|
|
|
| Cultural Ecological Protection through Integration of Humanistic Culture into Industrial and Urban Development: Theoretical Evolution, Practical Exploration and Mechanism Construction |
| ZHOU Jie |
| College of Liberal Arts, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong, 515063 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The study of cultural ecology has experienced multiple perspectives and theoretical evolution from systems theory to geography and then to anthropology. Its application in the protection of global cultural heritage is mostly reflected in three ways: ecological museums, intangible cultural heritage communities and cultural ecological protection areas. Although it is difficult to implement the conception of ecological museums, to define intangible cultural communities, and to coordinate resources in cultural ecological protection areas, the overall conception of cultural ecological protection is widely recognized. To construct a cultural ecological protection system in the new era, we need to integrate humanistic culture into industrial and urban development. On the one hand, we should clarify the endogenous logic of cultural ecology, and have a new understanding of the spatial relationship pointing to the geographical boundary, the historical relationship pointing to the time axis, the cultural relationship pointing to the heterogeneous civilization and the social relationship pointing to individuals, so as to make the four sub-ecological circles of nature, life, society and industry in a dynamic balance, and promote the multi-dimensional interaction of cultural ecological protection in an integral thinking mode. On the other hand, we should build a coordination mechanism across administrative divisions from a global perspective. We should emphasize system construction and resource integration at macro-level, build four conservation systems at meso-level, and attach importance to the protection of living heritages among common folks at micro-level, so as to make joint efforts to promote the inheritance and revival of traditional cultural resources in contemporary cultural ecological environment.
|
|
Received: 16 November 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] (美) J·H·斯图尔德.文化生态学的概念和方法[J].王庆仁译.世界民族,1983,(6):27-33.
[2] 黄育馥. 20世纪兴起的跨学科研究领域——文化生态学[J].国外社会科学,1999,(6):19-25.
[3] 邓辉.卡尔·苏尔的文化生态学理论与实践[J].地理研究, 2003,(5).
[4] Carl O.Sauer.The Morphology of Landscape[J].University of California Publications in Geography,1925,(2):19-54.
[5] 尹绍亭. 人类学的生态文明观[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2013,(2):44-49.
[6] 钱俊生,赵建军.生态文明:人类文明观的转型[J].中共中央党校学报,2008,(1):44-47.
[7] 乌丙安. 论生态民俗链——中国生态民俗学的构想[J].广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,(3):83-91.
[8] 刘德龙. 构建有中国特色的“生态民俗学”——读江帆的《生态民俗学》[J].民俗研究,2004,(4):182-186.
[9] 江帆. 地方性知识中的生态伦理与生存智慧[J].山东社会科学,2012,(11):82-87.
[10] 龙迪. 国外文化生态保护区规划研究[D].南京:东南大学硕士学位论文, 2016.18.
[11] 苏东海. 国际生态博物馆运动述略及中国的实践[J].中国博物馆, 2001,(2):2-7.
[12] Andre Desvallees and Francois Mairesse. Key Concepts of Museology[M].Paris: Armand Colin and ICOM, 2010.59.
[13] 安来顺. 国际生态博物馆四十年:发展与问题[J].中国博物馆, 2011,(合刊):15-23.
[14] 孟凡行,苏东海,方李莉,安丽哲.生态博物馆建设与民族文化发展——以梭戛生态博物馆为中心的讨论[J].原生态民族文化学刊,2017,(4):128-140.
[15] 曹兵武. 生态博物馆探索与生态文明建设——兼谈文化遗产的活态保护与传承问题[J].中国博物馆,2018,(1):38-42.
[16] 胡朝相. 贵州生态博物馆非物质文化遗产保护的问题[J].中国博物馆,2020,(4):62-63.
[17] 杨利慧. 以社区为中心——联合国教科文组织非遗保护政策中社区的地位及其界定[J].西北民族研究, 2016,(4):63-72.
[18] 孙九霞. 社区参与旅游对民族传统文化保护的正效应[J].广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,(4):35-39.
[19] 邓小艳. 文化传承视野下社区参与非物质文化遗产旅游开发的思路探讨[J].广西民族研究,2012,(1):180-184.
[20] 周建明,所萌,岳凤珍.文化生态保护区的理论基础与规划特征[J].城市规划,2014,(2):49-54.
[21] 陈华文,陈淑君.中国文化生态保护区的实践探索研究[J].浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版),2016,(2):4-18.
[22] Carl O.Sauer.Theme of Plant and Animal Destruction in Economic History[J].Journal of Farm Economics,1938,20:765-775.
[23] 高小康.非遗活态传承的悖论:保护与发展[J].文化遗产,2016,(5).
[24] 苑利.救命的“脐带血”千万要保住——从非遗传承人培训说开去[N].光明日报,2016-01-22(5).
[25] 方李莉. 有关“从遗产到资源”观点的提出[J].艺术探索, 2016,(4):59-67.
[26] 高丙中,宋红娟.文化生态保护区建设与城镇化进程中的非遗保护:机制梳理与政策思考[J].西北民族研究, 2016,(2):198-204. |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 38 
