|
|
|
| Life-Oriented: Paradigm Shift of Anti-Poverty Social Work in the Post-Poverty Era |
| LIU Zhen, XU Li-juan |
| College of Social Development, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, 300384 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Although China has shaken off absolute poverty and entered the post-poverty era, but it does not mean that China's anti-poverty campaign is at an end, and relative poverty is now the focus of China's poverty control. Relative poverty in the post-poverty era is not necessarily reflected in absolute income, but is relative, multidimensional and risky. It not only reflects our pursuit of fairness and justice, but also people's ever growing expectation and demand. This requires the anti-poverty practice in the post-poverty era to be life-oriented. Social work provides multi-dimensional space to settle the problem of imbalanced and inadequate development, and also responds to people's aspiration for a better life, fulfilling multiple functions of interest coordination, multi-faceted synthesis and social security mechanism, so it is necessary and possible for it to intervene in poverty alleviation in the post-poverty era. In the anti-poverty social work in the post-poverty era, we need to broaden our vision and include “life” in social work. Besides, we need to change our idea of social work and pay attention to the life of the poor who need help. Moreover, we need to make changes in methods and reshape the relationship between technological rationality and cultural value. In short, the anti-poverty social work in post-poverty era should be life-oriented.
|
|
Received: 25 September 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 李迎生,徐向文.社会工作助力精准扶贫:功能定位与实践探索[J].学海,2016,(4):114-123.
[2] Fuchs,V.Redefining Poverty and Redistributing Income[J].The Public Interest,1967,14(8):86-94.
[3] 郭熙保. 论贫困概念的内涵[J].山东社会科学,2005,(12): 49-54.
[4] 关信平. 论现阶段我国贫困的复杂性及反贫困行动的长期性[J].社会科学辑刊,2018,(1):15-22.
[5] 邢成举,李小云.相对贫困与新时代贫困治理机制的构建[J].改革,2019,(12):16-25.
[6] 韩克庆,唐钧.贫困概念的界定及评估的思路[J].江苏社会科学,2018,(2):24-30.
[7] 汪三贵,孙俊娜.全面建成小康社会后中国的相对贫困标准、测量与瞄准——基于2018年中国住户调查数据的分析[J].中国农村经济,2021,(3):2-23.
[8] 李小云,许汉泽.2020年后扶贫工作的若干思考[J].国家行政学院学报,2018,(1):62-66.
[9] 沈扬扬,詹鹏,李实.扶贫政策演进下的中国农村多维贫困[J].经济学动态,2018,(7):53-66.
[10] 王小林,冯贺霞.2020年后中国多维相对贫困标准:国际经验与政策取向[J].中国农村经济,2020,(3):2-21.
[11] 贺雪峰. 论后扶贫时代的反贫困战略[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2021,(1):14-21.
[12] 世界银行. 2000-2001年世界发展报告:与贫困作斗争[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2001.15.
[13] (德)埃德蒙德·胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学[M].张庆熊译.上海:上海译文出版社,2005.138.
[14] (奥)阿尔弗雷德·舒茨.社会世界的意义构成[M].游淙祺译.北京:商务印书馆,2012.235.
[15] Garfinkel,H.Studies in Ethnomethodology[M].Cambridge:Polity Press,1984.288.
[16] (德)尤尔根·哈贝马斯.合法化危机[M].刘北成,曹卫东译.上海:上海人民出版社,2000.7.
[17] 沈洁. 社会政策中的“生活”视角——基于日本经验的分析[A].中国社会工作研究(第15辑)[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2017.174-189.
[18] 杨君,徐选国.社会工作、社会承认与生活世界的重构[J].学习与实践,2014,(2):112-119.
[19] 高丽,徐选国,杨威威.新时代社会主要矛盾、社会保护与社会工作的专业回应[J].学习与实践,2019,(4):82-91.
[20] 徐选国. 中国社会工作发展的社会性转向[J].社会工作,2017,(3):9-28.
[21] 徐选国,杨威威,徐永祥.人工智能时代的多重挑战与社会工作的专业回应[J].人文杂志,2018,(6):120-128.
[22] 肖瑛. 风险社会与中国[J].探索与争鸣,2012,(4):46-51.
[23] 韦璞. 贫困、贫困风险与社会保障的关联性[J].广西社会科学,2015,(2):134-141.
[24] 徐选国,阮海燕.试论我国适度普惠社会福利与社会工作的互构性发展[J].天府新论,2013,(1):109-115.
[25] 彭华民. 中国组合式普惠型社会福利制度的构建[J].学术月刊,2011,(10):16-22.
[26] 王思斌. 社会韧性与经济韧性的关系及建构[J].探索与争鸣,2016,(3):4-8.
[27] 彭刚. 丰裕中的贫困[J].教学与研究,2005,(12):30-35.
[28] 费雪莱. 2020年后乡村反贫困治理转型探析[J].青海社会科学,2019,(6):130-136.
[29] 童敏. 从问题视角到问题解决视角——社会工作优势视角再审视[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,(6):1-7.
[30] 王雨磊.数字下乡:农村精准扶贫中的技术治理[J].社会学研究,2016,(6):119-142.
[31] 徐立娟,陈丰.后脱贫攻坚时代社会工作介入相对贫困的情感逻辑——基于S村社会工作项目的经验研究[J].学习与实践,2021,(2):65-75.
[32] 程军.精准扶贫:当代中国国家治理的情感逻辑[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2019,(3):116-124.
[33] 王瑞华. 后精准脱贫时期社会工作参与乡村贫困治理的视角、场景与路径[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,(4):131-138.
[34] 徐选国. 从嵌入系统到嵌入生活:我国社会工作的范式转向与时代选择[J].社会工作与管理,2019,(3):7-15.
[35] 卫小将. “生活政治”治理:精准扶贫工作新转向[J].江海学刊,2020,(4):101-107. |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 38 
