|
|
|
| Regulatory Approaches to Overlapping Responsibilities in the Local Government’s Power and Responsibility List |
| TAO Li-ye1, LIU Gui-zhi2 |
1. College of Marxism, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060;
2. College of Political Science and Law, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, 130117 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As a fundamental institution to build a law-based and service-oriented socialist government with Chinese characteristics, the local government’s power and responsibility list can straighten out the powers and responsibilities among the departments of local governments in an institutionalized manner, and serves as an institution to regulate and prevent the overlapping responsibilities in the government. Objectively speaking, the local government’s power and responsibility list published and implemented in China is inadequately normative regarding the institution design in regulating the overlapping responsibilities among government departments. To make the list of powers and responsibilities better regulate overlapping responsibilities, first of all, local governments at all levels and their departments should distinguish the essential difference between the phenomenon of overlapping responsibilities and the negative consequences caused by improper handling of the phenomenon, and define the inherent relationship between regulating overlapping responsibilities and the effectiveness of the institution of the power and responsibility list. Secondly, we should uphold problem-oriented and goal-oriented institution design, improve the content section of the power and responsibility list on regulating overlapping responsibilities, and optimize the technological route of the power and responsibility list on regulating overlapping responsibilities. Thirdly, in the process of institutional implementation, the dynamic management mechanism, collaborative implementation mechanism should be brought into full play to ensure effective regulation and governance of overlapping responsibilities in the government at practical level.
|
|
Received: 10 March 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 杨志云,殷培红,和夏冰.政府部门职责分工及交叉的公众感知:基于环境管理领域的分析[J].中国行政管理,2015,(6):82-87.
[2] 徐军,王国栋.省级权责清单差异性研究:原因、问题、规范[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2019,(2):93-101.
[3] 王湘军,李雪茹.从“碎片化”到“整体化”:清单管理制度健全路径探论[J].行政论坛,2019,(2):48-57.
[4] 梁远. 让权责清单在落地运用中结出制度硕果[J].中国行政管理,2018,(8):13-17.
[5] 徐刚,杨雪非.区(县)政府权责清单制度象征性执行的悖向逻辑分析:以A市Y区为例[J].公共行政评论,2017,(4):54-79.
[6] 陶立业,刘桂芝.新时代中国特色社会主义新型政府构建的三重逻辑[J].马克思主义研究,2018,(9):20-29.
[7] 阳东辰. 公共性控制:政府环境责任的省察与实现路径[J].现代法学,2011,(2):72-81.
[8] 任建明. 责任与问责:填补权力制度体系的要素空白[J].理论探索,2016,(5):5-10.
[9] 唐亚林,刘伟.权责清单制度:建构现代政府的中国方案[J].学术界,2016,(12):32-44.
[10] 曾哲,曾心良.权责清单软法属性的证成及规制[J].南京社会科学,2019,(1):102-108. |
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 36 
