|
|
|
| The Paradigm of “Humanistic Reasoning” and Its Characteristics in Educational Studies |
| ZHANG Xiang-yun |
| Ministry of education, Shen Zhen University,Shen zhen, Guangdong, 518060 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In contrast to “the scientific truth” which is oriented to the epistemic division between the subjective and the objective, “the humanistic reasoning” focuses on the ontological integration of the subjective with the objective. Educational studies require pursuit for both “the scientific truth” and “the humanistic reasoning”. As education is humanistic in its very nature, we suggest educational studies should evolve into a paradigm called “the humanistic reasoning”, complimentary to the paradigm of “the scientific truth”. Based on “the humanistic reasoning”, educational theories and practice need to both adhere to their tradition and make a further progress. Adhering to the tradition means “affirmation and representation” while progress reflects an active “piralling accumulation” and an orientation to “ontological drive” in methodology. This paradigm presupposes two basic assumptions:For one thing, the subject is the medium.Teachers are the common carriers and connectors of theories, principles and technologies.For another thing,the teacher is the curriculum.Teachers should attach more importance to self-cultivation.In order to revive“the humanistic reasoning”,we need to keep its merits in mind and achieve the unity of knowledge and practice consciously,following the principle of yin and Yang.In this way, a balanced self-development will be achieved between the educational studies as a whole and the individual researchers, leading to a health and stable educational progress.
|
|
Received: 02 May 2021
|
|
|
| About author:: 广东省教育科学“十三五”规划2019年度高校哲学社会科学专项研究项目“大湾区背景下中国传统文化创造性转化的教育机理研究”（2019GXJK115）; 广东省研究生教育创新计划项目“迈向新工科的研究生人文素养研究与实践”（2019JGXM92） |
|
|
|
[1] 钱穆. 中国思想通俗讲话[M].上海:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2002.
[2] 尤西林. 有别于涵义(meaning)的意义(significance)[J].学术月刊,1996,(10):21-26.
[3] 赵汀阳. 一个或所有问题[J].社会科学战线,1997,(1):70-78.
[4] 蒙培元. 中国哲学的方法论问题[J].哲学动态,2003,(10):3-8.
[5] 韦政通. 我治中国思想史的经验——在华中师范大学中国近代史研究所的讲演[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,(4):100-106.
[6] 大学·中庸[M].王国轩译注.北京.中华书局,2006.9.
[7] 刘力红. 思考中医[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2006.6.
[8] 张祥云.人文教育:回归本体功夫[J].学园,2012,(3):8-12.
[9] 张载. 张载集[M].北京.中华书局,1978.3. |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 38 
