|
|
|
| Harmonious but Different: Cooperative Governance in Government Purchasing Public Services at the Grassroots Level |
| ZHENG Jia-si |
| Party School of Guangdong Provincial Committee of CPC/Administration Department, Guangdong Institute of Public Administration, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510003 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The relationship between the government and social organizations is the epitome of the relationship between the state and society. The empirical analysis of public service purchasing projects at the grassroots level in China shows that the government and social organizations have the same strategies but different goals, presenting the mode of “co-optation relationship”. Different from the Western society in which the two sides in the co-optation relationship are prone to be totally dependent upon or conflicting with each other, partnership relationship is common in the interaction between the government and social organizations in China. When the goals of the government and social organizations are different, some social organizations try to achieve a “delicate balance” between survival needs and autonomy through reducing resource dependence, improving independence, enhancing professionalism, strengthening core competitiveness, and taking regular flexible strategies. That is to say, social organizations can, to some extent, bargain on the basis of ensuring the realization of their own goals, and essentially make the interactive relationship develop towards partnership or cooperative relationship, rather than conflicting or completely dependent relationship, so as to form a relatively effective cooperative governance pattern between the government and social organizations.
|
|
Received: 15 May 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 李培林. 我国社会组织体制的改革和未来[J].社会,2013, 33(3):1-10.
[2] 张康之. 合作治理是社会治理变革的归宿[J].社会科学研究,2012,(3):35-42.
[3] 康晓光. 权力的转移——1978-1998年中国权力格局的变迁[J].中国社会科学季刊,2000(夏季号) :45-62.
[4] Kettl, Donald F .The Job of Government: Interweaving Public Functions and Private Hands[J]. Public Administration Review, 2015, 75(2):219-229.
[5] 敬乂嘉. 从购买服务到合作治理——政社合作的形态与发展[J].中国行政管理, 2014,(7):54-59.
[6] Najam A.The Four-C's of Third Sector‐Government Relations[J].Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 2000, 10(4):375-396.
[7] 广州市人民政府办公厅关于印发广州市社工服务站(家庭综合服务中心)管理办法的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.gz.gov.cn/gzgov/s2812/201806/6aee5bbdf78249d482 b2949e7554d1cf.shtml,2019-04-05.
[8] 岳经纶,王燊成.社会服务管理中的管理主义与专业主义张力:基于政府购买社会服务的分析[J].行政论坛,2018,(1):34-42.
[9] 王思斌. 社会工作导论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004. 1.
[10] 李迎生, 方舒.中国社会工作模式的转型与发展[J].中国人民大学学报,2010,24(3):101-108.
[11] 广州162个公益创投项目落地[N].新快报,2018-6-21(A06).
[12] 撬动社会力量服务社区[EB/OL].http://news.ifeng.com/a/20151104/46107530_0.shtml,2019-03-21.
[13] 徐宇珊. 非对称性依赖:中国基金会与政府关系研究[J]. 公共管理学报,2008,(1):33-40.
[14] 朱静君. 督导手记——社区公共问题的介入[J].社会工作,2011,(7):21.
[15] 王思斌, 阮曾媛琪. 和谐社会建设背景下中国社会工作的发展[J].中国社会科学,2009,(5):128-140.
[16] Brettell, Anna, Environmental Non-governmental Organizations in the People’s Republic of China: Innocents in a Co-opted Environmental Movement[J].The Journal of Pacific Asia, 2000(6): 27-56.
[17] 王峰. 寻找平衡之美:评《合作治理:再造公共服务的逻辑》[J].公共行政评论, 2010,(5):195-201.
[18] 陈天祥,郑佳斯.双重委托代理下的政社关系:政府购买社会服务的新解释框架[J].公共管理学报,2016,(3):36-48.
[19] 程坤鹏,徐家良.从行政吸纳到策略性合作:新时代政府与社会组织关系的互动逻辑[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2018,34(6):76-84.
[20] 郑佳斯. 策略性回应:社会组织管理中的政府行为及其逻辑[J].学习与实践,2019,(3):84-94.
[21] (法)皮埃尔·卡蓝默.破碎的民主:试论治理的革命[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2005.101.
[22] 徐勇. 治理转型与竞争─合作主义[J].开放时代,2001,(7):25-33. |
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 36 
