|
|
|
| Innovation Capital Formation: Primary Objective and Construction of “Two Areas” |
| HU Yao-ting1, CHEN Zuo-hua2 |
1.Research Institute of Shenzhen Stock Exchange,Shenzhen,Guangdong,518038;
2.School of Accounting, Shandong University of Finance and Economics,Jinan,Shandong, 250014 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract At present, international trade frictions keep flaring up and are likely to continue for a long time to come. Destabilizing factors affecting global economic growth are on the increase. China’s economy is facing great challenges in the process of shifting to high-quality development. In recent years, the CPC central committee has launched two national strategies, namely, the construction of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and the pilot demonstration area for socialism with Chinese characteristics (hereinafter referred to as the “two areas”), as major plans for implementing the strategy of innovation-driven development. The primary objective of the construction of the “two areas” is to cultivate the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and Shenzhen as an innovation capital formation center. Currently, this region is pretty well-prepared for this objective in terms of economy, human resources, and innovation capacity, and also has an edge in policy and institution, and advantages of being a financial hub. To build a world-leading innovation capital formation center, it is necessary to construct a transparent, open, dynamic and resilient multi-level capital market, to accelerate the reform of Chinext and launch pilot projects in the registration system of IPO Stocks, promote the development of the venture investment market, to a first-class ecosystem for innovative capital, to steadily open up the market, and to push forward the connectivity and factor integration within the “two areas” region.
|
|
Received: 06 January 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 李建伟. 中国经济增长四十年回顾与展望[J].管理世界,2018,34(10):11-23.
[2] 洪俊杰,商辉.中国开放型经济发展四十年回顾与展望[J].管理世界,2018,34(10):33-42.
[3] 刘彦平,李超,黄浩,等. 四大湾区影响力报告[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2019.
[4] 杨东亮,李春凤.东京大湾区的创新格局与日本创新政策研究[J].现代日本经济,2019,38(6):80-92.
[5] 辜胜阻,吴华君,吴沁沁,等.创新驱动与核心技术突破是高质量发展的基石[J].中国软科学,2018,(10):9-18.
[6] 彭兴庭,卢晓珑,卢一宣,等.全球大湾区资本形成机制比较研究[J].证券市场导报,2019,(3):4-12+22.
[7] 辜胜阻,曹誉波,杨威.科技型企业发展的多层次金融支持体系构建[J].商业时代,2011,(22):77-78+102.
[8] 辜胜阻,庄芹芹.资本市场功能视角下的企业创新发展研究[J].中国软科学,2016,(11):4-13.
[9] 廖士光,缪斯斯,张晓斐,等.纽交所和纳斯达克上市制度变迁及启示[J].证券市场导报,2018,(1):13-20.
[10] 李金甜,郑建明,王怡彬.新三板企业退出做市转让:“情非得已”还是“心甘情愿”?[J].证券市场导报,2019,(1):11-19.
[11] 辜胜阻,曹冬梅,杨嵋.构建粤港澳大湾区创新生态系统的战略思考[J].中国软科学,2018,(4):1-9. |
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 37 
