技术封建主义的增殖逻辑及其批判

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (558 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Technological feudalism, as a new form of contemporary capitalism with strong monopolistic characteristics, seeks to establish a new mode of exploitation that transcends national boundaries and geographical limits through technological monopolies, platform exploitation, and ideological control. Technological feudalism establishes a distinct logic for the proliferation of digital capital by shifting the contents of exploitation from “physical goods” to “virtual data”, disguising the forms of exploitation from “labor exploitation” into “digital exploitation”, expanding the scope of exploitation from “factory spaces” to “the entire society”, and intensifying the degree of exploitation from “physical control” to “ideological control”. In doing so, it carries out predatory labor exploitation on a global scale. The proliferation logic of technological feudalism does not alter the exploitative essence of capitalism. Rather, it contains inherent irreconcilable contradictions, such as increasing the degree of exploitation of individuals, exacerbating social inequality, and causing political polarization within nations. In response to the negative consequences stemming from the proliferation logic of technological feudalism, a comprehensive three-dimensional solution integrating “institutions, technology, and culture” must be constructed in practice, focusing on three key elements: data, platforms, and values. The core of this approach lies in constructing new digital institutions that transcend data monopolies, developing shared technologies that overcome platform lock-ins, and promoting common human values that rise above ideological control. Through these pathways, the proliferation logic of technological feudalism can be dismantled, paving the way for a new era of digital civilization that aligns with the shared needs of all humanity.

Key words： technological feudalism proliferation logic data monopoly labor exploitation ideological control

Received: 24 December 2025

PACS:	F49
	D033.3

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Hai-jian

Cite this article:

WANG Hai-jian. The Proliferation Logic of Technological Feudalism and Its Critique[J]. , 2026, 43(2): 25-34.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2026/V43/I2/25

[1] 列宁选集(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2012.704.
[2] (法)塞德里克·迪朗.技术封建主义[M].陈荣钢译.北京:中国人民出版社,2024.
[3] Varoufakis Y.Technofeudalism:What Killed Capitalism[M]. London:Bodley Head,2023.71.
[4] 马克思恩格斯全集(第21卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2003. 423.
[5] Manyika J,Chui M, Brown B, et al.Big Data:The Next Fro-ntier for Innovation, and Productivity[M].Washington:McK-insey Global Institute,2011.13.
[6] 本刊记者,赵丁琪.倦怠社会、技术封建主义与西方资本主义的危机——访著名哲学家斯拉沃热·齐泽克[J].世界社会主义研究,2024,(6):68-79.
[7] (德)哈特穆特·罗萨.新异化的诞生:社会加速批判理论大纲[M].郑作彧译.上海:上海人民出版社,2018.13.
[8] 马克思恩格斯全集(第44卷)[M]克思恩格斯全集(第44卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2001. 606.
[9] 马克思恩格斯选集(第2卷)[M]克思恩格斯选集(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2012. 172-173.
[10] Comor E.Digital Presumption and Alienation[J].Epheme-ra,2010,10(3):439-454.
[11] 解丽霞,赵哲.数字资本空间中的数字劳动异化与扬弃[J].学术研究,2025,(3):23-29+45+177.
[12] (美)迈克尔·哈特,(意)安东尼奥·奈格里.狄俄尼索斯的劳动:对国家-形式的批判[M].王行坤译.西安:西北大学出版社,2022.19.
[13] 马克思恩格斯文集(第7卷)[M]克思恩格斯文集(第7卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009. 875.
[14] 涂良川,潘依林.技术封建主义:科技进步的政治退步 ——当代西方左翼“技术封建理性批判”刍议[J].世界社会科学,2023,(2):210-225+247-248.
[15] 马克思恩格斯全集(第37卷)[M]克思恩格斯全集(第37卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2019. 161.
[16] Fuchs C.Digital Labour and Karl Marx[M].New York: The Routledge Press,2014.107.
[17] (法)米歇尔·福柯.规训与惩罚:监狱的诞生[M].刘北成,杨远婴译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1999.198.
[18] 王海建. 数字帝国主义的文化殖民逻辑及其批判[J].马克思主义研究,2025,(3):128-137.
[19] (德)马克斯·霍克海默,西奥多·阿多诺.启蒙辩证法——哲学断片[M].渠敬东,曹卫东译.上海:上海人民出版社,2020.10.
[20] Lazzarato M.Signs and Machines:Capitalism and the Pro-duction of Subjectivity[M].Los Angeles:Semiotext(e), 2014. 25.
[21] (日)福田雅树,林秀弥,成原慧.AI联结的社会——人工智能网络化时代的伦理与法律[M].宋爱译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2020.151.
[22] (美)约瑟夫·斯蒂格利茨.美国真相:民众、政府和市场势力的失衡与再平衡[M].刘斌,等译.北京:机械工业出版社,2020.XXXVI.
[23] 林子涵.美国离“村网通”还有多远?[N].人民日报(海外版),2023-10-10(10).
[24] 余南平.通用人工智能时代的国际权力重塑[J].中国社会科学,2025,(4):41-59+205.
[25] (美)赫伯特·马尔库塞.单向度的人——发达工业社会意识形态研究[M].刘继译.上海:上海译文出版社,2008.2.
[26] 申青青,罗建波.算法部落化:人工智能对美国文化战争的嵌入[J].美国研究,2025,39(5):48-65+6.
[27] (德)尤尔根·哈贝马斯.作为“意识形态”的技术与科学[M].李黎,郭官义译.上海:学林出版社,1999.54.
[28] 马克思恩格斯选集(第3卷)[M]克思恩格斯选集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2012. 178.
[29] 马克思恩格斯全集(第38卷)[M]克思恩格斯全集(第38卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2019. 130.
[30] 王海建,郝宇青.习近平关于资本重要论述探析[J].思想理论战线,2022,(6):18-25+140.
[31] (美)迈克尔·奎特,顾海燕.数字殖民主义:美帝国与全球南方的新帝国主义[J].国外理论动态,2022,(3):112-122.
[32] 中共中央关于进一步全面深化改革推进中国式现代化的决定[M]共中央关于进一步全面深化改革推进中国式现代化的决定[M].北京:人民出版社,2024.13.
[33] (美)迈克尔·哈特,(意)安东尼奥·奈格里.帝国——全球化的政治秩序[M].杨建国,范一亭译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2008.316.
[34] (德)罗莎·卢森堡.资本积累论[M].于树生译.北京:商务印书馆,2021.356.