平台从业者职业伤害的权利保护：现实依据、理论基础及制度设计

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (532 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Thanks to the development of network information technology and sharing economy, online platform employment has become an important form of employment. As online platform employees are not subordinate to platform enterprises, they cannot be taken as laborers in the sense of labor law. They are therefore not covered by relevant labor protection and social security policies. As a consequence, a series of social problems arise, especially the disputes resulting from the absence of occupational injury protection. Online platform employees are a disadvantaged group. They engage in jobs of particularly high risk due to the technical rules and the nature of online platform employment. To address this issue, we need to proceed with the theory of legal rights, get an insight into the characteristics of the disadvantaged group of online platform employees, and raise their awareness of rights and empower them to stand up for their legitimate rights in case of work-related injuries. In terms of system design, we can refer to a concept similar to occupational accident insurance, get online platform employees insured based on their economic subordination to their employers. At the same time, we should roll out better policies and regulations regarding tax cuts, scope of protection anddefinition of work-related injuries.

Key words： online platform employees occupational accident insurance disadvantaged people work-related injury insurance labor relations legal rights

Received: 26 March 2021

PACS:

D922.5

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	AI Lin

Cite this article:

AI Lin. Protection of the Rights of Online Platform Employees in Case of Occupational Injuries[J]. , 2021, 38(4): 98-105.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2021/V38/I4/98

[1] 娄宇. 平台经济从业者社会保险法律制度的构建[J].法学研究,2020,(2):190-208.
[2] 田思路. 劳动关系非典型化的演变及法律回应[J].法学,2017,(6):138-147.
[3] 王全兴,刘琦.我国新经济下灵活用工的特点、挑战和法律规制[J].法学评论,2019,(4):79-94.
[4] 北京海淀法院.闪送员起诉确认劳动关系为何被支持?合议庭详解裁判要旨[EB/OL].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/fwtkgTpGnJF2BmyTdlK-Ew?,2021-01-12.
[5] 新京报智库.2020年外卖骑手职业报告超五成外卖骑手对工作满意[EB/OL].http://www.199it.com/archives/115 2887.html,2021-01-12.
[6] 涂永前,何礼苗.数字经济、灵活就业及社会保险法的回应[J].重庆理工大学学报(社会科学),2020, (9):102-111.
[7] (美)弗兰克·Y·奈特.风险、不确定性与利润[M].安佳译.北京:商务印书馆,2009.253.
[8] 王全兴,刘琦.我国新经济下灵活用工的特点、挑战和法律规制[J].法学评论,2019,(4):79-94.
[9] 朱振,刘小平,瞿郑龙.权利理论[M].上海:三联书店,2020.122.
[10] 张文显. 法哲学范畴研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2001.366.
[11] 吴宁. 社会弱势群体保护的权利视角及其理论基础——以平等理论透视[J].法制与社会发展,2004,(3):60-68.
[12] (英)理查德·威尔金森,凯特·皮克特.不平等的痛苦:收入差距如何导致社会问题[M].安鹏译.北京:新华出版社,2010.186.
[13] 胡玉鸿. 正确理解弱者权利保护中的社会公平原则[J].法学,2015,(1):91-102.
[14] 张琳琳. 中国城市化进程中的农民权利诉求[J].法制与社会发展,2011,(1):151-160.
[15] 袁发强. 我国国际私法中弱者保护制度的反思与重构[J].法商研究,2014, (6):98-106.
[16] 夏勇. 中国民权哲学[M]. 北京:三联书店,2004.
[17] (美)卡尔·弗里德里希.超验正义——宪政的宗教之维[M].周勇等译. 北京:三联书店,1997.94.
[18] Jack Donnelly.Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice[M].Ithaca: Cornell University Press,1989.13.
[19] (瑞士)托马斯·弗莱纳.人权是什么?[M].谢鹏程译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000.72.
[20] 吴飞飞. 从权利倾斜到责任倾斜的弱者保护路径转换——基于法经济学视角的解读[J].广东商学院学报,2013,(6):89-96.
[21] 王倩.德国法中劳动关系的认定[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2017, (6):39-48+130.
[22] 徐冬根. 人文关怀与国际私法中弱者利益保护[J].当代法学,2004,(5):12-22.
[23] 应飞虎. 弱者保护的路径、问题与对策[J].河北法学,2011,(7):8-12.
[24] (美)詹姆斯·C·斯科特.国家的视角:那些试图改善人类状况的项目是如何失败的[M].王晓毅译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004.274.
[25] 胡玉鸿. “失败者正义”原则与弱者权益保护[J].中国法学,2014,(5):75-94.