|
|
|
| Ogyu Sorai's Jue Ju Jie and the Rise of Ming Poetry Comments in Japan |
| CHEN Yu-qiang |
| School of Chinese Language and Literature, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, 071002 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract To discuss the comments on Ming poetry by Japanese literati is not to look for the incomplete dreams of Ming Dynasty in Japanese Han literature, but to reconstruct the understanding of Ming poetry from the perspective of East Asia. After the demise of the Ming Dynasty, literati in the early Qing Dynasty tended to negate the poetry since the middle of the Ming Dynasty, which was unfair. As the observation result of “the third eye”, the comments on Ming poetry by Japanese literati have certain reference value. Japanese literati's comments on Ming poetry flourished in the middle of the Edo era, which was caused by the route of learning poetry from Ming poetry to Tang poetry, and was also related to their ideological turn in criticizing Song culture and their intention to continue the orthodox fate of Chinese culture. To explore the rise of comments on Ming poetry in Japan, Ogyu Sorai's Jue Ju Jie(Annotation of Quatrains,绝句解) cannot be bypassed, which focuses on commenting on the poetry of the Seven Poets School in the Ming Dynasty, especially on all the seven character quatrains and nearly 90% of the five character quatrains of Li Panlong. The comment on Ming poetry in Jue Ju Jie has the characteristics of concise language, profound emotion and profound taste. It reveals that the poetry of the Seven Poets School in the Ming Dynasty agrees with Tang poetry in terms of artistic conception, poetic flavor and syntax, thus provides a model for Japanese literati to see the beauty of Tang poetry from Ming poetry. It also reveals the causal relationship between Ming poetry and poetry of the Six Dynasties, which provides guidance for exploring the complex features of the poetry style of the Seven Poets Schools in the Ming Dynasty. Jue Ju Jie reconstructs the model of Ming poetry from the Japanese perspective, and puts forward its own views on important issues in the history of Ming poetry. The new ideas revealed from it serve as discursive feedback, which will help us reevaluate Ming poetry from the perspective of East Asia.
|
|
Received: 17 October 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] (日)长沢规矩也.和刻本汉诗集成·总集篇:第7辑[Z].东京:古典研究会,1979.252.
[2] (日)宇佐美惠.绝句解拾遗考证[M].日本明和七年(1770)东都书林村田小兵卫、松本善兵卫刊本.
[3] (日)荻生徂徕.绝句解[M].日本延享三年(1746)京都书林谷村丰左卫门、江户书林松本新六、松本善兵卫刊本.
[4] (日)井上通煕.明七子诗解[M].日本宝历七年(1757)皇都书林桐华轩、寿德堂、白玉房合刻本.
[5] (日)东条琴台.先哲丛谈续编[M].日本明治十七年(1884)东京千锺房刊本.
[6] (日)荻生徂徕.唐后诗[M].日本元文五年(1736)武江书林松本新六刊本.
[7] 赵季,叶言材,刘畅.日本汉诗话集成:第12册[Z].北京:中华书局,2019.5280.
[8] 陈广宏,侯荣川.日本所编明人诗文选集综录[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2018.79.
[9] 陈广宏. 明代文学东传与江户汉诗的唐宋之争[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,(6):66-67.
[10] (日)荻生徂徕.徂徕集[M].日本宽政三年(1791)大阪书林森本文金堂刊本.
[11] 潘畅和. 东亚儒家文化圈的价值冲突——以古代朝鲜和日本的儒家文化比较为中心[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012.130.
[12] 徐师曾. 文体明辨序说[M].罗根泽校点.北京:人民文学出版社,1998.
[13] 唐汝询.唐诗解[M].明万历四十三年(1615)陈所蕴序刊本.
[14] 吕祖谦. 吕氏家塾读诗记[M].梁运华点校.杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2017.5.
[15] 李东阳. 怀麓堂诗话校释[M].李庆立校释.北京:人民文学出版社,2009.92.
[16] 胡应麟. 诗薮[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1979.
[17] 杨慎撰. 升庵诗话新笺证[M].王大厚笺证.北京:中华书局,2008.966.
[18] 吴承学. 评点之兴──文学评点的形成和南宋的诗文评点[J].文学评论,1995,(1):30-31.
[19] 李贽.明诗选[M].日本延宝六年(1678)柳川震泽序刊本.
[20] 王世贞. 艺苑卮言校注[M].罗仲鼎校注.济南:齐鲁书社,1992.
[21] 李攀龙. 沧溟先生集[M].包敬第标校.上海:上海古籍出版社,2014.825.
[22] 沈德潜,周准.明诗别裁集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2013.1. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 40 
