新世纪以来华语作家传记电影的纪实理念、诗性探索与经典化限度

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (601 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract As a sub-genre of biographical films, writer biopic films not only provide us with useful references for recalling cultural memories and tracing the lives of writers but also bridge the gap between popular literature and serious literature to a certain extent, filling the gap of humanistic spirit in film creation. Since the new century, compared with Western writer biopic films, Chinese writer biopic films have built up the genre elements of this series with their unique documentary concepts and poetic explorations. The research reveals that its documentary concept is embedded in the narrative practice of audiovisual translation and cross-media reconstruction, striving to establish a contractual relationship based on the commitment of biographical facts among creators, subjects, and audiences, seeking a balance between the narrative rights of creators, the privacy rights of subjects, and the right to know of audiences, and ultimately hoping to achieve a tacit understanding at the ethical level. Based on China’s unique literary tradition, creators pay more attention to concretizing and lyricizing the unique emotional world behind the works of writers. In this way, they achieve the ideological intention of spiritual homecoming. In terms of canonization construction, the understanding and grasp of the spiritual essence of writers and works significantly affect the ideological quality of such works. However, in the creation of such films, there are also issues such as the rigid perception of specific writers, vague genre awareness, and the lack of an established stable narrative style. These problems lead to shortcomings in the films’ ideological depth, narrative strategies, and genre style.

Key words： biographical film writer biopic films canonization cross-media adaptation film poetics

Received: 08 January 2025

PACS:

J901

About author:: 深圳市哲学社会科学规划一般课题“深圳电影产业的精品化建设路径研究”（SZ2024B030）

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHAN Di
	BIAN Xiang-bin

Cite this article:

ZHAN Di,BIAN Xiang-bin. The Documentary Concept, Poetic Exploration, and Limits of Canonization in Chinese Writer Biopic Films Since the New Century[J]. , 2025, 42(2): 124-132.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2025/V42/I2/124

[1] (英)特里·伊格尔顿.文化的观念[M].方洁译.南京:南京大学出版社,2006.12.
[2] 张骏祥. 用电影表现手段完成的文学——在一次导演总结会议上的发言[J].电影文化,1980,(2):1-60.
[3] 陈荒煤. 不要忘了文学[J].电影剧作,1982,(1):3-5.
[4] 郑雪来. 电影文学与电影特性问题——兼与张骏祥同志商榷[J].电影新作,1982,(5):79-83.
[5] Custen,George F.BioPics How Hollywood Constructed Pu-blic History[M].New Brunswick,NJ:Rutgers UP,1992.5.
[6] Tom Brown and Belén Vidal. The Biopic in Contemporary Film Culture[M].London:Routledge,2013.15.
[7] 赵白生. 传记文学理论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003.14.
[8] 董丽慧. “后当代艺术”:重回真实的三种理论路径及其问题[J].文艺研究,2021,(5):34-45.
[9] Terry Smith.Contemporary Art: World Currents[M].London: Laurence King, 2011.8-13.
[10] Raymond Williams.The English Novel from Dickens to Lawrence[M].London:The Hogarth Press,1984.14.
[11] (意)詹巴蒂斯塔·维柯.新科学[M].朱光潜译.北京:商务印书馆,2018.203.
[12] (法)茱莉亚·克里斯蒂娃.诗性语言的革命[M].张颖等译.成都:四川大学出版社,2016.9-10.
[13] 盖琪. 跨域想象/实践中的“不可靠叙述”与“女性讲史者”——重读电影《黄金时代》[J].文艺研究,2020,(9):123-134.
[14] 黄钟军. 作家纪录片与港台文学的影像传播[J].当代电影,2021,(9):98-103.
[15] 卞祥彬. 具身、隐身、去身:文学纪录片叙事主体的多元复现[J].当代电视,2021,(2):72-76.
[16] 刘素英. 中西戏剧的“戏剧性”比较[J].外语教学,2006,(3):93-96.
[17] (英)毛姆.作家笔记[M].陈德志,陈星评译.南京:南京大学出版社,2010.57.
[18] 何卫华. 雷蒙·威廉斯:文化研究与“希望的资源”[M].北京:商务印书馆,2017.52-53.
[19] 丁帆. 关于当代文学经典化过程的几点思考[J].文艺争鸣,2021,(2):30-33.
[20] 蒲锋.《萧红》——粗糙和无力[ED/OL].https://www.filmcr-itics.org.hk/zh-hant/,2024-11-05.
[21] 辜也平. 论中国现代传记文学的民族特色[J].文学评论,2005,(2):95-103.
[22] (美)勒内·韦勒克,奥斯汀·沃伦.文学理论[M].刘象愚译.北京:文化艺术出版社,2010.72.
[23] 张英进. 传记电影的叙事主体与客体:多层次生命写作的选择[J].文艺研究,2017,(2):85-93.
[24] 侯军,胡慧.传记电影的人物形象建构[J].当代电影,2016,(1):43-49.