公共数据授权运营中数据知识产权登记的制度重构

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (562 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Due to the inherent tension between profitability and public interest in the authorized operation of public data, the interim measures for data intellectual property registration issued across various regions have initially established a unified registration framework for public data sets involved in authorized operations. However, in practice, these measures expose several issues, including a disjunction between transaction security safeguards and the regulatory goals of maintaining open access, conflicts between voluntary registration and mandatory disclosure for authorized operations, and an emphasis on rights registration that weakens the role of public regulatory registration. The root of these problems lies in legislative bodies’ excessive focus on the transactional function of the data intellectual property registration system while neglecting its regulatory role in developing and utilizing public data. To achieve the goal of “clear ownership, defined responsibilities, and effective oversight” in the circulation of public data, it is necessary to strengthen the regulatory function of data intellectual property registration. This requires adhering to the dual logic of “autonomous efficiency” and “compliance control” in the authorized operation of public data. Within the framework of unified data intellectual property registration legislation, voluntary registration should be replaced by a mandatory registration system that grants exclusive rights in exchange for public disclosure of content. Additionally, regulatory item registration should be introduced to supplement information regarding the regulation of authorized public data operations. These reforms will facilitate the reconstruction of an integrated and legally trustworthy system for the circulation of data elements.

Key words： data intellectual property public data authorized operation unified registration regulatory items

Received: 20 September 2024

PACS:

D923.4

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	DENG She-min
	WANG Zhi-wen

Cite this article:

DENG She-min,WANG Zhi-wen. Institutional Reconstruction of Data Intellectual Property Registration in the Authorized Operation of Public Data[J]. , 2024, 41(6): 93-102.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2024/V41/I6/93

[1] 吕炳斌. 数据知识产权登记:商业秘密模式抑或数据库模式[J].知识产权,2024,(6):62-79.
[2] 孙清白. 公共数据授权运营营利性与公益性的冲突及其制度协调[J].行政法学研究,2024,(3):140-153.
[3] 杨清顺. 逻辑学家的非逻辑论断——关于若干逻辑问题的评析[J].华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1991,(2):84-90.
[4] 佟彤,雷国平.自然资源统一确权登记的入法路径与规则完善——兼论与不动产登记的立法协调[J].中国土地科学,2023,37(8):13-21.
[5] 宋烁. 构建以授权运营为主渠道的公共数据开放利用机制[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2023,41(1):83-94.
[6] 王敬波. 政府信息公开:国际视野与中国发展[M].北京:法律出版社,2016.10.
[7] 齐英程. 公共数据增值性利用的权利基础与制度构建[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,49(1):12-20.
[8] 陈宇,孙枭坤.政策模糊视阈下试点政策执行机制研究——基于低碳城市试点政策的案例分析[J].求实,2020,(2):46-64+110-111.
[9] 孙宪忠. 中国物权法总论[M].北京:法律出版社,2018. 101.
[10] (德)施密特·阿斯曼.秩序理念下的行政法体系建构[M].林明锵译.北京:北京大学出版社,2012.163.
[11] 张涛. 公共数据授权运营中的国家担保责任及其调控面向[J].清华法学,2024,18(2):18-30.
[12] 韩英夫. 《民法典》视域下登记制度革新与物权效力扩张[J].北方法学,2023,17(2):38-49.
[13] (德)卡尔·拉伦茨.法学方法论(第六版)[M].黄家镇译.北京:商务印书馆,2020.572.
[14] 汤贞友. 数据知识产权登记的制度逻辑及完善[J].知识产权,2024,(3):34-53.
[15] 谭佐财. 数据征用的理论证成与制度展开[J].法制与社会发展,2024,30(2):144-163.
[16] 王春晖.构建公共数据资源有序开发开放与流通使用的良好生态[EB/OL].https://wlaq.gmw.cn/2024-03/28/c-ontent_37231616.htm,2024-08-08.
[17] Nagaraj,A.The Private Impact of Public Data:Landsat Sa-tellite Maps Increased Gold Discoveries and Encouraged Entry[J].Management Science,2021,68(1):564-582.
[18] Twizeyimana,J D,Andersson,A.The Public Value of E-Government—A Literature Review[J].Government Infor-mation Quarterly,2019,36(2):167-178.
[19] 王旭. 论自然资源国家所有权的宪法规制功能[J].中国法学,2013,(6):5-19.
[20] 孙鹏. 民法上信赖保护制度及其法的构成——在静的安全与交易安全之间[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2005,(7):72-80.
[21] 马颜昕.18亿“政务数据第一拍”暂停,公共数据运营要警惕单纯逐利冲动[N].成都商报(电子版),2023-12-04(003).
[22] 郭洁. 自然资源统一登记的物权法问题及其破解[J].法学,2020,(3):124-141.
[23] 梁慧星,陈华彬.物权法(第七版)[M].北京:法律出版社,2020.103.
[24] 张力. 国家所有权遁入私法:路径与实质[J].法学研究,2016,38(4):3-22.
[25] 韩英夫. 自然资源统一确权登记改革的立法纾困[J].法学评论,2020,38(2):156-166.
[26] 李扬. 数据库法律保护研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.294-296.
[27] Sprigman,C.Reform(aliz)ing Copyright[J].Stanford Law Re-view,2004,57(2):485-568.
[28] 杨明. 论著作权公示原则的确立及实践路径——以《著作权法》修法为契机[J].中国出版,2020,(19):21-25.
[29] Purtova,N.Property in Personal Data:A European Pers-pective on the Instrumentalist Theory of Propertisation[J].European Journal of Legal Studies,2010,2(3):193-208.
[30] 张颖. 数字时代著作权公示失灵及其缓解路径[J].出版发行研究,2023,(8):64-71.
[31] (美)罗伯特·考特,托马斯·尤伦.法和经济学(第五版)[M].史晋川,董雪兵译.上海:格致出版社,2010.36.
[32] 高莉. 论数字时代知识产权法中的利益平衡[J].浙江学刊,2022,(4):59-69.
[33] 刘鑫. 大数据时代数据知识产权立法的理据与进路[J].知识产权,2023,(11):42-59.
[34] 邵红红. 数据产权登记的功能定位、模式选择与制度完善——以信号理论为切入点[J].知识产权,2024,(3):54-72.
[35] 王艺文. 不动产登记审查标准的理论重释与适用反思[J].中国不动产法研究,2023,(2):185-197.
[36] 胡凌. 论地方立法中公共数据开放的法律性质[J].地方立法研究,2019,4(3):1-18.
[37] 吴汉东. 数据财产赋权:从数据专有权到数据使用权[J].法商研究,2024,41(3):3-16.