|
|
|
| The Development Logic and Construction Path of Digital Intelligence in Legal Services Based on the Artificial Intelligence Generated Content |
| YANG Li-min |
| College of Humanities, Donghua University, Shanghai, 200051 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract While renovating the operational scenario of legal service to a new stage, generative artificial intelligence also has a structural impact on legal professions both “instrumentally” and “conceptually”, forcing legal practitioners to face the transformation of professional roles and job attributes. From a functionalist perspective, it is no longer acceptable that we limit our stances and means to existing institutional systems and professional logic when probing into the status and role of generative AI in legal service. On the contrary, investigators ought to go beyond traditional and professional perspectives and “instrumental” positions, to understand the complex dynamics and uncertainties of the digital development of legal service, and to comprehensively examine the technical mechanism, industry feasibility and empowerment modes of generative AI’s application in legal service, and on the basis of which, to analyze the “de-skilling” phenomenon within legal professions that may be triggered by the “instrumental theory” psychology, and further explore generative AI’s role in reshaping the basic connotation, operational paradigm, group composition, market supply relationship, and other aspects of legal services. However, when examining the relationship between law and technology from a macroscopic view, it is obvious that generative AI remains far from completely replacing the legal profession group, as some fundamental issues inherent in its derivative logic and the inherent tension between AI technology and the inherent attributes of law have not yet been resolved. Empowering legal services with generative AI requires reconciling the attribute tension between the legal profession and intelligent technology at the national, professional, market, and technological levels, and paying attention to potential risks.
|
|
Received: 10 October 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] (美)丹尼尔·D·李.法律与人工智能:用ChatGPT塑造法律实践的未来[J].管斌,宋博文译.财经法学,2023,(4):181-192.
[2] 杨立民. 律师职业人工智能化的限度及其影响[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2018,35(2):82-90.
[3] 於兴中,郑戈,丁晓东.生成式人工智能与法律的六大议题:以ChatGPT为例[J].中国法律评论,2023,50(2):1-20.
[4] 魏斌. 论新一代法律智能系统的融合性道路[J].法学论坛,2023,38(3):15-26.
[5] 周维栋. 生成式人工智能类案裁判的标准及价值边界[J].东方法学,2023,(3):47-60.
[6] 孙祁. 规范生成式人工智能产品提供者的法律问题研究[J].政治与法律,2023,(7):162-176.
[7] 程乐. 生成式人工智能的法律规制——以ChatGPT为视角[J].政法论丛,2023,(4):69-80.
[8] 张凌寒. 生成式人工智能的法律定位与分层治理[J].现代法学,2023,45(4):126-141.
[9] 王禄生. 从进化到革命:ChatGPT类技术影响下的法律行业[J].东方法学,2023,(4):56-67.
[10] 李学尧. 法律职业主义[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2007.265-266.
[11] (德)马克斯·韦伯.经济与社会(下)[M].林荣译.北京:商务印书馆,1997.246.
[12] (英)齐格蒙·鲍曼.立法者与阐释者[M].洪涛译.上海:上海人民出版社,2000.64.
[13] (法)米歇尔·福柯.规训与惩罚:监狱的诞生[M].刘北成,杨远婴译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1999. 29.
[14] 季卫东. 论法制的权威[J].中国法学,2013,(1):21-29.
[15] 韩旭至. 生成式人工智能治理的逻辑更新与路径优化 ——以人机关系为视角[J].行政法学研究,2023,(6):30-42.
[16] 邱昭继. 人工智能、法律解析与未来法律实践[J].政法论丛,2022,(4):83-93.
[17] (美)迪特里希·鲁施迈耶.律师与社会:美德两国法律职业比较研究[M].于宵译.上海:上海三联书店,2014.10.
[18] 邱遥堃. 走出虚拟世界:元宇宙热的批判性解释[J].中外法学,2023,35(4):1080-1099.
[19] (美)理查德·L·埃贝尔.美国律师[M].张元元,张国峰译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2009.146-148.
[20] 余盛峰.临界:人工智能时代的全球法变迁[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2023.2.
[21] 曹建峰.人工智能、区块链等新技术影响法律的三个趋势[EB/OL].https://36kr.com/p/1722843922433,2023-09-30.
[22] 张欣. 生成式人工智能的数据风险与治理路径[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2023,(5):42-54.
[23] 汪德嘉.区块链是开启人工智能大时代的关键变量[EB/OL].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/HE0J9lLCXd3Y7oDi-57iqA,2023-09-30.
[24] 王禄生. ChatGPT类技术:法律人工智能的改进者还是颠覆者?[J].政法论坛,2023,41(4):49-62.
[25] 钭晓东. 论生成式人工智能的数据安全风险及回应型治理[J].东方法学,2023,(5):106-116.
[26] 支振锋. 生成式人工智能大模型的信息内容治理[J].政法论坛,2023,41(4):34-48. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 40 
