“翻译驱动”与中国的印度学

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (6)

Download: PDF (553 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Ancient Buddhist studies, modern Sanskrit studies and Indology in China all start and evolve with translation, a phenomenon that can be generalized as translation-driven. Before the Song Dynasty, Buddhist studies went hand in hand with Chinese translation of Buddhist scriptures. In the 20th century when translation switched from Buddhist scriptures to Hindu scriptures, this tradition continues. However, for some time, writings and translation have been indistinguishable with the scholar XU Fan-cheng as a representative of this approach. In contemporary China, Indologists like JI Xian-lin, JIN Ke-mu and HUANG Bao-sheng extensively translate Sanskrit classics and Indian classics, but there are clear boundaries between their translations and writings. Indology in China has taken different forms in different periods of history, but one characteristic remains unchanged: It has been and still is translation-driven.

Key words： oriental studies Indology Sanskrit studies translation translation-driven

Received: 14 December 2020

PACS:

I046

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WANG Xiang-yuan

Cite this article:

WANG Xiang-yuan. Translation-Driven Indology in China[J]. , 2021, 38(2): 5-13.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2021/V38/I2/5

[1] 黄宝生. 梵学论集[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2013.1.
[2] 郁龙余. 从佛学、梵学到印度学:中国印度学脉络总述[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2018,(6):5-12.
[3] (唐)慧立,彦琮.大慈恩寺三藏法师传[M].高永旺译注.北京:中华书局,2008.298.
[4] 王向远. “翻”、“译”的思想——中国古代“翻译”概念的建构[J].中国社会科学,2016,(2):138-156.
[5] 徐梵澄. 薄伽梵歌·南印度版译者序[A].徐梵澄文集(第四卷)[M].上海:三联书店,华东师范大学出版社,2006.23.
[6] (印度)室利·阿频罗多.薄伽梵歌[M].徐梵澄译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.前言1.
[7] 徐梵澄. 薄伽梵歌论·前言[A].徐梵澄文集(第四卷)[M].上海:三联书店,华东师范大学出版社,2006.207-208.
[8] 徐梵澄. 《五十奥义书》序及各书引言[A].徐梵澄文集(第四卷)[M].上海:三联书店,华东师范大学出版社,2006.
[9] 石海军. 爱欲正见——印度文化中的艳欲主义[M].重庆:重庆出版社,2008.
[10] 孙波. 徐梵澄精神哲学入蹊[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2013.
[11] 钟三.中国印度学发展要靠真正的学术眼光——访美国堪萨斯大学历史学者陆扬[N].中国社会科学报,2010-11-09(04).
[12] 徐梵澄. 行云使者·译者序[A].徐梵澄文集(第四卷)[M].上海:三联书店,华东师范大学出版社,2006.31.
[13] 徐梵澄. 行云使者·跋[A].徐梵澄文集(第四卷)[M].上海:三联书店,华东师范大学出版社,2006.35.
[14] 郁龙余,刘朝华.中外文学交流史(中国-印度卷)[M].济南:山东教育出版社,2015.283.
[15] 王向远. 译文学——翻译研究新范型[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2018.111-120.
[16] 季羡林. 罗摩衍那初探[M].北京:外国文学出版社,1979.5.
[17] 黄宝生. 学术名家自述·黄宝生[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2017.142.