|
|
|
| The Formation Mechanism of Accountability Confusion and the Way of Precise Governance |
| GU Zhi-jun |
| Institute of Clean Governance/ Research Center for CPC Laws and Regulations, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As an important part of the supervision system of the CPC and the state, the accountability work has achieved great success, but also revealed new problems. These problems can be generalized as “accountability confusion”, which is characterized by formalization, simplification, arbitrariness and selectiveness of accountability. From the perspective of academic theory, the reasons for the accountability confusion lie in the mismatching of accountability rights and responsibilities, the lack of discipline of the accountability subjects, the difficulty in defining the accountability object, the inaccurate accountability boundary, and the inadequate standardization of the accountability process. To prevent and resolve the accountability confusion, we need to adhere to precise thinking and implement precise accountability. Precise governance and technical governance enrich the theoretical basis of precise accountability in terms of purpose and means. Based on the concept of precise governance and technical governance, the realization of precise accountability requires the coordination of technology and system. At the technical level, the approach is based on the use of technology, which drives the accurate realization of accountability by keeping trace of the core elements of accountability. At the system level, the approach is based on the problems reflected at the technical level and enhances the accuracy of accountability by improving the design of the accountability system mechanism. It is of great significance to deeply analyze the formation mechanism of accountability confusion and put forward governance strategies to encourage cadres to take on new responsibilities in the new era.
|
|
Received: 20 October 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 中央纪委国家监委法规室.着力提高问责工作的政治性精准性实效性[J].求是,2019,(24):56-61.
[2] 蒋来用.“问责异化”的形成与矫正机制研究[J].河南社会科学,2019,(7).
[3] 李军鹏. 基层问责滥用的根源、危害与治理[J].人民论坛,2019,(22):52-54.
[4] 张砥.警惕“泛化问责”背后的形式主义[N].北京日报,2018-12-05(3).
[5] Jenkins,R.The Role of Political Institutions in Promoting Accountability[A].in Shah,A. Ed.Performance Accountability and Combating Corruption[C].Washington,D. C.: World Bank,2007.137.
[6] 中共中央关于坚持和完善中国特色社会主义制度推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化若干重大问题的决定[N].人民日报,2019-11-06(1).
[7] 麻宝斌,郭蕊.权责一致与权责背离:在理论与现实之间[J].政治学研究,2010,(1):72-78.
[8] Mulgan R.Holding Power to Account:Accountability in Modern Democracies[M].New York:Palgrave MacMillan,2003.15.
[9] 张贤明. 当代中国问责制度建设及实践的问题与对策[J].政治学研究,2012,(1):11-27.
[10] 谷志军. 党内问责制:历史、构成及其发展[J].社会主义研究,2017,(1):99-104.
[11] 习近平.在省部级主要领导干部学习贯彻党的十八届五中全会精神专题研讨班上的讲话[N].人民日报,2016-05-10(2).
[12] 陶立业. 地方政府工作部门权责清单制度效用的提升路向[J].江淮论坛,2019,(5):107-112.
[13] 贾金峰. 明确问责程序促进问责工作规范化[J].中国纪检监察,2019,(18):44-45.
[14] 郑东风.以精准思维推动高质量发展[N].中国纪检监察报,2019-07-11(5).
[15] 李大宇,章昌平,许鹿.精准治理:中国场景下的政府治理范式转换[J].公共管理学报,2017,(1):1-13.
[16] 颜昌武,杨郑媛.什么是技术治理?[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,(2):11-22.
[17] 刘永谋. 技术治理的逻辑[J].中国人民大学学报,2016,(6):118-127.
[18] 吕德文. 治理技术如何适配国家机器——技术治理的运用场景及其限度[J].探索与争鸣,2019,(6):59-67. |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 38 
