下乡资本赋能中国农业经济高质量发展的机理与路径

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (586 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Capital infusion and market integration in rural areas play a pivotal role in promoting urban-rural integration and in constructing a new rural modernization pattern with the government as the main body, villages as the main characters, and enterprises and social capital as driving forces. The investment of capital in rural areas addresses the shortage of funds for rural infrastructure construction, stimulates the integration effect of “three rural” (agriculture, rural areas, and farmers) production factors, activates the rural market and the consumption potential of farmers, and promotes the modern transformation of rural governance order. This capital becomes embedded in the rural economic and social order, forming a deep integration and community of interests between the administrative power of grassroots party organizations, local resources, and rural capital enterprises. However, there are also issues such as deviation of capital momentum from core value goals, land abandonment, harm to farmers’ interests, and capital “flight”. In this way, it is essential to improve and regulate the institutional mechanisms and regulatory systems for the healthy development of rural capital, enhance the entrepreneurial spirit of capital investors as personalized subjects, and strengthen their ability to manage agricultural enterprises’ risk resistance and adaptability to the local human environment, to create favorable business conditions and localized cultural environments for the healthy development of rural capital. Furthermore, it is crucial to leverage the iterative effects of new quality productive forces in agriculture to drive high-quality development of the agricultural economy, enhance its endogenous motivation and effectively promote agricultural and rural modernization by the dual development trends of urbanization and reverse urbanization, and the requirements for sharing urban and rural resources.

Key words： rural capital agricultural economy high-quality development new quality productive forces practical orientation

Received: 29 March 2024

PACS:

F323.9

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LUO Jian-wen
	WU Xiao-jun

Cite this article:

LUO Jian-wen,WU Xiao-jun. The Mechanisms and Pathways of Rural Capital Empowering High-Quality Development of China’s Agricultural Economy[J]. , 2024, 41(4): 106-115.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2024/V41/I4/106

[1] 习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[M].北京:人民出版社,2022. 31.
[2] 中共中央国务院关于学习运用“千村示范、万村整治”工程经验有力有效推进乡村全面振兴的意见[N].人民日报,2024-02-04(001).
[3] 徐章星,王善高,金宇.工商资本下乡:问题缘起、基本逻辑与治理机制[J].农业经济,2021,(1):103-105.
[4] 马克思.资本论(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.
[5] 于天宇.资本逻辑与灾难资本主义[N].光明日报,2023-06-02(004).
[6] 本报记者.大量涉农项目资本跑路土地撂荒农民利益受损粮食战略安全受威胁 “下乡资本”跑马圈地“烂尾”频出[N].经济参考报,2018-01-30(004).
[7] 杨希双,罗建文.基于乡村振兴内生发展动力的农民主体性问题研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2023,(3):261-273.
[8] 列宁全集(第7卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2013.112.
[9] 列宁选集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2012.546.
[10] 习近平谈治国理政(第4卷)[M]习近平谈治国理政(第4卷)[M].北京:外文出版社,2022. 142.
[11] 马克思恩格斯全集(第30卷)[M]马克思恩格斯全集(第30卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995. 49.
[12] 高晓燕,任坤.工商资本下乡对农民收入的影响[J].江汉论坛,2020,(7):31-38.
[13] 冯娟. 基于资本下乡的乡村振兴战略发展研究[J].农业经济,2021,(2):114-115.
[14] 李宏,陈杰英.共同富裕下资本下乡与农村金融互动新发展——基于广东省实践的思考[J].经济论坛,2022,(4):47-53.
[15] 卢青青. 资本下乡与乡村治理重构[J].华南农业大学(社科版),2019,(5):126-129.
[16] 张良. “资本下乡”背景下的乡村治理公共性建构[J].中国农村观察,2016,(3):16-26.
[17] 仝志辉,温铁军.资本和部门下乡与小农户经济的组织化道路——兼对专业合作社道路提出质疑[J].开放时代,2009,(4):5-12.
[18] 韩锡广. 乡村振兴背景下工商资本下乡面临的问题及其对策[J].全国流通经济,2021,(9):74-79.
[19] 曹宗平,黄海阳.工商资本参与乡村振兴的动因、利弊及治理对策研究[J].学术论坛,2022,(1):124-132.
[20] 罗建文. 新质生产力是马克思主义生产力理论的新发展[J].学术交流,2024,(4):5-20.
[21] 马晓河,杨祥雪.以加快形成新质生产力推动农业高质量发展[J].农业经济问题,2024,(4):4-12.
[22] 杨颖. 发展农业新质生产力的价值意蕴与基本思路[J].农业经济问题,2024,(4):27-34.
[23] 中华人民共和国乡村振兴促进法[M]中华人民共和国乡村振兴促进法[M].北京:人民出版社,2021.4.