|
|
The Logic and Path for the Two-Way Co-Promotion of Digital Economy and Chinese-Style Modern Urban Civilization |
LI Feng1, ZHU Xi-nuo2 |
1. Business School of Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 211100; 2. Institute of Technological Innovation and Economic Development of Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 211100 |
|
|
Abstract The construction process of Chinese-style modern urban civilization is a social development process that grasps the opportunities of the development of the digital economy, takes digital technology as the main driving force, and takes the coordinated development of urban and rural areas, the improvement of urban functions, the deepening of the construction of spiritual civilization, and the harmonious coexistence of man and nature as the main purpose. From the perspective of the characteristic advantages of the digital economy, the essential characteristics of Chinese-style modern urban civilization, and its generation and development practice, the two have the basic logic of two-way co-promotion in terms of data-driven, environmental synergy and industrial transformation. The digital economy can promote the progress of urban civilization awareness through the construction of public living space, develop the integrated development system of “data, digital and carbon” to improve the urban ecological environment, build smart cities to improve urban governance capabilities, promote the digital level of cultural industries to enrich the cultural connotation of cities. In addition, rebuilding the image of urban civilization can provide a good social environment for the development of the digital economy; The construction of digital infrastructure with local characteristics can continuously optimize the market allocation of data elements; Extending the industrial chain of integrated development can promote the integrated development of the digital economy and the real economy; Urban civilization helps to guide the rise of the digital industry through a solid talent pool.
|
Received: 19 March 2024
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Tapscott D.The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1996.18-21. [2] Kuchi T.The Internet Encyclopedia[J].Online Information Review,2004,28(5):378-379. [3] Bukht, R,Heeks,R. Defining,Conceptualising and Meas-uring the Digital Economy[J].International Organisations R-esearch Journal,2017,13(2):143-172. [4] 陈晓红,李杨扬,宋丽洁,等.数字经济理论体系与研究展望[J].管理世界,2022,38(2). [5] 中国信息通信研究院.中国数字经济发展报告(2022年)[EB/OL].http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/202207/P020220729609949023295.pdf,2024-01-20. [6] 荆文君,孙宝文.数字经济促进经济高质量发展:一个理论分析框架[J].经济学家,2019,(2):66-73. [7] 杨汝岱,李艳,孟珊珊.企业数字化发展、全要素生产率与产业链溢出效应[J].经济研究,2023,58(11):44-61. [8] 周建新,谢金苗.中国文化产业研究2023年度学术报告[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,41(1):55-70. [9] 鲍宗豪.文明城市:一种中国特色的可持续城市化新模式[J].马克思主义研究,2011,(3):5-16+159. [10] 杨世义,尹聪平.新时代背景下乡风文明建设的现状及发展路径研究[J].农业经济问题,2021,(10):145. [11] 季中扬. 中国式现代化视域下城乡精神文明建设融合发展的方向与核心内容[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2024,24(3):40-50. [12] 金家厚,鲍宗豪.论城市文明的秩序意蕴[J].天津社会科学,2011,(2):4-9. [13] 陈忠. 城市社会的生命自觉与风险治理——一种城市哲学与文明批评史的视角[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,71(2):48-56. [14] 牛耕,何雨可,赵国昌.城市品牌与流动人口居留意愿:来自“文明城市”评选的证据[J].人口研究,2022,46(6):117-130. [15] 习近平. 在文化传承发展座谈会上的讲话[J].求是,2023,(17):4-11. [16] 刘建军.论中国特色社会主义创造了人类文明新形态[J].中国社会科学,2023,(3):60-74+205-206. [17] 孟献丽. 中华民族现代文明的出场逻辑与世界意义[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,41(1):33-43. [18] 陈金龙.中华民族现代文明的生成、特质与价值[J].中国社会科学,2023,(8):16-21+204. [19] 方正. 中华民族现代文明的国家形态之维[J].马克思主义研究,2024,(2):38-46. [20] 曹劲松,郑琼洁.中国式现代化城市实践的内涵与路径[J].现代经济探讨,2023,(12):83-90. [21] 周锦. 数字经济视域下文化产业数字生态体系的构建与创新[J].江苏社会科学,2023,(5):106-114. [22] 中共中央国务院关于加强基层治理体系和治理能力现代化建设的意见[EB/OL].https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2021/content_5627681.htm,2024-05-01. [23] 习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[J].求是,2022,(21):4-35. [24] 国家互联网信息办公室.数字中国发展报告(2022年)[EB/OL].https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/2023-04/28/content_5753561.htm,2024-02-15. [25] 习近平. 不断做强做优做大我国数字经济[J].求是,2022(2):4-8. [26] 阮芳,蔡菁容,张奕蕙等(波士顿咨询公司).迈向2035:4亿数字经济就业的未来[J].科技中国,2017,(4):20-26. [27] 李凤亮,陈能军.中国式文化现代化建设论纲[J].广东社会科学,2023,(3):5-14+289. |
|
|
|