|
|
|
| Seeking Common Ground While Preserving Differences: The Commonality and Particularity of Economic Law Liability and Other Branches of Legal Liability |
| DING Ting-wei |
| Law School, Peking University, Beijing, 100091 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Refining the theory of economic law liability marks a significant step toward the maturation of economic law as a discipline. However, academic research on this subject remains incomplete. Currently, two primary perspectives dominate the discourse on the existence of economic law liability: the “negation theory” and the “affirmation theory”. Both viewpoints overemphasize the distinction between economic law liability and other branches of legal liability while neglecting their interconnections. The lack of a dialectical perspective makes the theory of independence of economic law responsibility relatively limited. To achieve a rational understanding of economic law liability, its particularity should be explored based on recognizing its commonality with other legal liabilities. Through the approach of “seeking common ground while preserving differences”, its independence should be clarified while adhering to the research framework of “essential commonality—methodological innovation—categorical differentiation—independent liability”. Specifically, the first step is to explore the commonality of legal liability and clarify that the essence of all legal liabilities lies in the “detriment” that legal subjects must bear as a consequence of sanctions. Secondly, research methods should be innovated by discarding the traditional “liability-independence” analytical paradigm and reconstructing a new framework of “independence—subject—conduct—liability” to explore the particularity of the elements and classification of economic law liability. Finally, based on this new analytical paradigm and classification system, ambiguities between economic law liability and other branches of legal liability should be resolved, thereby establishing the independence of economic law liability and ensuring the self-sufficiency and self-consistency of the responsibility theory of economic law.
|
|
Received: 10 January 2025
|
|
|
| About author:: 国家重点研发计划项目“跨领域知识驱动的法治调研智能感知及辅助决策技术研究”（2022YFC3301900） |
|
|
|
[1] 叶姗.经济责任:范畴提炼及其构造[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,59(1):118-127.
[2] 焦海涛. 经济法责任制度再释:一个常识主义立场[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2016,(3):45-58.
[3] 潘宁. 论经济法中的行为责任[J].经济法论丛,2022,40(2):26-40.
[4] 张守文. 经济法新型责任形态的理论拓掘[J].法商研究,2022,39(3):3-15.
[5] 张守文. 数字经济地方立法的统一与差异[J].地方立法研究,2024,9(6):94-109.
[6] (奥)凯尔森.法与国家的一般理论[M].沈宗灵译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1996.18.
[7] 黄海华. 行政处罚的重新定义与分类配置[J].华东政法大学学报,2020,23(4):31-43.
[8] 宋亚辉.风险控制的部门法思路及其超越[J].中国社会科学,2017,(10):136-158+207.
[9] 应飞虎. 知假买假行为适用惩罚性赔偿的思考——基于法经济学和法社会学的视角[J].中国法学,2004,(6):116-124.
[10] 张继恒. 从“规范教义”到“法理守则”:经济法学研究之转型[J].法商研究,2015,32(5):63-72.
[11] (德)马克斯·韦伯.学术与政治[M].冯克利译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998.23.
[12] 程信和. 经济法通则原论[J].地方立法研究,2019,4(1):54-129.
[13] 何锦前. 让流浪的权利回家——经济法学“权利缺失”现象反思[J].现代法学,2015,37(2):32-42.
[14] 王斐民,姚海放,曹燕等.中国法学会经济法学研究会2003年年会综述[J].中国法学,2004,(1):185-187.
[15] 2021年第22届全国经济法前沿理论研讨会暨第28期“经济法30人论坛”及其青年圆桌论坛成功举办[EB/OL].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/V4jF99r-IP0Hr-UVvQ5Oww,2025-02-24.
[16] 张世明. 经济法学理论演变原论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2019.27-30.
[17] (法)米歇尔·福柯.知识考古学[M].谢强,马月译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2003.198.
[18] 翟继光. 论经济法责任的独立性[J].当代法学,2004,(4):50-56.
[19] 张守文. 经济法责任理论之拓补[J].中国法学,2003,(4):11-22.
[20] 张继恒. 经济法责任理论及其思维转向[J].江西财经大学学报,2011,(6):115-122.
[21] 庄晓泳. 完善经济立法构建高水平社会主义市场经济体制——新中国经济立法主要成就和思考[J].法律适用,2025,(2):3-22.
[22] 应飞虎. 问题及其主义——经济法学研究非传统性之探析[J].法律科学(西北政法学院学报),2007,(2):86-94.
[23] 金福海. 经济法责任理论新解——“创新性”取代“独立性”的思考[J].经济法研究,2018,20(1):12-23.
[24] 蒋悟真. 经济法的学理化:理论省思与实践进路[J].政治与法律,2024,(11):113-127.
[25] 郭昌盛. 逃税罪的解构与重构——基于税收制度的整体考量和技术性规范[J].政治与法律,2018,(8):53-71.
[26] 张文显.法理学(第4版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,北京大学出版社,2011.124-125.
[27] 刘水林. 经济法责任体系的二元结构及二重性[J].政法论坛,2005,(2):96-103.
[28] 漆多俊. 经济法基础理论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2008.
[29] 邓峰. 论经济法上的责任——公共责任与财务责任的融合[J].中国人民大学学报,2003,(3):146-153.
[30] 陈婉玲. 经济法责任的归责原则[J].政法论坛,2010,28(6):161-167.
[31] 季奎明. 经济法中特殊法律责任的类型化研究[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2013,(7):160-166.
[32] 杨同宇. 经济法规制范畴的理论审思[J].中国法律评论,2023,(5):182-192.
[33] 单飞跃,余骁.经济法法律责任:语义、规范及其整体谱系——基于法律文本的实证分析[J].现代法学,2017,39(3):170-185.
[34] 邓伟. 经济法责任转向经济法后果的规范依据与理论基础[J].法学,2022,(5):176-191.
[35] 史际春. 改革开放40年:从懵懂到自觉的中国经济法[J].东方法学,2018,(6):70-82.
[36] 马辉. 经济法解释论的整体主义方法论立场阐释——以“知假买假”惩罚性赔偿争议为切入点[J].政治与法律,2022,(10):96-111.
[37] 张守文. 数据行为的经济法规制[J].中国法律评论,2023,(6):111-124.
[38] 宋亚辉.社会基础变迁与部门法分立格局的现代发展[J].法学家,2021,(1):1-14+191.
[39] 张世明. 反垄断法惩罚性赔偿责任的独特性[J].甘肃社会科学,2023,(2):129-140.
[40] 张守文. 论经济法治现代化[J].中国法学,2025,(1):29-48.
[41] 张文显. 二十世纪西方法哲学思潮研究[M].北京:法律出版社,1996.471-472.
[42] 史际春,姚海放.再识“责任”与经济法[J].江苏行政学院学报,2004,(2):93-98.
[43] 王磊. 程序法与实体法协动视野下的反垄断民事诉讼资格[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,39(6):87-96.
[44] 史际春. 由“3Q大战”对竞争执法权配置的再审视[J].经济法学评论,2011,11(1):347-351.
[45] (英)威廉·韦德.行政法[M].徐炳,楚建译.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1997.51.
[46] (美)E.博登海默.法理学——法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999.399.
[47] 颜运秋. 经济法与公益诉讼的契合性分析[J].北方法学,2007,(3):92-98. |
|
|
|
2025, Vol. 42 
