“包容”：“一带一路”下全球治理的中国软法方案和推进路径

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (651 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The Belt and Road Initiative has provided a significant platform for China to contribute to the construction of an international discourse that reflects the common values of the world. Therein, the international soft law can provide a gradual yet feasible path for the development of global governance under the Belt and Road Initiative. With the soft law, the new element of “inclusive” in the field of international economic law may develop into an important new principle of future international economic cooperation. It is observed that about 41% (35/85) of the official documents of the Belt and Road Initiative have referred to “inclusive”, with a frequency of up to 68 times. Theoretically, “inclusive” has three core elements: subject diversity, process interaction and results sharing. In the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative, a double-layer macro and micro propulsion path is suggested to make “inclusive” a soft principle “without legal binding yet with practical effect” rather than a mere concept in documents to gradually meet the requirements of “state practice (material factors)”and“opinio juris(psychological factors)”, and eventually to be upgraded to be the principle of international customary law with rigid force and contribute to the development of international rule of law.

Key words： Belt and Road Initiative soft law inclusive pluralism PEP model

Received: 26 March 2019

PACS:	C939
	D922.299

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	BI Ying

Cite this article:

BI Ying. Inclusive: China’s Soft Law Program and Promotion Path for Global Governance under the Belt and Road Initiative[J]. , 2019, 36(3): 37-45.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2019/V36/I3/37

[1] 张文显. 推进全球治理变革,构建世界新秩序——习近平治国理政的全球思维[J].环球法律评论,2017,(4):15.
[2] 罗豪才.加强软法研究推动法治发展[N].人民日报,2014-06-02(07).
[3] C.Schreuer.Source of International Law:Scope and Application[EB/OL].https://www.univie.ac.at/intlaw/wordpress/pdf /59_sources.pdf.2019-02-20.
[4] Francis Snyder.Soft Law and Institutional Practice in the European Community[A].Stephen D.Martin.The Construction of Europe: Essays in Honour of Emile NOEL[C]. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers,1994.197-225.
[5] 尚杰. 国际软法问题研究[D].长春:吉林大学法学院博士论文,2015.10.
[6] 何志鹏,孙璐.国际软法何以可能:一个以环境为视角的展开[J].当代法学,2012,(1):36.
[7] 何志鹏. 逆全球化潮流与国际软法的趋势[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,(4):61.
[8] 亚历山大·基斯.国际环境法[M].张若思译.北京:法律出版社,2000.65.
[9] 何志鹏. 国际法治的中国方案——“一带一路”的全球治理视角[J].太平洋学报,2017,(5):5.
[10] 韩永红. 一带一路国际合作软法保障机制论纲[J].当代法学,2016,(4):156.
[11] 车丕照,孙劼.国际经济法研究的三重境界——车丕照教授访谈[J].上海政法学院学报(法治论丛),2018,(2):10.
[12] 《汉语大辞典》在线词典[EB/OL].http://www.hydcd.com/zidian/hz/1789.htm.2018-11-30.
[13] 《牛津词典》在线词典[EB/OL].https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/inclusiveness.2018-12-20.
[14] 《牛津学习者词典》在线词典[EB/OL].http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/inclusiveness?q=inclusiveness.2019-01-15.
[15] Cambridge Dictionary[EB/OL].https://dictionary.cambri-dge.org/zhs/词典/英语/inclusiveness.2018-09-15.
[16] 叶朗.中华文明的开放性和包容性——以唐太宗开启的大唐盛世和宋元时期泉州的历史为例[N].北京日报,2017-07-21(019).
[17] 周可真,李惠玲.殊相性包容与共相性包容:中西文化包容性之差异[J].社会科学战线,2015,(12):31.
[18] 刘晓东. 包容性增长:中国经济社会改革新思维[J].企业经济,2011,(9):123.
[19] 陈世清.什么是包容性发展[EB/OL].http://finance.takungpao.com/mjzl/mjhz/2016-09/3369769.html.2018-09-04.
[20] 李万强. 国际经济法存在与发展的新视角[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2017,(1):90.
[21] 王翼. “包容性发展”:全球化语境中的时代命题——兼析“包容性发展”的中国要义[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2012,(7):60-69.
[22] 徐倩. 包容性治理:社会治理的新思路[J].江苏社会科学,2015,(4):17.
[23] 许立勇,高宏存.“包容性”新治理:互联网文化内容管理及规制[J].深圳大学学报(人文社科版),2019,(2):51.
[24] 林琼. 包容性治理:生态公共治理变革新向度[J].江西社会科学,2013,(12):190.
[25] 高传胜. 论包容性发展的理论内核[J].南京大学学报(哲学人文科学社会科学版),2012,(1):38.
[26] 王竹立. 包容性思维网络时代学习的一种新思维方法[J].开放教育研究,2014,(6):88.
[27] 刘琳娜. 论包容性思维范式及其社会实践价值[J].科学社会主义,2012,(1):97.
[28] 袁达松. 走向包容性的法治国家建设[J].中国法学,2013,(2):6.
[29] 李万强. ”一带一路”倡议与包容性国际法发展[J].江西社会科学,2017,(5):5.
[30] Mathias Koenig-Archibugi.Introduction: Institutional Diversity in Global Governance[A].Mathias Koenig-Archi-bugi,Michael Zürn.New Modes of Governance in the Global System:Exploring Publicness, Delegation and Inclusiveness. International Political Economy Series[C]. London: Palgrave,2006.1-30.
[31] Alkuin K lliker. Conclusion I: Governance Arrangements and Public Goods Theory: Explaining Aspects of Publicness, Inclusiveness and Delegation[A].Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, Michael Zürn. New Modes of Governance in the Global System: Exploring Publicness, Delegation and Inclusiveness. International Political Economy Series[C]. London: Palgrave, 2006.201-235.
[32] 王竹立.包容性思考[EB/OL].http://www.zhixing123.cn/lilun/inclusiveness-thinking.html.2012-03-29.
[33] 一带一路沿线65个国家和地区名单及概况[EB/OL].http://ydyl.people.com.cn/n1/2017/0420/c411837-29225 243.html.2017-04-20.
[34] 王树文. 一带一路PPP模式中风险分析及风险规避路径选择[J].东岳论从,2016,(5):72.
[35] 金永祥,宋雅琴等.从PPP到PEP:政府和社会资本合作的本质探究[EB/OL].http://www.dayue.com/templates/T_Second/index.aspx?contentid=3559&nodeid=50&page =ContentPage.2018-03-29.
[36] 毕莹. “一带一路”倡议下亚洲区域贸易整合路径探析——以与中日韩自贸区的对接为例[J].浙江学刊,2018,(3):134.
[37] Julien Chaisse,Mitsuo Matsushita.China’s“Belt and Road”Initiative:Mapping the World Trade Normative and Strategic Implications[J].Journal of World Trade, 2018,(1):181.
[38] 浙大报道:为一带一路争端解决贡献中国智慧[EB/OL].http://www.zju.edu.cn/2018/0428/c578a802077/pagem.htm. 2018-04-28.
[39] Guiguo Wang.The Belt and Road Initiative in Quest for a Dispute Resolution Mechanism[J].Journal Asia Pacific Law Review,2017,(1):14.