|
|
|
| Theoretical Proof and Institutional Development of Data Trust |
| ZHANG Li, HE Yu-ze |
| Civil and Commercial Law School, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, 401120 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Data trusts have unique advantages in protecting data source entities, improving data circulation efficiency, and improving data regulatory systems. Although trust is a system originating from the Anglo-American legal system, its flexible interpretation of the concept of ownership provides new possibilities for exploring the interpretation of data in property law, thereby providing theoretical support for the separation of data property rights. There is also a value consistency between the fiduciary duty in trust and the protection of personal interests in the circulation of personal data. In specific mode planning, the data trustee should serve as the center, representing the data source entity to carry out data authorization, management, and trading activities. Data trust is essentially still a trust activity, and the interpretation of its legal relationship should start from the Trust Law and integrate other relevant legal norms: firstly, in the choice of data trustee subjects, data exchanges should be the best choice; secondly, the data screening for entering data trusts can refer to relevant grading standards and be confirmed through trust registration; once again, the scope of the fiduciary duty of the trustee should be based on the principle of personal interests in the data, with economic interests as exceptions; finally, the responsibility of the trustee should be determined separately based on different circumstances.
|
|
Received: 25 February 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 翟志勇. 论数据信托:一种数据治理的新方案[J].东方法学,2021,(4):61-76.
[2] Lilian E.The Problem with Privacy[J].International Revi-ew of Law Computers & Technology,2005,18(3):263-294.
[3] 蔡丽楠.数据信托参与数据治理:理论逻辑与实现机制[J].金融评论,2022,(1):66-79+123.
[4] 闫夏秋,杨鑫逸.衍生数据信托的适格性与本土化建构[J].征信,2023,(6):52-58.
[5] Bert-Jaap Koops.The Trouble with European Data Protec-tion Law[J].International Data Privacy Law,2014,4(4):250-261.
[6] 宁园. 从数据生产到数据流通:数据财产权益的双层配置方案[J].法学研究,2023,(3):73-91.
[7] 唐要家,马中雨.数据监管制度框架与体系完善[J].长白学刊,2023,(6):100-107.
[8] The GPAI Data Governance Working Group.Enabling Data Sharing for Social Benefit through Data Trusts[EB/OL].https://gpai.ai/projects/data-governance/data-trusts/enab-ling-data-sharing-for-social-benefit-data-trusts-interim-report.pdf,2024-02-09.
[9] Jack M.Balkin.Information Fiduciaries and the First Amendment[J].U. C. Davis Law Review,2016,49(4):1183-1234.
[10] 丁凤玲,彭建.还数于民:实现个人数据自决的“新”数据中介[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023,(4):74-84.
[11] 李仁真. 国际金融法学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2004. 327-329.
[12] 李群星. 信托的法律性质与基本理念[J].法学研究,2000,(3):118-126.
[13] 韩良,聂俊峰.《民法典》与《信托法》的完善[J].中国金融,2021,(11):94-96.
[14] 王涌. 寻找法律概念的“最小公分母”——霍菲尔德法律概念分析思想研究[J].比较法研究,1998,(2):41-55.
[15] 冉昊. 财产权的历史变迁[J].中外法学,2018,(2):379-392.
[16] 王利明. 论数据权益:以“权利束”为视角[J].政治与法律,2022,(7):99-113.
[17] 闫立东. 以“权利束”视角探究数据权利[J].东方法学,2019,(2):57-67.
[18] 王涌. 论信托法与物权法的关系——信托法在民法法系中的问题[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,(6):93-101.
[19] 阳晓伟,杨春学.“公地悲剧”与“反公地悲剧”的比较研究[J].浙江社会科学,2019,(3):4-13+38+155.
[20] 彭辉. 数据权属的逻辑结构与赋权边界——基于“公地悲剧”和“反公地悲剧”的视角[J].比较法研究,2022,(1):101-115.
[21] 夏义堃,管茜,李纲.数据信托的内涵、生成逻辑与实现路径——基于数据流通视角的分析[J].图书情报知识,2022,(5):109-119.
[22] 范世乾. 信义义务的概念[J].湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,(1):62-66.
[23] 邢会强. 数据控制者的信义义务理论质疑[J].法制与社会发展,2021,(4):143-158.
[24] 许可.诚信原则:个人信息保护与利用平衡的信任路径[J].中外法学,2022,(5):1143-1162.
[25] 楼建波,姜雪莲.信义义务的法理研究——兼论大陆法系国家信托法与其他法律中信义义务规则的互动[J].社会科学,2017,(1):92-102.
[26] 朱圆. 论信义法的基本范畴及其在我国民法典中的引入[J].环球法律评论,2016,(2):81-97.
[27] Sitkoff R. H.The Economic Structure of Fiduciary Law[J].Boston University Law Review,2011,91(3):1039-1050.
[28] George Zarkadakis.“Data Trusts” Could Be the Key to Better AI[EB/OL].https://hbr.org/2020/11/data-trusts-cou-ld-be-the-key-to-better-ai,2024-02-09.
[29] 魏远山,刘妍.个人数据信托的类型抉择与制度设计[J].图书馆论坛,2023,(11):70-78.
[30] 贺小石.数据信托:个人网络行为信息保护的新方案[J].探索与争鸣,2022,(12):197-204+214.
[31] 陈乃新. 剩余权论──经济法的基本理论范畴探微[J].财经论丛(浙江财经学院学报),1999,(1):71-75.
[32] 姜宇. 数据要素市场化的一种方案:基于数据信托的数据交易所机制重构[J].电子政务,2023,(7):12-26.
[33] 王琎. 数据交易场所的机制构建与法律保障——以数据要素市场化配置为中心[J].江汉论坛,2021,(9):129-137.
[34] 包晓丽,杜万里.数据可信交易体系的制度构建——基于场内交易视角[J].电子政务,2023,(6):38-50.
[35] 许可.诚信原则:个人信息保护与利用平衡的信任路径[J].中外法学,2022,(5):1143-1162.
[36] 齐英程. 我国个人信息匿名化规则的检视与替代选择[J].环球法律评论,2021,(3):52-66.
[37] 丁晓东. 论数据来源者权利[J].比较法研究,2023,(3):14-25.
[38] 程啸. 论数据产权登记[J].法学评论,2023,(4):137-148.
[39] 韩强,吴涛.论数据要素收益分配的制度基础——基于用益补偿的视角[J].行政管理改革,2023,(5):49-57.
[40] 付伟,李晓东.个人数据的法律权利与经济权利配置研究[J].电子政务,2021,(9):73-80.
[41] 申卫星,李夏旭.个人数据所有权的赋权逻辑与制度展开[J].法学评论,2023,(5):114-128.
[42] 张力,郑志峰.侵权责任法中的第三人侵权行为——与杨立新教授商榷[J].现代法学,2015,(1):32-46.
[43] 邓峰. 业务判断规则的进化和理性[J].法学,2008,(2):68-80.
[44] 叶嘉敏. 个人信息收集视域下数据信托解释论研究[J].内蒙古社会科学,2022,(2):94-103.
[45] 李攀. 信托法归入救济的规范解释与规则适用[J].法律方法,2023,(1):398-418.
[46] 董文. 算法错误侵害的社会化救济进路探讨[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2023,(2):36-49. |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 41 
