国内法院解释条约的静态规则和动态协调

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (514 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract As for the interpretation of treaties by domestic courts, two dimensions should be studied at the same time. One is static rules, which is to solve the problem of the rules of treaty interpretation by courts. The second is dynamic harmonization, which aims to achieve the harmonization of treaty interpretation factors, interpretation paths and interpretation results. As far as the static rules, the court should not adopt the rules of contract interpretation or the rules of domestic law interpretation, but the rules of international law interpretation. To be specific, the court shall interpret the treaty in accordance with the rules provided by the treaty to be interpreted and Articles 31-33 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, which embody interpretation rules of customary international law. As far as dynamic harmonization, the court should take the interpretation results as the anchor, adjust and optimize the interpretation path, and choose appropriate interpretation factors or a combination of interpretation factors in order to interpret treaties. To be specific, firstly, the factors to be taken into account by the court include the usual meaning, object and purpose, context, subsequent agreement and subsequent practice. Secondly, in the interpretation path, the court should choose the appropriate interpretation factor or combination of interpretation factors according to the internal logic of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and if the interpreted treaty itself has special provisions for its interpretation, the court should apply such provisions. Thirdly, for interpretation results, the court should abide by pacta sunt sevenda, interpret the treaty in good faith, deal with the connection between the interpreted treaty and domestic law, and should not exceed the scope of its judicial jurisdiction.

Key words： treaty interpretation contract interpretation domestic law interpretation international law interpretation interpretation factors

Received: 11 October 2023

PACS:

D993.8

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Da-peng

Cite this article:

LI Da-peng. Static Rules and Dynamic Harmonization of Treaty Interpretation by Domestic Court[J]. , 2024, 41(1): 114-124.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2024/V41/I1/114

[1] 韩燕煦. 条约解释的要素与结构[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2015.
[2] 张乃根.探析条约解释的若干问题:国内法与国际法的视角[J].国际法研究,2016,(5).
[3] (奥)汉斯·凯尔森.纯粹法学说[M].雷磊译.北京:法律出版社,2021.
[4] 舒国滢,王夏昊,雷磊.法学方法论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2018.333-334.
[5] (德)伯恩·魏德士.法理学[M].丁晓春,吴越译.北京:法律出版社,2013.301.
[6] 万鄂湘,石磊,杨成铭等.国际条约法[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,1998.
[7] 车丕照. 条约解释的要义在于明确当事国的合意[J].上海政法学院学报(法治论丛),2020,(1):21.
[8] Hugo Grotius.The Rights of War and Peace (Book II)[M]. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc.,2005.849.
[9] Myres Smith MacDougal, Harold Dwight Lasswell, James C Miller. The Interpretation of International Agreement and World Public Order[M].Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Pub-lishers,1994.92-93.
[10] Colin Warbrick.International Law in English Courts: Recent Cases[J].International & Comparative Law Quar-terly,2003,52(3):824.
[11] (德)齐佩利乌斯.法学方法论[M].金振豹译.北京:法律出版社,2018.31.
[12] Caleb Nelson.Originalism and Interpretive Conventions[J].University of Chicago Law Review,2003,70(2):555.
[13] Andrew Clapham.Brierly’s Law of Nations (7th Edition) [M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,2012.352.
[14] 李浩培. 条约法概论[M].北京:法律出版社,1987.10.
[15] 韩燕煦. 条约解释的特点——同国内法解释的比较研究[J].环球法律评论,2008,(1):114.
[16] 杜焕芳. 国际私法条约解释的路径依赖与方法展开[J].中国法学,2014,(2):243.
[17] Richard Gardiner.Treaty Interpretation(2nd Edition)[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2015.
[18] (英)劳特派特.奥本海国际法(上卷第二分册)[M].王铁崖,陈体强译.北京:商务出版社,1981.
[19] Gunther Dalhoff.International Court of Justice[M].Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2012.1784.
[20] 张乃根. 条约解释的国际法(上)[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2019.36.
[21] Malgosia Fitzmaurice, Olufemi Elias, Panos Merkouris.Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties[M].Boston:Martinus Nijhoff Publisher,2010. 129.
[22] Helmut Philipp Aust, Georg Nolte.The Interpretation of International Law by Domestic Courts Uniformity, Diver-sity,Convergence[M].New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[23] Odile Ammann.Domestic Courts and the Interpretation of International Law[M].Leiden:Brill Nijhoff,2020.229-233.
[24] H P Aust, A Rodiles, P Staubach.Unity or Uniformity? Domestic Courts and Treaty Interpretation[J].Leiden Jou-rnal of International Law,2014,27(1):95.
[25] 范宇文. 明确解释规则,学习解释艺术——《条约解释》评介[J].北大国际法与比较法评论, 2015,(1): 301.
[26] (德)托马斯·M·J·默勒斯.法学方法论[M].杜志浩译.北京:北京大学出版社,2022.187.
[27] United Nations.Yearbook of the ILC, Vol II[R/OL].https://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/english/ilc_1966_v2.pdf,2023-10-30.
[28] (德)卡尔·拉伦茨.法学方法论[M].陈爱娥译.北京:商务印书馆,2016.224.
[29] (美)巴里·E·卡特,艾伦·S·韦纳.国际法(上)[M].冯洁菡译.北京:商务印书馆,2015.125.
[30] 顾微微,徐慎丽.从契约到条约看私法理念对国际法的影响[J].南通大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(4):36-38.
[31] Hersch Lauterpacht.Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treati-es[J].British Yearbook of International Law,1949,(26):56.
[32] Kolb Robert.Good Faith in International Law[M].Oxford: Hart Publishing,2017.62-63.
[33] 徐锦堂. 关于国际条约国内适用的几个问题[J].国际法研究,2014,(3):69-73.
[34] 李旺. 论国际民商事条约的适用——以国际民商事条约与国际私法的关系为视角[J].法学家,2014,(4):108.
[35] 霍政欣. 国际私法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2020.13.
[36] 张文显.法理学(第五版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2018.250.
[37] 刘雪红. 论条约演化解释对国家同意原则的冲击[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2017,(3):58-59.