论文化类专业的学科问题

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (591 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract As an institutionalized design for academic development and professional education, disciplines serve both as the foundation defining the nature, scope, and legitimacy of academic activities and as the standards governing researchers’ professional conduct. It is precisely through disciplines that academic research and teaching activities can form a “scholarly tradition” or “academic community” in practice. Whether in university teaching or general academic research, all are organized around disciplinary frameworks. As early as the 1990s, discussions on the disciplinary construction of “culture” emerged in cultural academia. Since the 21st century, the rapid development of the cultural industry has further fueled the expectation of establishing a “cultural industry studies” discipline. Although discussions on “cultural science” in the late 19th century, the romanticist “cultural critique” and British “cultural studies” did not unfold within disciplinary frameworks, today’s cultural (industry) studies in China have become a prominent field, raising both theoretical and practical questions about disciplinary construction. Based on the development of China’s cultural studies and existing professional development experiences, the disciplinary setup for culture-related majors is best achieved by adding “cultural management” as a primary discipline under the management category.

Key words： cultural science cultural criticism cultural studies cultural management first-level discipline

Received: 25 December 2025

:	G124
	G64

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	SHAN Shi-lian

Cite this article:

SHAN Shi-lian. On the Disciplinary Issues of Culture-Related Majors[J]. , 2026, 43(3): 52-63.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2026/V43/I3/52

[1] 郑洁. 世界文化管理与教育(上卷)[M].香港:中华书局(香港)有限公司,2019.68-85.
[2] (德)安斯加·纽宁,维拉·纽宁.文化学研究导论:理论基础·方法思路·研究视角[M].闵志荣译.南京:南京大学出版社,2018.
[3] (英)约翰·穆勒.道德科学的逻辑[M].李涤非译.北京:商务印书馆,2024.17.
[4] (英)以赛亚·伯林.扭曲的人性之材[M].岳秀坤译.南京:译林出版社,2009.61.
[5] (德)文德尔班.历史与自然科学[A].洪谦.现代西方哲学论著选辑[C].北京:商务印书馆,1993.76.
[6] (英)柯林伍德.历史的观念(增补版)[M].杜森编.何兆武,张文杰,陈新译.北京:北京大学出版社,2010.165.
[7] 林泽远. 从赫德到米德——迈向沟通共同体的德国古典语言哲学思路[M].台北:联经出版事业股份有限公司,2019.382.
[8] (德)伽达默尔,杜特.解释学美学实践哲学——伽达默尔与杜特对谈录(2000)[M].潘德荣译.北京:商务印书馆,2005.9-10.
[9] (法)卢梭.论语言的起源[M].李平沤译.北京:商务印书馆,2021.31.
[10] (法)卢梭.卢梭全集:第二卷[M].李平沤译.北京:商务印书馆,2012.141.
[11] (法)卢梭.卢梭全集:第四卷[M].李平沤译.北京:商务印书馆,2012.231-232.
[12] (德)康德.历史理性批判文集[M].何兆武译.北京:商务印书馆,1991.15.
[13] (英)以赛亚·伯林.浪漫主义的根源[M].哈代编.吕梁,张箭飞译.南京:译林出版社,2019.12.
[14] (德)诺瓦利斯.夜颂[A].刘小枫.夜颂中的革命和宗教——诺瓦利斯选集(卷一)[C].林克等译.北京:华夏出版社,2008.38.
[15] (美)弗雷德里克·拜泽尔.浪漫的律令——德国早期浪漫主义观念[M].黄江译.北京:华夏出版社,2019.35.
[16] 单世联. 文化大转型:批判与解释——西方文化产业理论研究(下卷)[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2017.
[17] (英)弗朗西斯·穆尔赫恩.文化研究与政治[A].埃伦·梅克辛斯·伍德等.保卫历史——马克思主义与后现代主义[C].郝名玮译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009.
[18] (英)雷蒙·威廉斯.漫长的革命[M].倪伟译.上海:上海教育出版社,2012.3.
[19] (英)斯图尔特·霍尔.文化研究1983——一部理论史[M].周敏,程孟利译.北京:商务印书馆,2021.23.
[20] (美)劳伦斯·格罗斯伯格.文化研究的流通[A].罗钢等.文化研究读本[C].马海良译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000.53-54.
[21] O’Connor J.Culture Is Not an Industry: Reclaiming Art and Culture for the Common Good[M].Manchester:Man-chester University Press,2024.
[22] (美)詹姆斯·海尔布伦,查尔斯·M·格雷.艺术文化经济学(第2版)[M].詹正茂等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.3-4.
[23] 习近平. 在文艺工作座谈会上的讲话[A].习近平.论党的宣传思想工作[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2020.116.