从“文类研究”到“文化政治”:“中国抒情传统”论述的典范建构及话语更迭

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (4)

Download: PDF (609 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In the discussion about the overseas Chinese's study of “Chinese lyric tradition”,researchers often confuse two key concepts—“lyric tradition”and the study of “lyric tradition”.The former is a judgment and conclusion of Chinese literary history;the latter is a set of knowledge discourse,cognitive framework and poetic thinking mode around this judgment and conclusion.The change from “lyric tradition”to the study of “lyric tradition”has contributed to the rise of the so-called “constructivism”in the study of Chinese lyric tradition in recent years.From the perspective of constructivism,the academic genealogy of study of lyrical tradition established by Shih-hsiang Chen,Yu-kung Kao and then David Der-wei Wang reveals the paradigm shift from genre studies to cultural politics.The two resulting different paradigms of modernity illustrate the trajectory of the discourse of lyric tradition evolving from internal study to external study,and from defending aesthetic autonomy to ideology,providing reference and inspiration for rethinking the twists and turns and different paths for the changes in modern Chinese literary theory.

Key words： lyrical tradition genre studies cultural politics discourse paradigm construction of knowledge genealogy modernity of literature Shih-hsiang Chen Yu-kung Kao David Der-wei Wang

Received: 20 June 2020

PACS:

I06

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	SHEN Yi-fan

Cite this article:

SHEN Yi-fan. From Genre Studies to Cultural Politics:The Paradigm Construction and Discourse Transition of Overseas Chinese's Discussion about “Chinese Lyrical Tradition”[J]. , 2020, 37(6): 23-31.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2020/V37/I6/23

[1] 陈国球.“比兴”与“抒情”——谈“中国抒情传统”论述与“比兴”研究[A].陈国球.情迷家国[C].上海:上海书店出版社,2007.332-337.
[2] 张淑香.抒情传统的本体意识——从理论的“演出”解释《兰亭集序》[J].中外文学,1992,20(8):85-99.
[3] 萧驰.中国抒情传统[M].台北:允晨文化实业股份有限公司,1999.
[4] 黄锦树.抒情传统与现代性:传统的发明,或现代性的转化[J].中外文学,2005,34(2):157-186.
[5] 陈国球,王德威.抒情之现代性——“抒情传统”论述与中国文学研究[C].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2014.671.
[6] 柯庆明,萧驰.中国抒情传统的再发现:一个现代学术思潮的论文选集(上、下)[C].台北:台湾大学出版中心,2009.6.
[7] 吴盛青,高嘉谦.抒情传统与维新时代:一个视域的形构[J].扬子江评论,2011,(5):18-31.
[8] 陈国球.“抒情”的传统[A].陈国球,王德威.抒情之现代性——“抒情传统”论述与中国文学研究[C].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2014.5-32.
[9] 陈国球.抒情中国论[M].香港:三联书店,2013.4.
[10] 陈世骧.中国的抒情传统[A].陈世骧.陈世骧文存[C].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1998.
[11] 高友工.文学研究的美学问题(下)[A].高友工.美典:中国文学研究论集[C].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2008.
[12] 王德威.抒情传统与现代性:在北大的八堂课[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2010.72.
[13] 陈世骧.原兴:兼论中国文学特质[A].陈世骧.陈世骧文存[C].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1998.149-152.
[14] Northrop Frye.The Educated Imagination[M].Bloomington:Indiana University Press,1964.1-160.
[15] 徐承.方东美、徐复观美学思想对观——兼论海外华人中国美学研究的两种模式[J].文艺理论研究,2013,(5):111-121.
[16] 王德威.史诗时代的抒情声音——二十世纪中期的中国知识分子与艺术家[M].台北:麦田出版社,2017.10.
[17] 李杨.“抒情”如何“现代”,“现代”怎样“中国”——“中国抒情现代性”命题谈片[J].天津社会科学,2013,(1):100-110.
[18] 徐威.论反抒情[J].星星·诗歌理论,2017,(14):20-31.
[19] 徐承.中国抒情传统学派研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2015.220.
[20] 刘志伟,孙歌.在历史中寻找中国:关于区域史研究认识论的对话[M].上海:东方出版中心,2016.
[21] (英)雷蒙·威廉斯.关键词:文化与社会的词汇[M].刘建基译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2016.537-539.
[22] (英)E.霍布斯鲍姆,T.兰格.传统的发明[M].顾杭,庞冠群译.南京:译林出版社,2004.
[23] (捷)普实克.抒情与史诗:中国现代文学论集[C].郭建玲译.上海:上海三联书店,2010.1-26.
[24] 张晖.中国“诗史”传统[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2012.177-204.