|
|
|
| Chinese-Style Modernization and “Gradual Reform” with Chinese Characteristics |
| TAO Yi-tao |
| China Center for Special Economic Zone Research, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As a successful transition, Chinese-style modernization has demonstrated a unique path and enriched the theoretical connotation of transition economics. Progressive reform with Chinese characteristics is the path of institutional change for realizing modernization that suits China’s national conditions. It influences the process of institutional change and Chinese-style modernization in Chinese society through four logics: From the perspective of the evolution mode of institutional change, the mandatory institutional change designed by the central government at the top level and the induced institutional change triggered by special policies, as the two aspects of institutional supply and demand in the reform process, are complementary in institutional performance. From the perspective of the specific implementation path of institutional change, the combination of top-down mandatory institutional change, which is dominant, and bottom-up induced institutional change, which is the result and driving force of mandatory institutional change, constitutes the internal evolution logic of the institutional performance of the progressive reform with Chinese characteristics; from the perspective of the main body of institutional change, the “dual system” and the “dual policy” are the two aspects of the reform process, and the “dual system” is the two aspects of institutional supply and demand. From the perspective of the main body of institutional change, the “double main body structure” is not only an important factor for the progressive reform with Chinese characteristics to unleash potential institutional performance but also an indispensable institutional force for the continuous advancement of Chinese modernization; from the perspective of the driving mechanism of institutional change, Hong Kong and Macao, as “exogenous variables” with great potential, exert significant influence through the learning effect, impacting the development of Chinese modernization. From the perspective of the driving mechanism of institutional change, Hong Kong and Macao, as “exogenous variables” with great potential, facilitate the gradual formation of “adaptive expectations” in the Special Economic Zones (SEZs) through the combined effects of the learning and imitation effects, continuously strengthening the endogenous driving force of progressive reform with Chinese characteristics and thus accelerating the pace of Chinese-style modernization.
|
|
Received: 10 February 2025
|
|
|
| About author:: 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中国特色渐进式改革与中国道路——经济特区与粤港澳大湾区的制度创新与实践研究”（23JJD790011）; 国家社科基金重大专项“经济体制改革牵引作用与协同推进其他各领域改革研究”（24ZDA006） |
|
|
|
[1] 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗[N].人民日报,2022-10-17(002).
[2] 马克思恩格斯选集(第2卷)[M]马克思恩格斯选集(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995. 45.
[3] 张宇,张晨,蔡万焕.中国经济模式的政治经济学分析[J].中国社会科学,2011,(3):69-84+221.
[4] 王曙光. 转型经济学的框架变迁与中国范式的全球价值 ——纪念中国改革开放30周年[J].财经研究,2009,35(5):17-29.
[5] (美)约瑟夫·斯蒂格利茨.社会主义向何处去——经济体制转型的理论与证据[M].周立群等译.长春:吉林人民出版社,2010.
[6] 陈世清. 经济领域的“哥白尼革命” [M].北京:中国时代经济出版社,2005.1.
[7] (比)热若尔·罗兰.转型与经济学[M].张帆译.北京:北京大学出版社,2002.
[8] 毛增余. 斯蒂格利茨与转轨经济学[M].北京:中国时代经济出版社,2005.
[9] (波兰)格泽戈尔兹·科勒得克.从休克到治疗——后社会主义转轨的政治经济[M].刘小勇等译.上海:上海远东出版社,2000.22.
[10] 林治华. 转轨经济研究举要[J].经济研究参考,2007,(7):29-33.
[11] 吕炜. 转轨经济研究思路的评述、反思与创新[J].财经问题研究,2004,(2):3-10.
[12] 萨克斯,胡永泰,杨小凯.经济改革和宪政转轨[J].经济学(季刊),2003,(3):961-988.
[13] 刘异伟. 经济转轨的成本分析[J].贵州财经学院学报,2002,(2):49-52.
[14] 陶一桃. 经济特区与中国特色“渐进式改革”的绩效[J].广东社会科学,2020,(6):19-29.
[15] 卢现祥.西方新制度经济学的流派渊源关系及其发展趋势[J].经济评论,2004,(5):50-53+62.
[16] D. North, R. Thomas, The Rise of the Western World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973, pp.210-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60324-2_2
[17] (美)詹姆斯·布坎南.民主过程中的财政:财政制度与个人选择[M].穆怀朋译.上海:三联书店上海分店,1992.25.
[18] 卢现祥,李晓敏.论制度与企业家活动[J].经济学家,2011,(05):42-49.
[19] M. Moore, F. Westley, Surmountable Chasms: Networks and Social Innovation for Resilient Systems[J]. Ecology and Society, 2011, 16(1). doi:10.1029/GM044p0001
[20] (美)道格拉斯·诺思.理解经济变迁过程[M].钟正生等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.98.
[21] 杨震宁,赵红.中国企业的开放式创新:制度环境､“竞合”关系与创新绩效[J].管理世界,2020,36(2):139-160+224.
[22] (匈)亚诺什·科尔内.短缺经济学(上)[M].张晓光等译.北京:经济科学出版社,1986.40.
[23] 王怀勇,冯鑫煜.统一大市场背景下制度性市场分割的理论阐释与治理优化[J].现代经济探讨,2024,(2):1-13.
[24] (美)道格纳斯·诺思.财产权利与制度变迁——产权学派与新制度学派译文集[M].刘守英等译.上海:上海人民出版社,1994.272.
[25] (美)道格纳斯·诺思.制度､制度变迁与经济绩效[M].杭行译.上海:格致出版社,2014.
[26] (美)道格纳斯·诺思.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].陈郁,罗华平译.上海:上海人民出版社,1994.1-2.
[27] 何炜. 理念何以影响政策变迁?——基于民办高等教育营利性与非营利性政策的考察[J].教育科学探索,2022,40(4):38-47.
[28] 马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2012.669.
[29] 新时代经济特区新使命新作为[N].深圳特区报,2018-05-08(003). |
|
|
|
2025, Vol. 42 
