维坦的税收挑战与财政契约重构——基于社会契约理论的全球税收治理研究[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2026,37(2):113-125.
[2] 王娟,孙泽宇.中国式现代化对“数字巴别塔”问题的应对及世界意义[J].理论导刊,2026,(3):86-93.
[3] (美)道格拉斯·C·诺思.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].刘守英译.上海:上海三联书店,1994.
[4] 盛斌,袁波,王玉主. APEC开放的区域主义与建设亚太共同体[J].国际经济评论,2026,(2):9-26.
[5] 沈铭辉,张中祥,王健,等. APEC开放创新合作与促进共同繁荣[J].国际经济评论,2026,(2):27-54.
[6] Lipscy P Y.Explaining Institutional Change:Policy Areas, Outside Options, and The Bretton Woods Institutions[J].American Journal of Political Science,2015,59(2):341-356.
[7] 王厚双,宋春子.论美国东亚经济一体化战略的调整与日本的战略响应[J].日本研究,2015,(1):1-11.
[8] 宋伟. 亚太命运共同体的制度构建:理论分析、历史经验与现实路径[J].中共中央党校(国家行政学院)学报,2025,29(3):38-53.
[9] 李林,丁茂战.全球治理倡议与真正的多边主义:从理念共识到机制演进的路径[J].东北亚论坛,2026,35(3):20-32+127.
[10] 李墨丝. 欧美日跨境数据流动规则的博弈与合作[J].国际贸易,2021,(2):82-88.
[11] Peters B., Pierre J.The New Institutionalism in Political Science[J].The SAGE Handbook of Political Science,2020:133.
[12] Streeck W., Thelen K.Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies[M].Oxford:Ox-ford University Press,2005.21.
[13] Mahoney J., Thelen K.A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change[J].Explaining Institutional Change:Ambiguity,Ag-ency,and Power,2010,1(1):1-37.
[14] Feiock R.Rational Choice and Regional Governance[J]. Journal of Urban Affairs,2007,29(1):47-63.
[15] Douglass N.Institutional Change:A Framework of Analy-sis Social Rules[M].New York: Routledge,2018.189-201.
[16] (美)奥利弗·E·威廉姆森.交易成本经济学:一个自然演进[M].陈耿宣,陈桓亘,颜超凡等译.上海:格致出版社,2023.54-82.
[17] Aoki M.Endogenizing Institutions and Institutional Ch-anges[J].Journal of Institutional Economics,2007,3(1):1-31.
[18] 陈怀超,张晶,费玉婷.制度支持是否促进了产学研协同创新?——企业吸收能力的调节作用和产学研合作紧密度的中介作用[J].科研管理,2020,41(3):1-11.
[19] 丁晓钦,魏宇航.包容性制度:中国特色社会主义的制度优势[J].当代经济研究,2025,(8):71-81.
[20] 程梦瑶,任羽卓.“十五五”时期我国数字贸易高质量发展:趋势特征与战略路径[J].中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版),2026,28(2):155-168.
[21] 周雪光. 寻找中国国家治理的历史线索[J].中国社会科学,2019,(1):90-100.
[22] 王亚华,舒全峰.公共事物治理的集体行动研究评述与展望[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2021,31(4):118-131.
[23] Buchanan J.An Economic Theory of Clubs[J].Economi-ca,1965,32(125):1-14.
[24] Romer P.Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1986,94(5):1002-1037.
[25] Putnam R., Leonardi R., Nonetti R.Making Democracy Work:Civic Traditions in Modern Italy[M].Princeton Uni-versity Press,1994.38.
[26] (美)赫伯特·A·西蒙.管理行为[M].詹正茂译.北京:机械工业出版社,2013.33.
[27] Hayek F.The Use of Knowledge in Society[A].Modern Understandings of Liberty and Property[M].New York:Ro-utledge,2013.27-38.