APEC经济体文化产业治理国别比较：模式类型及生成逻辑

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (571 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Against the backdrop of the deep advancement of digital transformation in the global cultural industry, intensifying international cultural competition, and deepening regional cooperation in the Asia-Pacific, APEC economies exhibit significant national differences and diversified governance models in their cultural industries. Based on comparative analysis across countries and policy content review, this study examines representative APEC cultural industry policies, official statistics, and governance practices through three analytical dimensions: governance actors, governance instruments, and governance objectives. The findings reveal four distinct governance models: the national-strategic steering model which is dominated by national planning and institutional integration; the market-competition driven model which centers on copyright regimes and corporate innovation; the cultural-protection balancing model which focuses on preserving local culture and facilitating industrial transformation; and the open-cooperation embedded model which relies on regional networks and external market linkages. These four governance models represent adaptive governance arrangements shaped by the interplay of institutional structure, industrial development stage, cultural traditions, and position within globalization across different economies. Each model demonstrates comparative advantages such as strategic coordination, market innovation, cultural protection, and external integration, while also facing governance limitations including administrative dependency, platform monopolies, insufficient transformation, and external reliance. To optimize its cultural industry governance, China should leverage its institutional strengths, rich cultural resources, and vast market scale to build a more integrated, open, and resilient hybrid governance system that better coordinates strategic leadership, market incentives, copyright protection, platform regulation, cultural subjectivity preservation, and regional collaboration within the APEC framework.

Key words： APEC economies cultural industry governance model typology formation logic cross-national comparison

Received: 19 May 2026

G13

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	GUO Ji-tao
	ZHANG Bian-xiu

Cite this article:

GUO Ji-tao,ZHANG Bian-xiu. Comparative Analysis of Cultural Industry Governance across APEC Economies: Model Typologies and Formation Logic[J]. , 2026, 43(4): 17-28.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2026/V43/I4/17

[1] 孙英春. 逆全球化趋向下的文化安全与文化治理[J].浙江学刊,2021,(5):32-40.
[2] 蔡劲松. 数智时代统筹文化发展和安全:多维特征、风险挑战与治理趋向[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2025,(5):20-30.
[3] APEC Policy Support Unit. Reframing an Unfolding Canvas: Policy Approaches to Facilitate APEC’s Creative Economy amid Evolving Digital Technologies[R].Singapore:APEC Secretariat,2024.
[4] 王金会. 文化政策驱动下的中国文化产业关键性问题[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,41(1):44-54.
[5] 蔡武进,张津期.我国数字文化产业治理的政策牵引历程及趋向[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2025,39(6):114-122.
[6] 解学芳. 数智时代数字文化产业高质量发展范式——基于“技术-文化-制度”模型[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2025,64(5):166-176.
[7] Duffy B E, Poell T, Nieborg D B.Platform Practices in the Cultural Industries: Creativity, Labor, and Citizenship[J].Social Media + Society,2019,5(4).DOI:10.1177/2056305119879672.
[8] 祁述裕,闫烁.数字时代文化产业治理新特点与繁荣文化产业新思路[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,(1):21-29.
[9] 吴承忠,牛舒晨.数字文化产业生态系统的结构特征、治理逻辑及路径[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024, 41(3):46-57.
[10] Kong L, Gibson C, Khoo L M, et al.Knowledges of the Creative Economy: Towards a Relational Geography of Diffusion and Adaptation in Asia[J].Asia Pacific Viewpo-int,2006,47(2):173-194.
[11] 范玉刚,刘娱忻.中韩文化产业发展模式比较[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2025,42(6):44-55.
[12] 周建新,朱学平.中国文化产业研究2024年度学术报告[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2025,42(1):46-58.
[13] APEC. Sharing Best Policy Practices to Develop and Promote MSMEs Access to Digital Cultural and Creative Industries[R].Singapore:APEC Secretariat,2025.
[14] (美)埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆.公共事物的治理之道:集体行动制度的演进[M].余逊达,陈旭东译.上海:上海译文出版社,2012.13-19.
[15] Thornton P H, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M.The Institutional Logics Perspective:A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2012.42-148.
[16] Friedland R, Alford R R.Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions[A]. Powell W W, DiMaggio P J(eds).The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis[M].Chicago:University of Chi-cago Press,1991.232-263.
[17] 邵明华,高洋.数字技术何以赋能中国式现代化文化形态:基于文化产业视角[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,41(4):56-64.
[18] 李凤亮,周建新,花建,等.加快发展文化新质生产力:理论内涵与实践路径[J].探索与争鸣,2024,(7):4+177.
[19] Hesmondhalgh D, Pratt A C.Cultural Industries and Cultural Policy[J].International Journal of Cultural Policy,2005,11(1):1-13.
[20] The Association of Japanese Animations. Anime Industry Report 2025[R].Tokyo:The Association of Japanese Ani-mations,2025.
[21] Ryoo W, Jin D Y.Cultural Politics in the South Korean Cultural Industries:Confrontations between State-deve-lopmentalism and Neoliberalism[J].International Journal of Cultural Policy,2020,26(1):31-45.
[22] 李康化,姜姗.文化新质生产力的生成逻辑及治理方略[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2024,(10):46-57.
[23] 张振鹏. 中国文化产业新质生产力的核心要素及其结构形态[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,41(4):47-55.
[24] UNESCO. UNESCO Global Report on Cultural Policies,Culture:The Missing SDG[R].Paris:UNESCO,2025.
[25] 向勇.新质生产力与数字文化产业高质量发展的价值建构[J].江苏社会科学,2024,(5):68-76+242.
[26] Vlassis A.Cooperation among Intergovernmental Orga-nizations in Global Cultural Governance: Towards an Actor-centered Constructivist Approach[J].International Journal of Cultural Policy,2022,28(6):755-770.
[27] 魏鹏举. 数字时代的文化贸易:演变、机遇与挑战[J].江西社会科学,2024,44(1):187-195.
[28] 陈泥,肖波.迈向全球文化治理——联合国教科文组织文化政策的演进分析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,(3):51-60.
[29] UNCTAD. Creative Economy Outlook 2024[R].Geneva:UNCTAD,2024.