异质性环境规制、制度协同与城市建设用地生态效率

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (602 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Abstract: Based on the data of key construction areas of national ecological civilization pilot area (Jiangxi) from 2006 to 2017, using the SBM model and panel threshold model in combination, this paper makes an empirical study of the influence mechanism of incentive and non-inventive environmental regulations and their interaction on ecological efficiency of urban construction land. The findings is as follows: Firstly, environmental regulations generally restrain the growth of ecological efficiency of urban construction land, but the effects of environmental regulations significantly differ from one another. Secondly, there is a significant institutional synergy between the influence of incentive and non-incentive environmental regulations on the ecological efficiency of urban construction land. Thirdly, the awareness of environmental regulation compliance plays a significant regulatory role in the development of system synergy. When the awareness of social regulation compliance crosses the critical point, both the incentive and non-incentive environmental regulations can improve the institutional synergy.

Key words： incentive environmental regulation non-incentive environmental regulation urban construction land ecological efficiency institutional coordination regulatory compliance consciousness

Received: 13 April 2019

PACS:	F062.2
	F061.5

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHONG Cheng-lin
	HU Xue-ping

Cite this article:

ZHONG Cheng-lin,HU Xue-ping. Incentive and Non-incentive Environmental Regulation, Institutional Coordination and Ecological Efficiency of Urban Construction Land Use[J]. , 2019, 36(6): 70-81.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2019/V36/I6/70

[1] Schaltegger S, Sturm A.kologischerationalitt:Ansatzp-unkte zur ausgestaltung vonkologieorientierten managementinstrumenten[J].Die Unternehmung,1990,44(4):273-290.
[2] 游和远,吴次芳,林宁,等.基于数据包络分析的土地利用生态效率评价[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(3):309-315.
[3] 谢曼曼,李秀霞.基于数据包络分析法的吉林省土地利用生态效率时空演化规律研究[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(3):225-230.
[4] 朱旭森. 基于DEA的土地利用经济效率和生态效率评价——以西南地区为例[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2016,33(4):194-200.
[5] 李桂媛,郭琦,杨凡星.宜昌市城市边缘区土地生态效率及效益初探[J].三峡大学学报(自然科学版),2016,38(3):48-52+63.
[6] 潘润秋,易子豪,张琴.基于DEA模型和Malmquist生产效率指数的我国省际土地利用生态效率时空演变[J].江苏农业科学,2018,(5):1-6
[7] 金贵,吴锋,李兆华,等.快速城镇化地区土地利用及生态效率测算与分析[J].生态学报,2017,37(23):8048-8057.
[8] 李林,张文方,伍雯.我国城市土地利用结构生态效率DEA模型分析[J].广东土地科学,2015,14(04):13-19.
[9] 杨皓然,吴群.碳排放视角下的江苏省土地利用转型生态效率研究——基于混合方向性距离函数[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(10):1718-1730.
[10] 刘勇. 江苏省土地利用程度与区域生态效率关系研究[J].中国土地科学,2010,24(4):19-24.
[11] 谢花林,张道贝,王伟.鄱阳湖生态经济区城市土地利用效率时空差异及其影响因素分析[J].农林经济管理学报,2016,15(4):464-474.
[12] Porter M,Claas V L.Toward a new conception of the environment:competitiveness relationship[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives,1995,9(5):97-118.
[13] 乔美华. 环境规制对R&D创新效率影响的双重效应——基于省际工业面板数据经验研究[J].现代经济探讨,2018,(9):79-89.
[14] 屈文波. 环境规制、空间溢出与区域生态效率——基于空间杜宾面板模型的实证分析[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018,20(6):27-33.
[15] 谢波,单灿阳,张成浩.科技创新、环境规制对区域生态效率的影响研究[J].生态经济,2018,34(4):86-92.
[16] 张子龙,王开泳,陈兴鹏.中国生态效率演变与环境规制的关系——基于SBM模型和省际面板数据估计[J].经济经纬,2015,32(3):126-131.
[17] 高瑜玲,林翊.环境规制对区域生态效率的影响——基于中国省际面板数据的检验[J].福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,21(3):44-50.
[18] 任胜钢,蒋婷婷,李晓磊,等.中国环境规制类型对区域生态效率影响的差异化机制研究[J].经济管理,2016,38(1):157-165.
[19] 罗能生,王玉泽.财政分权、环境规制与区域生态效率——基于动态空间杜宾模型的实证研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(4):110-118.
[20] 任海军,姚银环.资源依赖视角下环境规制对生态效率的影响分析——基于SBM超效率模型[J].软科学,2016,30(6):35-38.
[21] 张根文,邱硕,张王飞.强化环境规制影响企业研发创新吗—基于新《环境保护法》实施的实证分析[J].广东财经大学学报,2018,(6):80-88.
[22] Tone K.A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J].European journal of operational research,2002,143(1):32-41.
[23] Hansen B E.Threshold effects in non-dynamic panel: estimation, testing and inference[J].Journal of econometrics,1999,93(2):345-368.