|
|
|
| 2020 Academic Report of Researches on China's Cultural Industry |
| ZHOU Jian-xin, HU Peng-lin |
| Institute of Cultural Industry, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 has tremendous impact on cultural industry. The researches on China's cultural industry generally focused on the plight, breakthrough and high-quality development of cultural industry under the pandemic. In terms of topics, there were many researches on the development of cultural industry, the deep integration of culture and technology, the integrated development of culture and tourism, digital economy and cultural industry, live streaming, e-sports and short videos under the pandemic, which reflects the wide attention of the academia to hot social issues, industrial difficulties, cultural technology and new forms of business. In terms of the basic theory of cultural industry, industrial formats, corporate parks, industrial policies, and regional cultural industries, researches paid more attention to the topics such as conceptual elements, subdivisions, industrial chains, industrial legislation, and regional coordinated development. According to the 2020 annual report of cultural industry, the number of researches was on the decline, but they have been gradually standardized and become an annual must-read for academics, as well as reference for the government in decision-making and guide for corporate development. In terms of academic conferences and journals, conferences were held both online and offline, showing a tendency of going online, focusing on hot issues, and being innovative. Academic journals also preferred high-quality papers on cultural industry, which attracted wide attention through new media from political, industrial, academic and research circles. 2020 was a turning point for China's cultural industry. In the future, it is necessary to continue to guide traditional cultural industry to accelerate its digitization process, promote integrated development of cultural industry and related industries, put more efforts in the research on emerging digital cultural industry formats, increase doctoral programs on cultural industry, and always put social benefits first in the development of cultural industry.
|
|
Received: 12 November 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 张胜冰,关卓伦.突发公共事件下我国数字文化产业的新机遇与新挑战[J].出版广角,2020,(6):10-13.
[2] 范周. 数字经济变革中的文化产业创新与发展[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,(1):50-56.
[3] 杨晓东,崔莉.疫情防控形势下加快激发数字文化产业新动能[J].社会科学家,2020,(1):132-136.
[4] 花建,陈清荷.沉浸式体验:文化与科技融合的新业态[J].上海财经大学学报,2019,(5):18-32.
[5] 杨睿博,刘伟.粤港澳大湾区文化科技融合发展动因与路径分析[J].科技管理研究,2020,(20):29-35.
[6] 徐翠蓉,赵玉宗.文旅融合:建构旅游者国家认同的新路径[J].旅游学刊,2020,(11):11-12.
[7] 黄永林. 数字文化产业发展的多维关系与时代特征[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2020,(17):22-29.
[8] 刘素华. 文化产业本质的再研究:基于“结构化”理论的视角[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2019,(10):73-83.
[9] 向勇.阐释、批判与建构主义:中国文化产业研究范式的立场解释[J].探索与争鸣,2020,(6):127-134+160-161.
[10] 刘静,惠宁.新中国成立70年以来文化产业的演变、特征与经验[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2020,(2):193-199.
[11] 刘瑞明,毛宇,亢延锟.制度松绑、市场活力激发与旅游经济发展——来自中国文化体制改革的证据[J].经济研究,2020,(1):115-131.
[12] 王光文. 基于人工智能应用的文化产业发展系统问题及优化[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,(3):51-59.
[13] 詹绍文,王旭.论创新网络结构、网络关系对中小型文化企业创新能力的影响——组织间学习的中介效应[J].西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,(3):108-117.
[14] 叶林,李艳琼,方峥,余江,郭子桢.文化产业扶贫政策的增收和减贫效应:微观机制和贵州农民画的经验[J].贵州财经大学学报,2020,(2):84-97.
[15] 周婷. 中国文化产业的激励性立法探究[J].法制博览,2020,(31):42-43.
[16] 马艳菲. 粤港澳大湾区文化产业融合发展研究——基于产业制度性开放合作的视角[J].经济管理文摘,2020,(12):11-14.
[17] 周建新,刘宇.我国省域文化资本估算及其空间差异——基于2007-2017年省域面板数据的研究[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,(5):72-83.
[18] 李凤亮.新文科:定义·定位·定向[J].探索与争鸣,2020,(1):5-7.
[19] 魏鹏举. 中国文化产业高质量发展的战略使命与产业内涵[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,(5):48-55. |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 38 
