合作治理交往行动网络的行动主义建构

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (5)

Download: PDF (617 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract As a new model of social governance, the primary feature of collaborative governance is that it is composed of multiple actors and their actions, and the interaction network between actors is the central nervous system of this organism. Individuals can make decisions and take actions along the continuum of judgment-choice-action. In contrast, multiple actors including individuals and organizations must depend on the communication network as a bridge to realize the effective coordination between decision-making and action. Given this logic, the open exploration from the perspective of activism reveals that there are (but not limited to) three possible choices for the construction of the communication action network. First,, we should build the system of data flow, information flow and knowledge flow of cooperative communication network based on the fluidity of communication. Second, we should build an open, organic and coordinated communication action system based on the flexibility of action. Third, we should construct a continuum of judgment-decision-action to supporting activism communication based on the fault tolerance of choice.

Key words： communicative action network collaborative governance fluidity activism fault tolerance

Received: 12 October 2020

PACS:

D035

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	TANG Qiu-wei

Cite this article:

TANG Qiu-wei. Construction of Communicative Action Network in Collaborative Governance from the Perspective of Actualism[J]. , 2021, 38(4): 106-115.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2021/V38/I4/106

[1] March, James G., Herbert A.Simon. Organizations[M].New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,1958.118-122.
[2] 张康之等. 任务型组织研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009.1.
[3] (美)彼得·圣吉.第五项修炼——学习型组织的艺术与实践[M].张成林译.北京:中信出版社,2009.5.
[4] Baker,W.E.The Network Organization in Theory and Practice[A].N.Nohria, R. G. Eccles. Networks and Organizations:Structure,Form,and Action[M].Boston:Harvard Business School Press, 1992.397-427.
[5] (美)罗恩·阿什克纳斯等.无边界组织:打破组织结构的锁链[M].姜文波译.北京:机械工业出版社,2005.1.
[6] 张康之. 论组织整合机制中的信任[J].河北学刊,2005,(1):18-23.
[7] 穆胜. 只有“云组织”才能适应云时代[J].中外管理,2015,(4):40-45.
[8] Kilduff, M., Tsai, W.Social Networks and Organizations[M].London: SAGE, 2003.4.
[9] Cross,R.,Parker,A.The Hidden Power of Social Networks:Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations[M].Boston,MA:Harvard Business School Publishing,2004.3.
[10] Alexander,D.,J.M.Lewis,M.Considine.How Politicians and Bureaucrats Network: A Comparison across Governments[J].Public Administration,2011,89(4):1274-1292.
[11] Agranoff,R.Inside Collaborative Networks:Ten Lessons for Public Managers[J].Public Administration Review,2006,66,Special Issue: 56-65.
[12] 唐秋伟. 解析交往行动网络: 多维界面与质疑反思[J].宁夏社会科学,2020,(3):138-146.
[13] (美)哈尔特穆特·罗萨.加速:现代社会中时间结构的改变[M].董璐译.北京:北京大学出版社,2015.127-128.
[14] 周军. 在社会网络结构生成中变革政府模式[J].行政论坛,2016,(2):53-58.
[15] (美)简·E.芳汀.构建虚拟政府:信息技术与制度创新[M].邵国松译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.67.
[16] 周军. 多重失灵与优势整合:跨部门合作网络何以创造公共价值?[J].学海,2020,(3):66-73.
[17] 周军,谭涛.服务型政府建构中基于总体性知识的治理智慧——一种人机融合智能的观察视角[J].浙江学刊,2020,(4):21-30.
[18] 张康之. 模式化行动与合作行动中的知识类型及其比较[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(4): 5-12.
[19] (美)麦克斯·布罗克曼.下一步是什么[M].王文浩译.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2018.189.
[20] (美)乔尔·莫基尔.雅典娜的礼物:知识经济的历史起源[M].段异宾,唐乐译.北京:科学出版社,2010.235.
[21] 张康之. 论分工-协作模式的困境及其出路[J].江苏行政学院学报,2019,(3): 78-86.
[22] (法)古斯塔夫·勒庞.乌合之众:大众心理研究[M].冯克利译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2008.36.