|
|
From Study of Confucian Classics to Sinology: The Disciplinary Evolution and Paradigm Shift of the Study of Mencius since Modern Times |
ZHANG Shao-en |
Department of Philosophy, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, 071000 |
|
|
Abstract Since the end of the Qing Dynasty, with the impact of Western learning and the push of disciplinary replacement, the study of Mencius has changed from Westernized study of Confucian classics to dissociation of the study of Confucian classics, and then dispersed into studies of literature, history and philosophy. After being included in academic disciplines, forms and research paradigms of the study of Mencius have also changed with the evolution of disciplines. After the dissociation of study of Confucian classics, the study of Mencius was initially transformed into a sort of historical study, falling into an evidence-based and theoretically fragmented situation. Then, the philosophical approaches brought the study of Mencius into conceptual category and back to the field of metaphysics. However, whatever the research paradigm it adopts, the study of Mencius is hindered by professional barriers and binary separation between traditional and modern approaches, making it difficult to advance the overall study of Mencius. Therefore, it is necessary to make sinology, which integrates literature, history and philosophy, a prominent discipline in the future so as to further promote the modern transformation and future development of the study of Mencius.
|
Received: 10 April 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 景海峰. 清末经学的解体和儒学形态的现代转换[J].孔子研究,2000,(3):85-97. [2] 蔡元培. 蔡元培自述(1868-1940)[M].北京:人民日报出版社,2011.287. [3] 陈少明. 走向后经学时代[A].汉宋学术与现代思想[M].广州:广东人民出版社,1995.128. [4] 黄俊杰. 东亚儒家经典诠释史中的三个理论问题[J].山东大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2018,(2):143-150. [5] 黄俊杰. 中国孟学诠释史论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004. [6] 刘星. 浅论康有为科学思想的现代价值[J].自然辩证法研究,2019,(2):99-105. [7] 张少恩,刘星.论康有为对经学与西学的调融[J].广西社会科学,2017,(9):75-80. [8] 左玉河. 从四部之学到七科之学[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2004.152. [9] 陈少明. 由训诂通义理:以戴震、章太炎等人为线索论清代汉学的哲学方法[J].中国社会科学,2018,(4):41-58,205. [10] 章太炎. 孟子大事考[A].傅杰编.章太炎学术史论集[C].昆明:云南人民出版社,2008.211. [11] 陈壁生. 经学的瓦解从“以经为纲”到“以史为本”[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2014.169. [12] 景海峰. 国学学科所面对的知识状况与体制困境[J].中山大学学报 (社会科学版),2017,(5):141-143. [13] 程志华. 中国近现代儒学史[M].北京:人民出版社,2010.76. [14] 袁保新. 孟子三辩之学的历史省察与现代诠释[M].台北:文津出版社,1992.22. [15] 徐庆文. 从注释性经学到观念性哲学[J].齐鲁学刊,2015,(1):5-9. [16] 李学勤.国学的主流是儒学,儒学的核心是经学[N].中华读书报,2010-08-10. [17] 张少恩. 改革开放40年孟子学研究:学术回归与方法多元[J].社会科学战线,2018,(8):22-33. |
|
|
|