|
|
|
| Bilateral Patriarchy: The Intergenerational Relationship and Its Practical Logic in “Bilocal Marriage” |
| SU Yun-xun |
| School of Politics and Public Administration, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450001 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract “Bilateral patriarchy” is a new family power relationship pattern with three pillars: in-laws, blood relatives and intergenerational relationships. The bilateral practice in the form of “bilocal marriage” has attracted widespread attention and discussion in the academic community. However, existing research lacks a systematic research on the intergenerational interaction mechanisms of “bilocal marriage”. Fieldwork research based on southern Jiangsu found that the practice of “bujia buqu”, “residing-both-sides”, unified kinship title, bilateral inheritance and support, and equal rights to bear surnames are increasingly common, and a relatively stable mode of intergenerational interaction has gradually formed. In this bilateral generational interaction mode, the female family plays an increasingly prominent role in the small family. Based on the emotional demands for intergenerational intimacy, the value demands for family continuity and the equal rights demands of dual-line family, parents on both sides continuously deepening their intervention in the small family, thus forming a “bilateral patriarchy” pattern. Under this pattern, dual-line native families provide sufficient economic and human support for small families. This not only enables young couples to maintain a middle-class life, but also liberates them from family life to some extent, thus better handling the relationship between family and career, which is particularly important for young women. In return, small families also have to transfer some of its rights to both parents in order to maintain intergenerational balance and mutual benefit. The proposal of “bilateral patriarchy” breaks through the assumption of patrilineal monogamous families in patriarchy theory and further enriches and promotes patriarchal theory.
|
|
Received: 24 October 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 金一虹. 中国新农村性别结构变迁研究——流动的父权[M].南京:南京师范大学出版社,2015.2.
[2] 瞿同祖. 中国法律与中国社会[M].北京:中华书局,2003.5.
[3] 杨善华,沈崇麟.城乡家庭——市场经济与非农化背景下的变迁[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2000.106.
[4] 罗小锋. 父权的延续——基于对农民工家庭的质性研究[J].青年研究,2011,(2):61-71.
[5] 朱宇晶. 表征性父权:传统、女性策略与父权再生产[J].民俗研究,2017,(3):76-85.
[6] 金一虹. 流动的父权:流动农民家庭的变迁[J].中国社会科学,2010,(4):151-165.
[7] 宋丽娜.双系婚姻:对于苏南“并家”习俗的功能主义解释——以在安置房社区的调研为例[J].当代青年研究,2020,(6):111-117.
[8] 黄佳琦. 代际交换下家庭权力关系重构——基于苏南农村并家婚姻模式的田野调查[J].天府新论,2021,(2):127-139.
[9] 袁明宝. 并家婚姻下的家庭权力变迁与家庭关系理性化——以苏南农村并家现象为例[J].兰州学刊,2021,(5):168-180.
[10] 黄亚慧. 并家婚姻中女儿的身份与地位[J].妇女研究论丛,2013,(4):109-114.
[11] 班涛. 年轻夫妇“两头走”——乡村家庭权力结构变迁的新现象[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016,(2):87-92.
[12] 庄孔韶,张静.“并家婚”家庭策略的“双系”实践[J].贵州民族研究,2019,(3):41-45.
[13] 费孝通. 生育制度[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2021.219.
[14] 刁统菊. 华北乡村社会姻亲关系研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2016.
[15] 杨华. 隐藏的世界:湘南水村妇女的人生归属与生命意义[D].武汉:华中科技大学博士学位论文,2010.240.
[16] 张卫国,廖静如.“嫁出去的女儿泼出去的水?”——改革开放后中国北方农村已婚妇女与娘家日益密切的关系[J].中国乡村研究,2010,(1):292-315.
[17] 史宝金. 论汉语亲属称谓的特征及其社会历史文化背景[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2003,(2):132-123.
[18] 周飞舟. 差序格局和伦理本位从丧服制度看中国社会结构的基本原则[J].社会,2015,(1):26-48.
[19] 费孝通. 家庭结构变动中的老年赡养问题——再论中国家庭结构的变动[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1983,(3):7-16.
[20] 阎云翔. 私人生活的变革——一个中国村庄里的爱情、家庭与亲密关系(1949-1999)[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2017.247.
[21] 阎云翔,杨雯琦.社会自我主义:中国式亲密关系——中国北方农村的代际亲密关系与下行式家庭主义[J].探索与争鸣,2017,(7):4-15.
[22] 钟晓慧,何式凝.协商式亲密关系:独生子女父母对家庭关系和孝道的期待[J].开放时代,2014,(1):155-175.
[23] 刘汶蓉. 转型期的家庭代际情感与团结——基于上海两类“啃老”家庭的比较[J].社会学研究,2016,(4):145-168.
[24] 贺雪峰. 农民价值观的类型及相互关系——对当前中国农村严重伦理危机的讨论[J].开放时代,2008,(3):51-58.
[25] 沈燕. “两家并一家”之传宗接代的另类解读——阴间与阳间的连结[J].民俗研究,2018,(1):136-145.
[26] 侯佳伟,黄四林,辛自强,等.中国人口生育意愿变迁:1980—2011[J].中国社会科学,2014,(4):78-97.
[27] 沈毅,周雅静.双系家庭主义、代际关系嵌入与第三代姓氏选择——基于南通地区二孩姓氏“一边一个”“并家婚”案例研究[J].江苏行政学院学报,2021,(4):66-74.
[28] 李霞. 娘家与婆家——华北农村妇女的生活空间和后台权力[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2010.80.
[29] 纪芳. 并家模式下的家庭权力重构及其实践逻辑——基于苏南农村的并家经验考察[J].天府新论,2020,(1):96-102. |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 41 
