乡村数智化治理的新质生产力逻辑、机制及进路

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (8)

Download: PDF (528 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Rural digital governance is a major theoretical and practical issue in China’s comprehensive promotion of rural revitalization strategy. Rural society is the “nerve endings” of national governance, which is related to the party’s ruling foundation at the grassroots level, and is also a weak link in the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity. Rural digital governance is based on big data, combined with artificial intelligence, digital twins, meta-universe, blockchain and other new productivity technologies, to realize the overall improvement of the effectiveness of rural social governance. Firstly, digital intelligence technology embedded in the agricultural industry generates new quality agricultural productivity, and realizes the optimal combination of new quality agricultural workers, new quality agricultural production materials, and new quality agricultural production objects, which will powerfully promote the high-quality development of the agricultural industry and realize the change of rural production relations. Secondly, through the use of digital twin technology, the digital portrait of rural society will be realized; the transformation of digital technology will be promoted to realize the digital shaping of rural social governance; and the application of digital intelligent scenes will be optimized to realize the digital casting of rural social governance. The new quality productivity of agriculture realizes the transformation of rural digital governance by driving the development of rural digital economy, the construction of rural digital society, and the construction of rural digital government and other mechanisms. Finally, the transformation of rural digital governance driven by new agricultural productivity is not a panacea for all rural social governance problems, and it is necessary to prevent the technological risks of digital intelligence, promote “science and technology for the good” through the “dual wisdom fusion” of artificial intelligence and the wisdom of the masses, and adapt to local conditions. It is necessary to promote the systematic optimization of rural digital governance through the “dual wisdom integration” of AI and the wisdom of the masses, the prevention of technical risks of digital intelligence, the promotion of “science and technology for the good”, and the optimization of “gradient embeddedness” according to local conditions.

Key words： rural digital and intellectual governance new quality productivity rural production relations theoretical logic driving mechanism practical approach

Received: 10 June 2024

PACS:

D035

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	XIAO Long
	MA Chao-feng

Cite this article:

XIAO Long,MA Chao-feng. The Logic, Mechanisms and Pathways of New Quality Productivity in the Transformation of Rural Numerical and Intelligent Governance[J]. , 2024, 41(4): 97-105.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2024/V41/I4/97

[1] 习近平. 发展新质生产力是推动高质量发展的内在要求和重要着力点[J].求是,2024,(11):1.
[2] 马克思恩格斯全集(第4卷)[M]马克思恩格斯全集(第4卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1958. 365.
[3] 马克思恩格斯文集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009. 602.
[4] 许丹,姜晓萍.中国式现代化进程中地方治理数智化变革风险及其实践规制[J].行政论坛,2024,31(1):54-64.
[5] (日)日本日立东大实验室.社会5.0:以人为中心的超级智能社会[M].沈丁心译.北京:机械工业出版社,2020.
[6] (日)福田雅树,林秀弥,成原慧.AI联结的社会[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2020.56-62.
[7] 吴理财,李佳莹.从“文字下乡”到“数字下乡”的百年乡村建设——基于政府治理的视角[J].中国农村观察,2023,(2):2-15.
[8] 习近平书信选集(第1卷)[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2022.362.
[9] 洪银兴,高培勇.新质生产力:发展新动能[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2024.55.
[10] (美)马丁·福特.机器人时代:技术、工作与经济的未来[M].王吉美,牛筱萌译.北京:中信出版社,2015.7-10.
[11] 陈东,秦子洋.人工智能与包容性增长——来自全球工业机器人使用的证据[J].经济研究,2022,57(4):85-102.
[12] 苏岚岚,彭艳玲.数字化教育、数字素养与农民数字生活[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,20(3):27-40.
[13] 张峻恺. 数智乡村振兴[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2022. 4.
[14] 林毅夫等. 新质生产力:中国创新发展的着力点与内在逻辑[M].北京:中信出版社,2024.57-63.
[15] 吴重庆,张慧鹏.小农与乡村振兴——现代农业产业分工体系中小农户的结构性困境与出路[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(1):13-24+163.
[16] 胡凌啸,王亚华.小农户和现代农业发展有机衔接:全球视野与中国方案[J].改革,2022,(12):89-101.
[17] 陈根. 数字孪生[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2020.3-5.
[18] 肖涵,张乾友.数字孪生与科层制的他在性建构[J].学海,2024,(3):170-179.
[19] 米加宁,章昌平,李大宇等.“数字空间”政府及其研究纲领——第四次工业革命引致的政府形态变革[J].公共管理学报,2020,17(1):1-17+168.
[20] 马超峰,薛美琴.梯度嵌入与数字反哺:数字乡村建设中新农人的数字转化逻辑[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,23(3):11-19.
[21] (美)詹姆斯·C.斯科特.国家的视角:那些试图改善人类状况的项目是如何失败的[M].王晓毅译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2019.4-66.
[22] 蔡跃洲. 中国共产党领导的科技创新治理及其数字化转型——数据驱动的新型举国体制构建完善视角[J].管理世界,2021,37(8):30-46.
[23] 姜亦炜.数字化平台推动乡村多元主体参与[N].中国社会科学报,2022-08-10(001).
[24] 王绍光. 毛泽东的逆向政治参与模式——群众路线[J].学习月刊,2009,(23):16-17.
[25] 段治文,郑珺.数字技术赋能全过程人民民主的运行机理及实践进路[J].浙江工商大学学报,2024,(6):1-12.
[26] 何艳玲,蒋良竹.人民算法:如何理解治理过程中的“人民”[J].治理研究,2024,40(3):4-23+157.
[27] 刘永谋. 技术治理通论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2023. 10.
[28] 王鑫. 在共生中抵抗:算法社会的技术迷思与主体之困[J].东南学术,2023,(4):218-228.
[29] Lash S.Power after hegemony:Cultural studies in muta-tion?[J].Theory, culture & society,2007,24(3):55-78.
[30] 袁超. “技术利维坦”的傲慢与偏见——以“社会化技术权力”为中心的讨论[J].人文杂志,2021,(8):122-128.
[31] 张爱军.“算法利维坦”的风险及其规制[J].探索与争鸣,2021,(1):95-102+179.
[32] 唐任伍,史晓雯.人工智能赋能基层治理的运行机制与风险规避[J].探索,2024,(1):103-114.
[33] 欧树军.灵境内外:互联网治理简史[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2023.6.
[34] 刘永谋.伪技术治理:类型、逻辑与应对[J].探索与争鸣,2022,(11):132-139+180-181.
[35] 赵玉洁. 培育社会与保卫社会:中国社会发展的双重使命[J].科学社会主义,2018,(3):50-56.
[36] 习近平.“不能把手里吃饭的家伙先扔了”(两会现场观察·微镜头·习近平总书记两会“下团组”)[N].人民日报. 2022-03-06(004).
[37] 贺雪峰.南北中国:村庄社会结构视角的中国区域差异[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2013,27(3):20-22.
[38] 马超峰. 制度画像与行动呈像:乡风文明建设中的双重可视化路径——基于山西Y县积分制的案例观察[J].探索,2023,(6):147-160.
[39] 蔡跃洲. 中国共产党领导的科技创新治理及其数字化转型——数据驱动的新型举国体制构建完善视角[J].管理世界,2021,37(8):30-46.
[40] 彭亚平. 技术治理的悖论:一项民意调查的政治过程及其结果[J].社会,2018,38(3):46-78.
[41] 吕德文.治理技术如何适配国家机器——技术治理的运用场景及其限度[J].探索与争鸣,2019,(6):59-67+158.