从史事、事势到功夫：宋明理学的历史形上学维度

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (554 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Although the Neo-Confucianism of the Song and Ming dynasties emphasize “Xin” and “Xing”, it also has a value orientation of “praising the transformation and education of heaven and earth” to construct social order. Taking “Lǐ” as the highest principle, Confucian scholars of the Song and Ming dynasties followed the understanding of “Shì Zhě Wéi Yě” and believed that “Shì” are dynamic developments under the influence of time consciousness, and are accordingly presented as historical processes. That is “Shì Yǐ Chéng Shǐ”. This process often affected and restricted by “Shì”, thus forming the distinction between “Shì Shì” and “Lǐ Shì”. “Shì Shì” is used by Confucian scholars of the Song and Ming dynasties to express the specific background in which “Shì” unfold, as well as the future development trend. It is the unity of objectivity and inevitability; while “Lǐ Shì” refers to the regulations of everything and the inevitable trend of world change, and takes the dual connotation of course and necessity. Whether it is “Shì Shì” or “Lǐ Shì”, it involves a wider range of facts and values, and has unique metaphysical meaning in Neo-Confucianism of the Song and Ming Dynasties. In the context of “Shì Yǐ Chéng Shì”, the “Shì Zhōng Qiu Lǐ” in Neo-Confucianism of the Song and Ming dynasties can be reduced to “Shǐ Shì Qiu Lǐ”. Extending to the practical level, it points to“Shì Zhōng Qiu Lǐ”, “Shùn Shì 耘鸳r Shì” and “Shì Yǐ Chéng Shì”. The concern for the historical metaphysics of Neo-Confucianism in the Song and Ming dynasties lies in exploring the ultimate concern and realistic logic of constructing a metaphysical philosophical system in Neo-Confucianism in the Song and Ming dynasties.

Key words： “Shǐ Shì” “Shì Shì” the Song and Ming Neo-Confucianism historical metaphysics “Gōng Fu”

Received: 26 January 2024

PACS:

B244

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	HUANG He

Cite this article:

HUANG He. From “Shǐ Shì”, “Shì Shì” to “Gōng Fu”: The Historico-metaphysical Dimension of Neo-Confucianism in the Song and Ming Dynasties[J]. , 2024, 41(2): 132-140.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2024/V41/I2/132

[1] (汉)司马迁.史记(第130卷)[M].(南朝宋)裴骃集解,(唐)司马贞索隐,,1982.3297.
[2] 张岱年. 张岱年全集(第5卷)[M].石家庄:河北人民出版社,1996.655.
[3] (宋)周敦颐.周敦颐集[M].陈克明点校.北京:中华书局,2009.
[4] 钱穆. 宋明理学概述[M].北京:九州出版社,2014.35.
[5] (宋)邵雍.邵雍集[M].郭彧整理.北京:中华书局,2010.
[6] (宋)朱熹.朱子全书(第二十四册)[M].朱杰人等主编.上海:上海古籍出版社;合肥:安徽教育出版社,2002.3879.
[7] 杨国荣. 现代视域中的儒学[J].上海行政学院学报,2012,(3):13-17.
[8] (宋)程颢,(宋)程颐.二程集[M].王孝鱼点校.北京:中华书局,1981.
[9] (宋)张载.张载集[M].章锡琛点校.北京:中华书局,1978.
[10] (宋)陆九渊.陆九渊集[M].钟哲点校.北京:中华书局,1980.
[11] 钱穆. 中国历史精神[M].北京:九州出版社,2012.5.
[12] (宋)朱熹.朱子语类(卷第十一)[M].(宋)黎靖德编,王星贤点校.北京:中华书局,1986.
[13] (宋)朱熹.朱子语类(卷第八十三)[M].(宋)黎靖德编,王星贤点校.北京:中华书局,1986.
[14] (汉)许慎.说文解字[M].陶生魁点校.北京:中华书局,2020.98.
[15] (英)沃尔什.历史哲学导论[M].何兆武,张文杰译.北京:北京大学出版社,2008.14.
[16] 杨国荣.人与世界:以“事”观之[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2021.198.
[17] (清)王梓材,(清)冯云濠.宋元学案补遗[M].沈芝盈,梁运华点校.北京:中华书局,2012.2741.
[18] (明)王守仁.王阳明全集(卷一)[M].吴光等编校.上海:上海古籍出版社,2018.11.
[19] (西汉)贾谊. 贾谊集[M].(明)何孟春订注,彭吴,赵冒力点校.长沙:岳麓书社,2010.8-9.
[20] (唐)刘禹锡.刘禹锡集[M].《刘禹锡集》整理组点校,卞孝萱校订.北京:中华书局,1990.70-71.
[21] 全宋文(第二百四十三册)[M].曾枣庄,刘琳主编.上海:上海辞书出版社;合肥:安徽教育出版社,2006.69.
[22] (宋)朱熹.朱子语类(卷第二十四)[M].(宋)黎靖德编,王星贤点校.北京:中华书局,1986.
[23] (宋)朱熹.朱子语类(卷第一百八)[M].(宋)黎靖德编,王星贤点校.北京:中华书局,1986.2684.
[24] (宋)朱熹.朱子语类(卷第七十)[M].(宋)黎靖德编,王星贤点校.北京:中华书局,1986.1761.
[25] (宋)朱熹.朱子语类(卷第一百三十九)[M].(宋)黎靖德编,王星贤点校.北京:中华书局,1986.3303.
[26] (日)三浦国雄.朱子的历史意识[A].吴震,(日)吾妻重二主编.思想与文献:日本学者宋明儒学研究[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2010.99.
[27] 全宋文(第二百九十五册)[M].曾枣庄,刘琳主编.上海:上海辞书出版社;合肥:安徽教育出版社,2006.309.
[28] (宋)朱熹.四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,2016.
[29] (宋)朱熹.朱子全书(第六册)[M].朱杰人等主编.上海:上海古籍出版社;合肥:安徽教育出版社,2002.948.
[30] (宋)朱熹.朱子语类(卷第七十五)[M].(宋)黎靖德编,王星贤点校.北京:中华书局,1986.1935.
[31] (宋)朱熹.朱子语类(卷第一百三十三)[M].(宋)黎靖德编,王星贤点校.北京:中华书局,1986.3198.
[32] (清)王夫之.思问录[M].王伯详点校.北京:中华书局,2009.29.
[33] 唐君毅. 中国哲学原论·原教篇[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006.443.